Cholera Toxin B Subunit (CTB) Administered by Mucosal Way in Healthy Adult Volunteer

March 26, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Functional Exploration of the Immune Response Using the B-subunit of Cholera Toxin Administered by Mucosal Way in Healthy Adult Volunteer: Potential Role in Development of Vaccine Processes

It is a biomedical research without direct individual benefit, exploring and comparing the mucosal immune response after oral, nasal and sublingual administration of B-subunit of non-toxic cholera toxin (CTB) in healthy adult volunteers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The immense majority of the infections involve the mucosal surfaces as a gateway of the pathogenic agent. These mucosal surfaces are mainly represented by the gastrointestinal, respiratory and urogenital tract. These mucosal surfaces contain a highly developed immune system, which can exploit in a mucus vaccine approach to fight against infectious agents upon their penetration in the body. It has been established that to be effective against infection mucosa, a vaccine must stimulate the local immune system. This objective is reached much more efficiently when the vaccine is administered by mucosal way (oral, nasal) than by the parenteral classical way. Recent works allowed developing a new non invasive system of administration of vaccines. It is based on the mucosal administration (oral, nasal, rectal, vaginal) comprising a combination of antigen bound (either chemically or by genetic fusion) to the non-toxic subunit of cholera toxin or CTB (Cholera Toxin B subunit). This subunit has an exceptional affinity for GM1 ganglioside expressed on the surface of all nucleated cells. So, the mucosal administration (by oral or nasal route) of a low dose of an antigen linked to the CTB - Mucosal vector with immunomodulatory properties - Leads powerful secretor immune responses in the exposed mucous As well as in distant mucous, with a strong production of secretories IgA.

The developed methods of exploration have to allow to characterize the cells which live (or which migrate) in the mucous membrane investigated on the functional and phenotypic plan.

This research should lead to a range of standardized operating procedures, allowing to evaluate the immunogenicity of vaccines candidates to the mucous administration and of predictive markers of the type of immune response generated.

The main objective of the study is to analyse at the healthy voluntary subjects the systematic immunizing answer induced after nasal, oral or sublingual administration of the CTB from blood samples - the lymphoid "compartment" the most accessible at the man- from saliva and from nasal wash. The immune response after administration of the CTB By sublingual way should be comparable in that of two other ways in term of intensity of the response, however, with a different IgA / IgG report.

The secondary objective of the study is to establish a range of tests to predict the character and the intensity of this response by analyzing the expression of B cells certain surface molecules marking their future for the production of Antibodies.

It is a regional prospective monocentric study conducted in opened without direct individual profit. The study will be conducted over 3 years including 24 months of recruitment for each patient with a follow-up of 35 days and 6 months of operation data.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Laboratoire d'anatomo-pathologie, hôpital Pasteur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult male between 18 and 50 years,
  • Adult female aged 18 to 50 years under oral contraception (pill) for at least 6 months, or IUD for at least 6 under, and agreeing to carry out a pregnancy test during the initial clinical visit
  • Affiliate or entitled to Social Security
  • Signing the informed consent of the volunteer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Seropositive patient for HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C (oral questioning)
  • Pregnant Woman, parturient or breast-feeding
  • News hospitalized for other reasons that the research
  • Minor, Major under supervision
  • Participation in a current or recent study or at present in period of exclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
voie nasale 0.25 mg
Biological: CTB by nasal way
Experimental: 2
0.5mg of CTB by oral way
Biological: absorption of CTB by oral way
absorption of CTB by oral way
Experimental: 3
1mg of dukoral by oral way
Biological: absorption of dukoral by oral way
absorption of dukoral by oral way
Experimental: 4
0.25mg of CTB by sublingual way
Biological: absorption of CTB by sublingual way
absorption of CTB by sublingual way
Experimental: 5
1mg of CTB by sublingual way
Biological: absorption of CTB by sublingual way
absorption of CTB by sublingual way

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary criteria which will estimate this immune response is the production of immunoglobulin A1, A2 and G totals specific to the CTB contained at the level of salivary secretions or produced by mononuclear cells of peripheral blood.
Time Frame: every week during 5 weeks
every week during 5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The secondary criteria of judgment are other phenotypic and functional changes induced on the immune cells present in saliva or in the blood after administration of CTB.
Time Frame: every week during 5 weeks
every week during 5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul HOFMAN, Professor, Departement d'anatomo-pathologie, CHU de Nice

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 2, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 12, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PHRC 2003 CTB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Clinical Trials on CTB by nasal way

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings