Motivational Therapy for Substance Users With Depression (Aftercare)

October 25, 2023 updated by: Suzette Glasner-Edwards, University of California, Los Angeles

The primary objective of the study is to test the incremental efficacy and outcomes of an aftercare program of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy combined with motivational therapy (CBT-MT) relative to treatment as usual (TAU) in improving depression, substance use, and healthcare outcomes in a population with drug dependence and comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD). The investigators expect that among drug-dependent patients with comorbid MDD, CBT-MT will yield better clinical outcomes relative to TAU in reducing depressive symptoms and substance use and improving healthcare outcomes during treatment.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. Test efficacy and outcomes of CBT-MT and TAU
  2. Evaluate the differential effect of CBT-MT versus TAU on HIV-risk behavior of participants,
  3. To evaluate the impact of cognitive functioning on treatment retention and outcomes, and
  4. To explore additional psychosocial, demographic, and diagnostic factors (e.g., age, gender, education level, motivation for change, social support) that may be associated with treatment outcome and retention in this high need population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will include approximately 80 participants randomized to either 12 weeks of motivational therapy or treatment as usual. Both treatments will meet once weekly for 60 minutes. Participants will be recruited from the Adult Partial Hospitalization program at University of California, Los Angeles. During the active treatment phase, participants will attend clinic weekly for collection of data and urine specimens.

  1. For those randomly assigned to CBT-MT, they will meet with a therapist in a group format for 60-minute sessions once weekly.

    a. Each CBT-MT session will begin with 20 minutes of motivational therapy (MT), followed by 40 minutes of CBT content.

  2. Those randomly assigned to TAU, they will attend a weekly 60-minute Dual Recovery Anonymous self-help group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90025
        • UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 or over
  2. DSM-IV diagnosis of Substance Dependence (cannabis, stimulant, opioid, or prescription drug) or DSM-IV diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence and abuse of cannabis, stimulant, opioid, or prescription drug
  3. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual -IV diagnosis of lifetime Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
  4. BDI-II score of 13 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of life threatening or unstable medical illness
  2. Lack of proficiency in English
  3. Current homelessness (unless residing in a recovery home for which contact information can be provided)
  4. Psychiatric symptoms warranting safety concerns or inpatient treatment, including acute suicide risk
  5. Present diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, or Schizoaffective Disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Motivational Therapy Aftercare
Twelve, 60 minute weekly structured manualized therapy sessions.
Behavioral: Motivational therapy
Twelve, 60 minute weekly structured manualized therapy sessions.
Active Comparator: Dual Recovery Anonymous/Tx as usual
Aftercare Treatment as Usual,which is twelve 60 minute weekly sessions of peer led 12-step Dual Recovery Anonymous group.
Behavioral: Dual Recovery Anonymous/Tx as usual
Twelve 60 minute weekly sessions of peer led 12-step Dual Recovery Anonymous group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Substance Use
Time Frame: weekly during active phase and through study completion, up to 6 months
  • Participants will provide a sample for a urine drug screen (UDS).
  • Participants will also self report substance use.
weekly during active phase and through study completion, up to 6 months
Change in Depression symptoms
Time Frame: weekly during intervention and through study completion, up to 6 months
-Participants will complete the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) to measure changes in depression symptoms over time.
weekly during intervention and through study completion, up to 6 months
Change in Healthcare utilization
Time Frame: weekly and at follow up, up to 6 months
-Participants will self report use of ancillary treatment and healthcare services including ER visits and hospitalizations.
weekly and at follow up, up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy and outcomes of CBT-MT and TAU
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, and at follow up, up to 6 months
- Participants will complete the Addiction Severity Index to assess change in psychosocial functioning between baseline, end of treatment and follow up.
Baseline, end of treatment, and at follow up, up to 6 months
HIV-risk behavior of participants
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment and follow up, up to 6 months
-Participants will complete the Risk Behavior Assessment (RBA) to measure effect of CBT-MT versus TAU on changes in HIV risk behaviors.
Baseline, end of treatment and follow up, up to 6 months
Cognitive functioning
Time Frame: Baseline and end of treatment at 3 months post treatment
-Participants will complete the MicroCog and Wisconsin Card Sort Test impact of cognitive functioning on treatment retention and outcomes.
Baseline and end of treatment at 3 months post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Los Angeles

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Suzette Glasner, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1K23DA020085 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings