Effects of Hemoperfusion With a Polymyxin B Membrane in Peritonitis With Septic Shock (ABDO-MIX)

December 17, 2013 updated by: Meditor SAS
The purpose of this randomized, comparative, open and multi-centre study is to show that two sessions of hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin performed within maximum 36 hours after the surgery of a peritonitis by hollow organ perforation reduce the mortality in patients suffering from septic shock.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The mortality rate due to peritonitis associated to a severe sepsis or a septic shock remains high (between 40 and 60% as per the studies). The recent complementary therapies for severe sepsis have been reassessed (strict glycaemic control, substitutive corticotherapy, activated protein C). Early neutralisation of the endotoxaemia related to gram-negative bacilli sepsis in contact with hemoperfusion membrane covered with polymyxin B (Toraymyxin™) may enable reduction of the inflammatory reaction caused by sepsis and improve its prognosis. 30 studies, including 10 randomized studies, have compared hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin™ to the standard treatment, showing an improvement in the patients' haemodynamic state, oxygenation conditions and reduction in mortality. This treatment is commonly used in Japan. However, the studies conducted either include only a limited number of patients or are not randomized prospective studies. The post-hoc analysis of a recent randomized study conducted on a limited number of patients with abdominal septic shock shows a significant reduction in mortality after factor adjustment. Though the side effects of such a treatment are limited, its cost is high. Hence, extensive prospective studies are necessary to confirm its effectiveness.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
243

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63058
        • Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
      • Dieppe, France, 76202
        • Dieppe Hospital
      • La Roche sur Yon, France, 85925
        • Vendée Hospital
      • Lens, France, 62307
        • Dr Schaffner Hospital
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Lille University Hospital
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Limoges University hospital
      • Orleans, France, 45067
        • La Source Hospital
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Lariboisiere University Hospital
      • Paris, France, 75475
        • Saint Louis Hospital
      • Perpignan, France, 66046
        • Saint Jean Hospital
      • Pessac, France, 33600
        • Bordeaux University Hospital
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • Poitiers University Hospital
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Pontchaillou University Hospital
      • Roanne, France, 42300
        • Roanne Hospital
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Rouen University Hospital
      • Saint-Malo, France, 35403
        • Saint-Malo Hospital
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091
        • Strasbourg University Hospital
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • Tours University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed community or nosocomial acquired peritonitis due to organ perforation
  • Septic shock requiring catecholamine infusion started or maintained 2 hours after surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • No severity criteria within the 8 hours following surgery
  • Neutropenia due to chemotherapy or malignancy
  • Abdominal sepsis without peritonitis
  • Mesenteric ischemia without perforation
  • Peritonitis due to appendicitis
  • Perforation linked to trauma
  • Cirrhosis child C
  • Impossibility to use heparin
  • Prolonged cardiac arrest within 72h before surgery
  • Terminal disease diagnosed during surgery
  • Moribund subjects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Standard therapy
Standard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate
Device: standard therapy
Standard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate
Experimental: Hemoperfusion
standard therapy + 2 sessions of hemoperfusion within the first 24 hours
Device: standard therapy
Standard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate
Device: hemoperfusion
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin PMX-20R and conventional medical therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate.
Other Names:
  • toraymyxin
  • PMX-20R

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
organ failure assessed by SOFA score
Time Frame: day 3
day 3
delay to withdraw catecholamine after initial shock
Time Frame: day 1-day 28
day 1-day 28
mortality between the two groups at 7 dayx, 14 days, 21 days and 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
number of participants with adverse events related to hemoperfusion technique including anticoagulation therapy such as bleeding (type and number of blood transfusion)
Time Frame: day1-day4
day1-day4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Meditor SAS

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Didier Payen, MD, Lariboisiere University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: René Robert, MD, Poitiers University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2010-67-PMX

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings