Effect of Prevnar 13 on Ear Infections in Children

January 10, 2017 updated by: Pfizer

"a Phase 4, Postmarketing Study Evaluating The Impact Of Prevnar 13 (Trademark)(13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; 13vpnc) In Reducing Acute Otitis Media And Nasopharyngeal Colonization Caused By Streptococcus Pneumoniae In Healthy Children

Prevnar (7 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [7vPnC]) has been shown to be effective against ear infections in children. Prevnar 13 is a new vaccine that is similar to Prevnar. It is expected that the effectiveness of Prevnar 13 against ear infections in children will be similar to that observed following Prevnar. Pfizer has committed to conduct a postmarketing study of the impact of Prevnar 13 in reducing ear infections among children.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Infants who have completed the Prevnar 13 infant vaccination series who provide consent and fit the study inclusion criteria to participate in the study will be recruited.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
239

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Penfield, New York, United States, 14526
        • Penfield Pediatrics
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14606
        • Long Pond Pediatrics
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Legacy Pediatrics
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Lewis Pediatrics
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Pathway Pediatrics
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Sunrise Pediatrics
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Westfall Pediatrics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy children aged approximately 6 to 36 months of age.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has received full (3-dose) infant series of Prevnar 13

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior vaccination with any 7vPnC.
  • Prior vaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23vPS).
  • Any major illness/condition that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk associated with the subject's participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
1
Procedure: Tympanocentesis
To be performed as needed on children presenting with acute otitis media
Procedure: Nose/throat swab
To be performed at every study visit
Biological: Observational
Observational Study Only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Samples With Positive Results for Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotypes 1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A in Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 36
MEF samples were obtained from participants who presented with an episode of AOM as defined by clinical criteria. Total percentage of MEF samples that were tested positive for any of the 6 additional serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A) have been reported.
Baseline up to Month 36

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal (NP/OP) Samples With Positive Results for Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotypes 1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A in Healthy Participants
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 36
Total percentage of NP/OP samples that were tested positive for any of the 6 additional serotypes included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A) have been reported. NP/OP samples were collected from participants at all healthy visits as well as AOM visits.
Baseline up to Month 36
Percentage of Middle Ear Fluid (MEF) Samples With Positive Results for Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotypes Other Than 1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A in Participants With Acute Otitis Media (AOM)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 36
MEF samples were obtained from participants who presented with an episode of AOM as defined by clinical criteria. Total percentage of MEF samples that were tested positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes other than those included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A) have been reported.
Baseline up to Month 36
Percentage of Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal (NP/OP) Samples With Positive Results for Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotypes Other Than 1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A in Healthy Participants
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 36
Total percentage of MEF samples that were tested positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes other than those included in Prevnar 13 (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, or 19A) have been reported. NP/OP samples were collected from participants at all healthy visits as well as AOM visits.
Baseline up to Month 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 6096A1-4010
  • B1851018 (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings