Ranibizumab Versus Low-fluence Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

April 5, 2013 updated by: Jang Won Heo

Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Versus Low-fluence Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus low-fluence PDT in the treatment of chronic CSC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by serous detachment of the neurosensory retina. The pathophysiology of CSC is not certain and various theories are proposed including impaired function of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), choroidal ischemia and choroidal hyperpermeability leading to RPE damage. Acute CSC with monofocal or paucifocal changes of RPE usually shows spontaneous resolution and has a favorable visual outcome. Chronic CSC is characterized by multifocal or diffuse decompensation of RPE associated with persistent detachment of neurosensory retina. This might lead to cystoid macular degeneration, foveal atrophy and damage to the foveal photoreceptor layer, consequently resulting in irreversible significant visual loss. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was proposed for the treatment of chronic CSC. Modified parameters of PDT such as shortening of the time of laser emission and reduction of a total light energy have been suggested to reduce the irreversible damages induced by conventional PDT. Recently, intravitreal injection of antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) was proposed as a new treatment option based on the effect of anti-permeability. Several reports demonstrated acceptable outcomes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection, one of anti-VEGF agent. But the clinical results with ranibizumab are not reported yet. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus low-fluence PDT in the treatment of chronic CSC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
34

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
        • • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 0.0 and 1.0 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR)
  2. presence of subfoveal fluid persisting for 3 months or more on optical coherence tomography (OCT)
  3. presence of leakage and multifocal/diffuse RPE decompensation on fluorescein angiography (FA)
  4. choroidal vascular hyperpermeability and abnormal dilation of choroidal vasculature on indocyanine angiography (ICGA)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. previous treatment, such as laser photocoagulation, PDT, intravitreal injection of steroid or anti-VEGF agent
  2. evidence of choroidal neovascularization
  3. any other ocular diseases that could affect visual acuity
  4. systemic steroid treatment in the previous 12 months
  5. media opacity such as cataract that could interfere with adequate acquisition of OCT, FA and ICGA images

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Low-fluence PDT with Verteporfin
Half the regular laser fluence PDT(Visudyne®; Novartis); a total light energy of 25J/cm2, a light dose rate of 300mW/cm2. If subretinal fluid was sustained after primary treatment, rescue treatment(ranibizumab injection) was considered
Drug: Verteporfin
a 6mg/m2 infusion of verteporfin(Visudyne; Novartis)over 10 minutes followed by laser delivery
Other Names:
  • Visudyne
Active Comparator: Ranibizumab
Consecutive Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(Lucentis®, Novartis) 0.5mg/0.05ml for the first 3 months. If subretinal fluid was sustained after primary treatment, rescue treatment(low-fluence photodynamic therapy) was considered
Drug: ranibizumab
Consecutive intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(Lucentis®, Novartis) 0.5mg/0.05ml for the first 3 months
Other Names:
  • Lucentis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants That Achieved Complete Resolution of Subretinal Fluid on OCT Without Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
number of participants who achieved complete resolution of subretinal fluid on OCT without rescue treatment until the end of the study
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in logMAR BCVA
Time Frame: 12 months
the changes from baseline in logMAR BCVA throughout the follow-up period
12 months
Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness on OCT
Time Frame: 12 months
the change from baseline in central foveal thickness measured by OCT throughout the follow-up period
12 months
Number of Participants With Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography
Time Frame: 12 months
number of participants who showed fluorescein leakage after primary or rescue treatment throughout the follow-up period
12 months
Change From Baseline in Choroidal Hyperpermeability on Indocyanine Green Angiography
Time Frame: 12 months
change from baseline in the status of choroidal perfusion and hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography throughout the follow-up period
12 months
Number of Participants Who Underwent Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
number of participants who underwent rescue treatment: ranibizumab injections for the low-fluence PDT group and low-fluence PDT for the ranibizumab group
12 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Event
Time Frame: 12 months
number of participants with adverse event throughout the follow-up period including procedure and drug-related adverse events
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jang Won Heo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Novartis Korea Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jang Won Heo, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NOV001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings