Evaluating the Methylphenidate Patch to Treat Former Stimulant Users With ADHD

June 12, 2018 updated by: Aimee McRae-Clark, Medical University of South Carolina

The Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Methylphenidate Patch in Former Stimulant Users With ADHD

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Daytrana® in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults who have abused stimulants in the past. Daytrana® is a stimulant medication that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of ADHD in children over the age of 6 years old.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Methylphenidate and amphetamines are considered to be the first line of treatment for ADHD in children (Biederman et al, 1997). Although treating children and adolescents with stimulants does not appear to increase the risk of substance use disorders (Wilens et al, 2003), little is known about the abuse of prescription stimulants in adults with ADHD. A review of the literature on the abuse potential of methylphenidate in animals and humans found that methylphenidate produced reinforcing, discriminative-stimulus, and subjective effects similar to amphetamines or cocaine (Kollins et al, 2001). Although the abuse rates of methylphenidate and other stimulant medications used for the treatment of ADHD have not been empirically established, significant concern exists so that regulatory mandates are enforced to control distribution, and some physicians may be reluctant to use stimulants in patients with drug abuse histories. The introduction of a methylphenidate patch is an important advancement, as the patch formulation should increase compliance while minimizing abuse potential, making it an attractive treatment option in the large population of individuals who have a history of previous drug misuse. The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the methylphenidate patch in adult individuals with ADHD who have abused stimulants in the past. It is hypothesized that the methylphenidate patch will be efficacious in reducing ADHD symptoms in this population.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy men and women, 18 to 65 years of age
  2. Meet DSM-IV criteria for past stimulant (cocaine, methamphetamine, or prescription stimulant) abuse or dependence, with past abuse/dependence defined as a minimum of three months since meeting DSM-IV criteria, or have exhibited a pattern of stimulant misuse. For the purposes of this study, stimulant misuse will be defined as using someone else's stimulant ADHD medication for a minimum of four times in a one-month period, and this misuse must have occurred for at least three months.
  3. Meet DSM-IV criteria for current ADHD, determined by a clinical interview and confirmed by semi-structured interview with the Conners' Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV (CAAR-D; Conners et al, 1999)
  4. ADHD symptom severity indicated by a score of 12 or greater on the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale
  5. All subjects will agree to and sign a written, IRB-approved informed consent
  6. Subjects must live within a 60-mile radius of Charleston, SC, to facilitate study visit compliance

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals meeting DSM-IV dependence for any substance with the exception of nicotine and caffeine
  2. Individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for a lifetime history of schizophrenia or another non-affective psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder, since these patients will most likely be taking other psychotropic medications and often require intensive psychiatric care
  3. Individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for current major depressive disorder or eating disorder, since these individuals will likely require treatment with psychotropic medications.
  4. Individuals who present significant suicidal risk
  5. Individuals with significant cognitive impairment as measured by a score of less than 26 on the Mini-Mental Status Exam, as they may be unable to understand the informed consent, comply with study protocol, or accurately complete assessments
  6. Individuals currently receiving stimulants, benzodiazepines, antidepressant or antipsychotic medications.
  7. Individuals currently receiving psychotherapy focusing on reducing ADHD symptoms, as this could confound the effects of methylphenidate treatment
  8. Pregnant or nursing women, or women who refuse to use adequate birth control, as methylphenidate has not been approved for use in pregnancy
  9. Individuals without stable housing, as contacting these individuals would be difficult
  10. Individuals with major medical illnesses (e.g., HIV, renal failure, unstable angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, infectious hepatitis)
  11. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (defined as having blood pressure greater than 140/90 measured on 3 or more occasions), as methylphenidate treatment can be associated with increases in blood pressure
  12. Individuals with a significant family history of cardiac abnormalities, as these individuals may be more susceptible to cardiac adverse events
  13. Individuals who are obese (greater than 30% over ideal weight or BMI greater than 30) as this may interfere with absorption of methylphenidate
  14. Individuals who, in the investigators' opinion, would not be able to comply with study procedures, such as individuals unable to reliably present for intake appointments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Daytrana (methylphenidate patch)
Methylphenidate patch
Drug: Daytrana (methylphenidate patch)
Subjects will be provided with a 7-day supply of medication at each study visit. The dose will be flexible and will be titrated based on effect and tolerability. Unless a subject is experiencing side effects, the dose will be increased if a 25% reduction in ADHD symptoms as determined by the WRAADDS is not obtained. A proposed dosing schedule is as follows: Week 1: 12.5 cm2, Week 2: 18.75 cm2, Week 3: 25 cm2, Week 4: 37.5 cm2. The dose may be decreased as needed for tolerability.
Other Names:
  • Daytrana Patch, Methylphenidate Patch

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ADHD Symptom Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
Primary efficacy endpoint will be ADHD symptom severity, as measured by mean change from baseline in the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale total score (WRAADS).The WRAADS measures symptoms in 7 categories: attention difficulties, hyperactivity/restlessness, temper, affective lability, emotional overreactivity, disorganization, and impulsivity. The scale rates individual items from 0 to 2 (0 = not present, 1 = mild, 2 = clearly present) so there may be a minimum total score of 0 (no symptoms present) through a maximum score of 56 (symptoms clearly present).
Baseline, Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Positive Drug Screen
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Secondary efficacy endpoints will be substance use during the study, as measured by total number of participants testing positive for substances other than a stimulant on weekly urine drug screens
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Shire

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aimee L. McRae-Clark, Pharm.D., Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 23, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 27, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HR#16784

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings