Drug and Non-Drug Treatment Of Severe Migraine (TSM)
Drug and Non-Drug Treatment of Severe Migraine
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Athens, Ohio, United States, 45701
- Ohio University
-
Westerville, Ohio, United States, 43081
- OrthoNeuro, Inc.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 to 65 years
- Diagnosis of migraine with or without aura (International Classification of Headache Disorders)
- 3 or more migraine episodes/month with disability for the past 6 months
- Less than 20 total headache days/month for the past 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medication overuse headaches
- Currently taking medications contraindicated by study protocol and unable or unwilling to withdraw
- Concurrently undergoing counseling/psychotherapy treatment
- Unable to read, understand or record information in study diaries, questionnaires, and migraine management manual.
- Unable/unwilling to give written informed consent
- History of exclusionary medical condition such as, but not limited to, epilepsy, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, hepatic or renal impairment, stroke, ischemic abdominal syndromes, peripheral vascular disease.
- Uncontrolled hypertension at screening (sitting systolic pressure > 160 mmHg, diastolic pressure > 95 mmHg)
- Fertile female who is breastfeeding, pregnant planning a pregnancy within the next year or is unwilling to use adequate contraception.
- Has exclusionary medical condition such as but not limited to diabetes (insulin dependent), tuberculosis, bronchospastic disease (asthma), heart disease (or multiple risk factors for heart disease), angina pectoris, documented silent ischemia, or cardiac arrythmias requiring medication, or a clinically significant EKG abnormality.
- Other pain diagnosis is primary presenting problem (e.g., fibromyalgia)
- Has a substance abuse problem or a psychological disorder that prevents participation in study (e.g., unmanaged severe depression that requires immediate treatment or limits participation in home-based treatment)
- Hypersensitivity, intolerance or contraindication to use of Propranolol, Nadolol, Sumatriptan, or Rizatriptan
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: 1
Optimal Acute Therapy plus Beta Blocker Placebo
|
Placebo
This acute therapy protocol emphasized treatment with a 5-HT1B/D-agonist or triptan.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID; ibuprofen) and anti-emetic (metoclopramide) medication could be added as needed.
The choice of triptans (rizatriptan®, sumatriptan®), the route(s) of triptan administration (oral, nasal spray, subcutaneous injection), and the addition of a NSAID, or anti-emetic were tailored to participant preference, treatment history and acute therapy response.
Individualized handouts and a phone call (week 3) of the OAT Run-in were used to help participants evaluate and optimize their acute therapy.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Optimal Acute Therapy plus Beta Blocker (propranolol or nadolol)
|
This acute therapy protocol emphasized treatment with a 5-HT1B/D-agonist or triptan.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID; ibuprofen) and anti-emetic (metoclopramide) medication could be added as needed.
The choice of triptans (rizatriptan®, sumatriptan®), the route(s) of triptan administration (oral, nasal spray, subcutaneous injection), and the addition of a NSAID, or anti-emetic were tailored to participant preference, treatment history and acute therapy response.
Individualized handouts and a phone call (week 3) of the OAT Run-in were used to help participants evaluate and optimize their acute therapy.
Other Names:
Treatment initiated with 1 capsule (60 mg long acting propranolol hydrochloride) and increased to 3 capsules (180 mg) at week 12 as tolerated.
If subject does not tolerate at least 2 capsules (120 mg) of propranolol hydrochloride-LA, and in treating neurologist's judgment are unimproved, subject switched to second medication (nadolol).
Participants initially receive a single 40 mg capsule of nadolol and increased to 2 capsules (80 mg) as tolerated.
At week 12 dose stabilized at highest tolerated level.
In evaluation phase, an increase to 4 capsules of long acting propranolol hydrochloride (240 mg) or 3 capsules of nadolol (120 mg) permitted.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 3
Optimal Acute Therapy plus Behavioral Migraine Management plus Beta Blocker placebo
|
Placebo
This acute therapy protocol emphasized treatment with a 5-HT1B/D-agonist or triptan.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID; ibuprofen) and anti-emetic (metoclopramide) medication could be added as needed.
The choice of triptans (rizatriptan®, sumatriptan®), the route(s) of triptan administration (oral, nasal spray, subcutaneous injection), and the addition of a NSAID, or anti-emetic were tailored to participant preference, treatment history and acute therapy response.
Individualized handouts and a phone call (week 3) of the OAT Run-in were used to help participants evaluate and optimize their acute therapy.
Other Names:
Session 1: Overview of the pathophysiology of migraine; introduce muscle stretching, deep breathing, PMR, imagery; Session 2: Development trigger management strategy; Use early warning signs as a cue to use behavioral migraine management and acute medication; Session 3:(a) continue with "basic" migraine management skills if these skills have not been mastered;(b) introduce cognitive-behavioral stress-management, if stress is a salient migraine trigger;(c) introduce thermal biofeedback ("hand warming") training with a portable home thermal biofeedback device, if stress is not a notable migraine trigger.
Session 4: Review problems using various behavioral migraine management skills; Prepare written migraine management plan; Relapse prevention addressed
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 4
Optimal Acute Therapy plus Behavioral Migraine Management plus Beta Blocker (propranolol or nadolol)
|
This acute therapy protocol emphasized treatment with a 5-HT1B/D-agonist or triptan.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID; ibuprofen) and anti-emetic (metoclopramide) medication could be added as needed.
The choice of triptans (rizatriptan®, sumatriptan®), the route(s) of triptan administration (oral, nasal spray, subcutaneous injection), and the addition of a NSAID, or anti-emetic were tailored to participant preference, treatment history and acute therapy response.
Individualized handouts and a phone call (week 3) of the OAT Run-in were used to help participants evaluate and optimize their acute therapy.
Other Names:
Treatment initiated with 1 capsule (60 mg long acting propranolol hydrochloride) and increased to 3 capsules (180 mg) at week 12 as tolerated.
If subject does not tolerate at least 2 capsules (120 mg) of propranolol hydrochloride-LA, and in treating neurologist's judgment are unimproved, subject switched to second medication (nadolol).
Participants initially receive a single 40 mg capsule of nadolol and increased to 2 capsules (80 mg) as tolerated.
At week 12 dose stabilized at highest tolerated level.
In evaluation phase, an increase to 4 capsules of long acting propranolol hydrochloride (240 mg) or 3 capsules of nadolol (120 mg) permitted.
Other Names:
Session 1: Overview of the pathophysiology of migraine; introduce muscle stretching, deep breathing, PMR, imagery; Session 2: Development trigger management strategy; Use early warning signs as a cue to use behavioral migraine management and acute medication; Session 3:(a) continue with "basic" migraine management skills if these skills have not been mastered;(b) introduce cognitive-behavioral stress-management, if stress is a salient migraine trigger;(c) introduce thermal biofeedback ("hand warming") training with a portable home thermal biofeedback device, if stress is not a notable migraine trigger.
Session 4: Review problems using various behavioral migraine management skills; Prepare written migraine management plan; Relapse prevention addressed
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Number of Migraine Episodes Per 30 Days at Month 10.
Time Frame: Change from Month 1 to Month 10
|
Change in number of migraine episodes(with 24 hours pain free period required between episodes)per 30 days from OAT run-in (Month 1) to Month 10.Obtained from daily electronic diary.
|
Change from Month 1 to Month 10
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Number of Migraine Days Per 30 Days at Month 10
Time Frame: Change from Month 1 to Month 10
|
Change in the number of days with migraine per 30 days at Month 10 relative to the OAT Run-in (Month 1).
Obtained from daily electronic diary.
|
Change from Month 1 to Month 10
|
|
Change in Quality of Life at Month 10
Time Frame: Change from Month 1 to Month 10
|
Change in Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQL; Martin, et al., 2000: v 2.1) scores at Month 10 relative to OAT run-in (Month 1).
The MSQL is a 14-item self-report measure that assesses the impact of migraine.
The total score ranges from 14 to 84 with higher scores reflecting greater impairment.
|
Change from Month 1 to Month 10
|
|
Change in Number of Migraine Episodes Per 30 Days at Month 16.
Time Frame: Change from Month 1 to Month 16
|
Change in number of migraine episodes (with 24 hours pain free period required between episodes) per 30 days from OAT run-in (Month 1) to Month 16.
Assessed by participant daily electronic diary.
|
Change from Month 1 to Month 16
|
|
Change in the Number of Migraine Days Per 30 Days at Month 16
Time Frame: Change form Month 1 to Month 16
|
Change in the number of migraine days per 30 days at Month 16 relative to the OAT run-in (Month 1).
Assessed by participant electronic diary.
|
Change form Month 1 to Month 16
|
|
Change in Quality of Life at Month 16
Time Frame: Change from Month 1 to Month 16
|
Change in Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQL; Martin, et al., 2000: v 2.1) scores relative to OAT run-in.
The MSQL is a 14-item self-report measure that assesses the impact of migraine.
The total score ranges from 14 to 84 with higher scores reflecting greater impairment.
|
Change from Month 1 to Month 16
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kenneth A Holroyd, Ph.D., Ohio University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Martin BC, Pathak DS, Sharfman MI, Adelman JU, Taylor F, Kwong WJ, Jhingran P. Validity and reliability of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache. 2000 Mar;40(3):204-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00030.x.
- Holroyd KA, Cottrell CK, O'Donnell FJ, Cordingley GE, Drew JB, Carlson BW, Himawan L. Effect of preventive (beta blocker) treatment, behavioural migraine management, or their combination on outcomes of optimised acute treatment in frequent migraine: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010 Sep 29;341:c4871. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4871.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Headache Disorders, Primary
- Headache Disorders
- Migraine Disorders
- Headache
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
- Adrenergic Antagonists
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Antihypertensive Agents
- Vasodilator Agents
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sympatholytics
- Propranolol
- Nadolol
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2R01NS032374 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- NS32374
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.