Probiotic-enriched Artichoke in Functional Constipation (PAFC)

December 23, 2011 updated by: Francesco Russo, Azienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia Saverio de Bellis

A Randomized Double-blind, Crossover Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Lactobacillus Paracasei Enriched Artichokes in the Treatment of Functional Constipation

The aim of the present randomized double-blind controlled crossover study is to compare the effects of the 15-day consumption of artichokes enriched with the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei LMGP22043 with those of ordinary artichokes on treatment preference, satisfactory relief of symptoms, bowel habit and the modulation of SCFA production in a group of patients suffering from functional constipation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Functional constipation is a common problem in westernized societies and is characterized by different gastrointestinal symptoms.Different therapeutic strategies have been proposed, but a new therapeutic approach for constipation could be based on the modulation of intestinal microflora by administering prebiotics and/or probiotics. Currently, probiotic products are mainly incorporated in fermented milk-based products or concentrated probiotic preparations. To enlarge the range of choice and to exploit the nutritional qualities of plant matrices, an innovative line of probiotic vegetable products such as artichokes has been developed. The use of these vegetables containing live probiotic strains can take advantage of some their peculiar features for growth and improved bacterial survival. Artichokes can, therefore, work as valid "active" vehicles for the transport and release of adequate amounts of bacterial populations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Bari
      • Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy, 70013
        • National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS "S. de Bellis"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • fulfilment of the Rome Criteria III for constipation
  • availability of at least one GI imaging study during the last five years(colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, abdominal ultrasound, barium enema)
  • commitment to availability for the whole study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major abdominal surgery
  • the presence of any concomitant diseases such as organic GI diseases including lactose and gluten intolerance; medical or psychiatric illness
  • alarming symptoms (rectal bleeding, weight loss, etc)
  • family history of peptic ulcer, colorectal cancer, or IBD;
  • abnormal laboratory data or thyroid function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Probiotic-enriched Artichokes
Artichokes containing approximately 1.20 x 10^8 CFU of live probiotic cells of Lactobacillus paracasei IMPC 2.1 LMGP22043 per gramme
Dietary supplement: Lactobacillus paracasei IMPC 2.1 LMGP22043
participants will complement their usual lifestyles and dietary intakes with probiotic artichokes, enriched with the probiotic strain Lactobacillus paracasei IMPC2.1 (LMGP22043). The product contains approximately 1.20 x 10^8 CFU of live probiotic cells of Lactobacillus paracasei IMPC 2.1 LMGP22043 per gramme, which resulted in a daily dose of about 2 x 10^10 CFU.
Active Comparator: Ordinary artichokes
Ordinary artichokes (probiotic free) of identical shape, texture, and appearance of probiotic-enriched artichokes
Dietary supplement: Ordinary artichokes
Probiotic artichokes will be tested against ordinary artichokes (probiotic free) of identical shape, texture, and appearance produced by the same manufacturer. Artichokes will be put in similar packages and there will be no way to distinguish between the two products.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment preference
Time Frame: After treatment with artichokes enriched with probiotics (period 1: 15 days) and at the end of treatment with ordinary artichokes (period 2: 15 days)
The participants will be asked about treatment preference (the period with least symptoms) at the last visit.
After treatment with artichokes enriched with probiotics (period 1: 15 days) and at the end of treatment with ordinary artichokes (period 2: 15 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue score (VAS) of satisfactory relief of symptoms
Time Frame: At the end of the run-in period (7 days), after treatment with artichokes enriched with probiotics (period 1: 15 days) and at the end of treatment with ordinary artichokes (period 2: 15 days)
The participants will be asked about satisfactory relief of symptoms by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) with grades from 0 (no relief) to 100 (best imaginable relief of symptoms). VAS values will be categorized in 4 classes: 0-25: no or poor relief of symptoms, 26-50: moderate relief of symptoms; 51-75: good relief of symptoms; 76-100: very good relief of symptoms.
At the end of the run-in period (7 days), after treatment with artichokes enriched with probiotics (period 1: 15 days) and at the end of treatment with ordinary artichokes (period 2: 15 days)
GSRS sum score
Time Frame: At the end of the run-in period (7 days), after treatment with artichokes enriched with probiotics (period 1: 15 days) and at the end of treatment with ordinary artichokes (period 2: 15 days)
The GSRS (Gastrointestinal Symptom Scoring Rate) is a validated questionnaire for GI symptoms. GSRS utilizes a seven-level Likert scale (1 to 7), depending on intensity and frequency of GI symptoms.
At the end of the run-in period (7 days), after treatment with artichokes enriched with probiotics (period 1: 15 days) and at the end of treatment with ordinary artichokes (period 2: 15 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia Saverio de Bellis

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Pisa, Italy

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Giuseppe Riezzo, MD, National Institute of Digestive Diseases IRCCS "S. de Bellis"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 26, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0818G

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings