The Effect of a Meal on Vitamin D Absorption

May 9, 2013 updated by: Bess Dawson-Hughes, Tufts University

Meal Effects on the 25OHD3 Response to Supplemental Vitamin D3

This study seeks to determine if vitamin D3 absorption in healthy adults will be enhanced in the presence of a meal and if the enhancement will be greater when the meal is low as opposed to high in fat content. The enhancement will result from increased vitamin D absorption. The investigators will test this hypothesis by pursuing the following aims in a 3-mo trial in which up to 70 healthy men and women will be randomized to one of the following meal conditions under which they will take a monthly oral dose of 50,000 IU of vitamin D3: no meal (fasting), a low fat meal, or a high fat meal. The Primary Aim is to identify the meal condition (fasting, low-fat, or high-fat meal) under which the 25OHD3 response to supplemental vitamin D3 is greatest and most consistent. The Secondary Aim is to determine whether vitamin D3 absorption is affected by the meal condition and to determine whether the absorption of vitamin D3 predicts the longer-term 25OHD3 response to supplementation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vitamin D supplements are increasingly recommended to curb widespread deficiency. Decreasing the variability in 25OHD responses to supplemental vitamin D would make the supplementation process more predictable, and thereby reduce the number of 25OHD measurements and dose adjustments that are needed to achieve the targeted 25OHD level. This study seeks to identify potential sources of variability in the 25OHD3 response to supplemental vitamin D3 that are plausible based on rat studies, but have not been explored in humans. The investigators hypothesize that the serum 25OHD3 response to supplemental vitamin D3 in healthy adults will be enhanced in the presence of a meal and the enhancement will be greater when the meal is low as opposed to high in fat content. The enhancement will result from increased vitamin D absorption. The investigators will test this hypothesis by pursuing the following aims in a 3-mo trial in which up to 70 healthy men and women will be randomized to one of the following meal conditions under which they will take a monthly oral dose of 50,000 IU of vitamin D3: no meal (fasting), a low fat meal, or an iso-caloric high fat meal. Serum 25OHD3 will be measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 mo. A serum vitamin D3 absorption test will be performed in each subject after the first dose of vitamin D. The Primary Aim is to identify the meal condition (fasting, low-fat, or high-fat meal) under which the 25OHD3 response to supplemental vitamin D3 is greatest and most consistent. The Secondary Aim is to determine whether vitamin D3 absorption is affected by the meal condition and to determine whether the absorption of vitamin D3 predicts the longer-term 25OHD3 response to supplementation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 50 to 69
  • BMI ≥ 18.5 and ≤ 27.9 kg/m2
  • those taking ≤ 400 IU/day of vitamin D3 and ≤ 1000 mg calcium/day
  • those who participate must agree not to change their dietary or supplemental vitamin D or calcium intake during the study
  • no use of tanning salons
  • no travel south of latitude 34 degrees north during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

General:

  1. A screening 25OHD level ≤8 or ≥ 25 ng/ml
  2. An abnormal serum calcium (reference range is 8.3 -10.2 mg/dl)
  3. A screening spot urinary calcium:creatinine ratio > 0.325
  4. Greater than 2 drinks of alcohol a day.
  5. BMI <18.5 and >27.9 kg/m2
  6. Menses within the last year (women)
  7. Age <50 and > 69 years
  8. Allergy to egg
  9. A blood donation in the last 2 months (increases likelihood of anemia)
  10. Non-English speaking subjects will not be enrolled.
  11. Other abnormalities in screening labs, at the discretion of the study physician (PI)

Medications:

  1. Subjects must agree not to take more than 400 IU per day of vitamin D as supplement or cod liver oil during the study
  2. Topical vitamin D preparations
  3. Oral estrogen or estrogen patch use in the last 6 months
  4. Regular antacid use (>2 times per week)
  5. Sucralfate
  6. Acarbose/miglitol
  7. PPIs - prescription: lansoprazole (Prevacid), omeprazole (Prilosec and Zegerid), esomeprazole (Nexium), rabeprazole (Aciphex), pantoprazole (Protonix); over-the-counter: lansoprazole (Prevacid 24), omeprazole (Prilosec OTC), zegerid OTC (Equate), omeprazole magnesium
  8. H2 blockers - prescription: cimetidine (Tagamet), famotidine (Pepsid), nizatidine (Axid), rantidine hydrochloride (Zantac), dexlansoprazole (Kapidex); over the counter: cimetidine (Tagamet-HB, Equate), famotidine (Pepcid-AC, Pepcid Complete), rantidine hydrochloride (Zantac, Wal-Zan, Equate)
  9. Drugs that alter fat and cholesterol handling - xenical and alli (Orlistat), cholestyramine (Questran, LoCholest, Prevalite), Zetia
  10. Drugs that alter 25OHD metabolism - Antiseizure drugs phenobarbitol and phenytoin (Dilantin), oral glucocorticoids
  11. Calcium supplement use >1000 mg/day

Diseases:

  1. Active parathyroid disease
  2. Sarcoidosis
  3. Peptic ulcers or esophageal stricture
  4. Active malignancy (other than basal cell cancer of the skin) or cancer therapy in the last year
  5. Advanced kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min calculated from serum creatinine with use of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation
  6. Kidney stones in the last 5 years.
  7. Liver disease
  8. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
  9. Known achlorhydria or small bowel overgrowth
  10. Malabsorption
  11. Diseases associated with fat malabsorption - liver disease, cystic fibrosis, Celiac disease, bariatric surgery, Scleroderma, Crohn's, prior surgery involving the stomach or small bowel (appendectomy okay), gall stones or prior gall bladder surgery, pancreatitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Low fat meal
Those subjects who receive a low fat meal prior to vitamin D3 administration
Dietary supplement: cholecalciferol
50,000 IU once per month for 3 months
Other Names:
  • vitamin D3
Active Comparator: High fat meal
Those subjects who receive a high fat meal prior to vitamin D3 administration
Dietary supplement: cholecalciferol
50,000 IU once per month for 3 months
Other Names:
  • vitamin D3
Active Comparator: No meal
Those subjects who do not receive a meal and continue to fast. They only receive the vitamin D3 dose.
Dietary supplement: cholecalciferol
50,000 IU once per month for 3 months
Other Names:
  • vitamin D3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
25OHD3 response to supplemental vitamin D3
Time Frame: 3 months
To identify the meal condition (fasting, low-fat, or high-fat meal) under which the 25OHD3 response to supplemental vitamin D3 is greatest and most consistent, specifically, to describe and compare changes in serum 25OHD3 concentration across the 3 groups.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in parent vitamin D3 levels
Time Frame: 12 hours
To determine whether vitamin D3 absorption is affected by the meal condition, specifically,a) to describe and compare the change in parent vitamin D3 levels over the 12-hr period following the first dose of vitamin D3 across the 3 groups and b) to determine whether the absorption of vitamin D3 at 12 hours predicts the longer-term 25OHD3 response to supplementation.
12 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tufts University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bess Dawson-Hughes, M.D., Tufts Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 28, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2660

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings