Emla-Cream as Pain Relief During Pneumococcal Vaccination

October 8, 2025 updated by: Beatrice Olsson Duse

The aim of this intervention study is to compare the efficacy of Emla cream as a pain relief or no pain relief in connection to the first pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months in Child health care.

Primary objective

1.Leads Emla cream as pain relief to children in connection with pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months to lower pain scores in the use of five items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC scale) as a pain measurement instrument?

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this intervention study is to compare the efficacy of Emla cream as a pain relief or no pain relief in connection to the first pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months in Child health care.

Primary objective

  1. Leads Emla cream as pain relief to children in connection with pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months to lower pain scores in the use of FLACC scale as a pain measurement instrument?

    Secondary objectives

  2. Leads Emla cream as pain relief in connection with pneumococcal vaccination to any difference in the child's heart rate response and saturation?
  3. Leads Emla cream as pain relief that it takes longer before the baby starts crying and does the child cry for a shorter time in connection with vaccination?

Method: The study is randomised and singleblind. The study involves 72 children who are 3 months old. 36 children will receive Emla-cream and 36 children will receive placebo-cream.

This study will lead to new knowledge about Emla cream and pneumococcal vaccination. The study will give new knowledge how painful pneumococcal vaccination is for the children. If the study shows that Emla cream don´t give enough pain relief during pneumococcal vaccination more studies should be done with other pain relief.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mariefred, Sweden, 64723
        • Healthcare center Mariefred/Strängnäs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 months to 4 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children, born vaginally or by cesarean section after 37 weeks of gestation, who were not admitted to the neonatal unit. Children should only have been with the newborn screening performed routinely at the hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baby delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps. Children born before gestational week 37. Children in neonatal care and subjected to other testing than newborn screening. Shoulder dystocia. Children susceptible to methaemoglobinaemia in glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia. Children with atopic dermatitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Emla-cream
Dose: 1 g Emla-cream, 1 hour.
Topical anaesthetic
Other Names:
  • Studied drug: Emla-Cream, lidocaine and prilocaine
Placebo Comparator: Miniderm cream
Dose: 1 g Miniderm-cream, 1 hour.
Topical
Other Names:
  • Placebo: Miniderm cream containing 20 % glycerol, non-pharmacological agent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).
Time Frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.

The effect of Emla cream on pain perception during pneumococcal vaccination was measured by FLACC scale that includes five items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability. FLACC scale i a qualitative behavioural scale used for pain assesment and has been validated for use in infants aged 2 months to 7 years. Each item (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability) can give 0,1 or 2 points according to the description included in the FLACC scale. The total summarised pain score can range between 0-10 points. A higher pain-score indicate more pain, which means a worse outcome.

FLACC scale was measured before and after vaccination and compared between the groups (Emla-cream vs Miniderm cream).

Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.
Time Frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.

Latency time to cry (scored in seconds):

  • how long does it takes until the baby starts to cry after vaccination was performed (the longer it takes until the baby starts to cry indicate less pain, a better outcome). Min- or maximum values is not applicable.

Total crying time (scored in seconds):

  • how long time is the baby crying after vaccination was performed (the longer time the baby is crying indicate more pain, a worse outcome). Min- or maximum values is not applicable.
Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.
Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After Vaccination
Time Frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes
Heart rate before and after vaccination (beats per minute), higher values indicate more pain, a worse outcome. Min and max values are not applicable.
Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes
Saturation Before and After Vaccination.
Time Frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes
Oxygen saturation before and after vaccination (0-100%), a lower value indicate more pain, a worse outcome
Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Bartocci, MD, PhD, Astrid Lindren Children´s Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

March 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Emla-cream

Subscribe