Neoadjuvant Treatment of Docetaxel, Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide (TAC) Versus Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) in Triple-Negative or Her2 Positive Breast Cancer (NATT)

November 19, 2016 updated by: Kunwei Shen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

A Multi-Center, Randomized Study of Docetaxel, Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide (TAC) Versus Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Triple-Negative or Her2 Positive Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study is to compare the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in triple-negative or Her2 positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (TAC) or docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women in China. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of locally advanced breast cancer has become a standard therapy. Results from neoadjuvant trials have shown that pathological complete response (pCR) is an independent predictor of outcome. Docetaxel was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1990s and has demonstrated good activity in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Both TC and TAC are effective regimens in the adjuvant setting. The most optimal regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment is however unknown. This is especially true in triple-negative or HER2 positive breast cancer. This study will evaluate the pCR rate of TAC and TC as neoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative or HER2 positive breast cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China, 528000
        • The First People's Hospital of Foshan
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510010
        • Guangdong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510010
        • Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Area
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Xiangya Hospital Central South University
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410009
        • Hunan Cancer Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China, 214440
        • Jiangyin People's Hospital
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210009
        • Jiangsu Cancer Hospital
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215004
        • The Second Affilliated Hospital of Suzhou University
      • Wujiang, Jiangsu, China, 215200
        • Wujiang First People's Hospital
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330009
        • The Third Hospital of Nanchang
    • Shandong
      • Linyi, Shandong, China, 276003
        • Linyi People's Hospital
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Ruijin Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200021
        • Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200033
        • The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200092
        • Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 030013
        • Shanxi Provincical Cancer Hospital
      • Xi'an, Shanxi, China, 710061
        • Fisrt Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital Sichuan University
    • Xinjiang
      • Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, 830000
        • Sinkiang Uygur Autonomous Region Cancer Hospital
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China, 650106
        • Yunnan Provincical Tumor Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310006
        • Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310006
        • Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital
      • Ningbo, Zhejiang, China, 315010
        • Ningbo First People's Hospital
      • Taizhou, Zhejiang, China, 318050
        • Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
        • The First Affilliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325208
        • Ruian People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged ≥ 18 years and < 70 years
  • Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70
  • At least one measurable disease according to the RECIST. histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer (excluding inflammatory breast cancer), T2N1 or locally advanced breast cancer (T3-4N0-3 or T0-4N2-3)
  • Biopsy specimens are available for ER, PgR and Her2 detection, patients should be with triple negative or Her2 positive breast cancer, Her2 positivity is defined as FISH/CISH Her2 positive or IHC Her2 3+, Triple-negative disease defined as negativity for ER, PgR and Her2
  • Adequate bone marrow function: Neutrophil ≥ 1.5*109/L; Hb ≥ 100g/L; PLT ≥ 100*109/L
  • An estimated life expectancy of at least 12 months
  • Willing to take biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
  • Women with potential child-bearing must have a negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days of drug administration and agree to use an acceptable method of birth control to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the study
  • Written informed consent according to the GCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior systemic or loco-regional treatment of breast cancer, including chemotherapy
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • With a history of malignant tumor except uterine cervix cancer in situ or skin basal cell carcinoma
  • Patients with medical conditions that indicate intolerant to neoadjuvant therapy and related treatment, including uncontrolled pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitis, severe infection, active peptic ulcer, coagulation disorder, connective tissue disease or myelo-suppressive disease
  • inadequate liver function (bilirubin > 1.0 times upper normal limit [UNL] and ALT and/or AST> 1.5 UNL associated with alkaline phosphatase > 2.5 UNL; inadequate renal function (creatinine > 1.0 times UNL and in case of limit value, Creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min)
  • Contraindication for using dexamethasone
  • History of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled or symptomatic angina pectoris, arrhythmia or myocardial infarction; poorly controlled hypertension (systolic BP > 180 mmHg or diastolic BP > 100 mmHg)
  • Has peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 1
  • Patient is pregnant or breast feeding
  • Known severe hypersensitivity to any drugs in this study
  • Treatment with any investigational drugs within 30 days before the beginning of study treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: TAC Arm
six cycles of neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide
Drug: Docetaxel, Anthracycline (Doxorubicin or Epirubicin), Cyclophosphamide
Docetaxel 75mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2 or epirubicin 60mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 every 3 weeks for six cycles
EXPERIMENTAL: TC Arm
six cycles of neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide
Drug: Docetaxel, cyclophosphamide
Docetaxel 75mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 every 3 weeks for six cycles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pathological complete remission (pCR) rate
Time Frame: after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy
after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 5-year
5-year
clinical response rate
Time Frame: after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy
after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy
safety profile
Time Frame: during neoadjuvant therapy
during neoadjuvant therapy
breast conservation therapy (BCT) rate
Time Frame: after surgery
after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kunwei Shen, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 3, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NATT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings