Improvement of Sensibility in the Foot in Diabetic Patients Induced by EMLA-application to the Lower Leg

December 13, 2013 updated by: Goran Lundborg, Lund University Hospital

Improvement of Sensibility in the Sole of the Foot in Diabetic Patients, Induced by EMLA-application to the Lower Leg - a Double Blind Study

Sensory input from the foot as well as all other body parts results in activation of sensory cortex.

It is well known that the cortical body map is experienced-dependant and can rapidly change in response to changes in activity and sensory input from the periphery [10-12]. Increased activity and sensory input from the hand results in expansion of the cortical hand representation [13-15], while decreased sensory input, for instance by anaesthesia, amputation or nerve injury, results in shrinkage of the cortical hand representation [16-21]. Due to the constant ongoing "cortical competition" between body parts the adjacent cortical areas expand and take over the silent area, deprived of sensory input.

The investigators have recently described striking examples of such rapid cortical re-organisations induced by selective cutaneous anaesthesia of the forearm: application of EMLA cream to the volar aspect of the forearm results in improved sensory functions of the hand [18] linked to expansion of the hand representational area in sensory cortex . In analogy, EMLA application to the lower leg in healthy controls results in improved sensory functions in the sole of the foot linked to expansion of the foot representational area in sensory cortex.

To test the hypothesis that EMLA application to the lower leg of diabetic patients will result in improved sensory functions in the sole of the foot as well as expansion of the foot representation in sensory cortex. The investigators hypothesize that repeated applications of EMLA will result in a long lasting sensibility improvement.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Malmö, Sweden, SE-205 02
        • Department of hand surgery, Malmo university hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (18-75 years) suffering from diabetes with subjective sensory impairment in the sole of the foot.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with painful neuropathy or established ulcer formation in toes or sole of the foot, known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics, major vascular reconstructions, communication problems due to severe language problems.
  • Patients with pacemakers or magnetic implants or suffering from claustrophobia will not be subjected to fMRI-investigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: EMLA cream
Drug: EMLA cream
The study subjects are treated either by 50 g of a local anesthetic agent containing 2.5% Lidocaine and 2.5% Prilocaine (EMLA®, AstraZeneca - Södertälje, Sweden) or a placebo cream, applied to the lower leg. The cream is applied under occlusive bandage (plastic foam and a tube) for 1.5 hours circumferential to the lower leg 10-12 cm distally of the tibial tuberosity and the malleolus at ankle level. Administration of the treatment cream as well as removal after 1,5 hour and at sensory assessment after 1.5 hour and 24 hours, and interviewing the patient about subjective experience from the treatment are performed by an independent research nurse, not involved in the sensory assessment.
Drug: EMLA cream
50g applied according to description of intervention
Placebo Comparator: Placebo cream
A placebo cream identical in appearance and consistency to the experimental cream
Drug: EMLA cream
The study subjects are treated either by 50 g of a local anesthetic agent containing 2.5% Lidocaine and 2.5% Prilocaine (EMLA®, AstraZeneca - Södertälje, Sweden) or a placebo cream, applied to the lower leg. The cream is applied under occlusive bandage (plastic foam and a tube) for 1.5 hours circumferential to the lower leg 10-12 cm distally of the tibial tuberosity and the malleolus at ankle level. Administration of the treatment cream as well as removal after 1,5 hour and at sensory assessment after 1.5 hour and 24 hours, and interviewing the patient about subjective experience from the treatment are performed by an independent research nurse, not involved in the sensory assessment.
Drug: EMLA cream
50g applied according to description of intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Touch thresholds in the sole of the foot (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments)
Time Frame: Screening, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
Screening, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
MRI
Time Frame: MRI-examination, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
MRI-examination, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
fMRI
Time Frame: fMRI-examination, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application
fMRI-examination, before application, 90 min after application, 24 hours after application

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lund University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Göran Lundborg, Professor, Dpt of Hand Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 12, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 14, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 13, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008-001834-29

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on EMLA cream

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings