Comparison Between 2l vs 3l in HFNC During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants (TRAMONTANE2)

May 28, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Comparison Between 2l/Min/kg vs 3l/Min/kg in High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants

The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of 2 different flow with High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants.

Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center.

Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS >3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups:HFNC "2l/min/kg" or HFNC "3l/min/kg" during 24 hours.

Conditions of measurements:

Primary endpoint: Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours.

Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

Secondary outcomes: Assessment at H1, H12, H24 of mWCAS, respiratory and heart rate, EDIN score, skin lesions, FiO2 required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%, transcutaneous PCO2 (correlated to an initial gas analysis), Report SpO2 / FiO2

Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis.

Expected number of patients: 135 per arm: 270 children.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34285
        • University Hospital of Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age < 6 months
  • bronchiolitis
  • mWCAS > or =3
  • hospitalisation: PICU
  • signed consent form by parents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intubated patient
  • Neurological or cardiac disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: treatment by 2l/min/kg in HFNC
treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC) during the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants (0-6 months years old)
Experimental: treatment by 3l/min/kg in HFNC
treatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC) during the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants (0-6 months years old)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of failure in both arms
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.
up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of heart rate in both arm
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
up to 24 hours
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDIN
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
up to 24 hours
assessment of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in both arms
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
FiO2 required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%
up to 24 hours
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms (mWCAS)
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
up to 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

July 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data will be centralized at the sponsor office for the final analysis

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchiolitis

Clinical Trials on treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)

Subscribe