Bascom Cleft Lift Versus Limberg Flap for Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
Comparison of Bascom Cleft Lift Technique Versus Limberg Flap Closure for Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating for Patient Satisfaction and Early Recurrence
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ali GUNER, M.D.
- Email: draliguner@yahoo.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Aydin BOZ, M.D.
- Email: draydin@msn.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Trabzon, Turkey, 61040
- Recruiting
- Trabzon Numune Training and Research Hospital
-
Contact:
- Ali Guner, M:D:
- Phone Number: 1822 90-4622302301
- Email: draliguner@yahoo.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ali GUNER, M.D.
-
Principal Investigator:
- Aydin BOZ, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Can KECE, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Erhan REIS, MD,Professor
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Omer F. Ozkan, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Izzettin KAHRAMAN, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Omer Ileli, M.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All types of pilonidal sinus or cyst
- The patient understands trial information and is capable of making a decision for informed consent after having received information.
- The patient wants to undergo surgery for pilonidal sinus and accepts participation in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- acute abscess formation (Cruse-Foord Class IV)
- patient with minor inflammation are included to trial after two-week antibiotic treatment (Cruse-Foord Class III)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Bascom Cleft Lift Technique
|
Patients are positioned prone.
The skin incision is drawn on the natal cleft, marking out the area of skin to be excised.
The skin from this side of the natal cleft is then elevated.
The skin on the opposite side of the cleft then is undermined to a distance required to allow primary closure of the defect away from the midline without tension.
The elevated skin island is excised.
The sinuses remaining in the deeper tissues are curetted thoroughly.
Hemostasis is maintained.
A 12F low-suction drain is sited and fat of the natal cleft then is approximated by using an absorbable suture.
The wound is closed with a 3-0 polypropylene suture.The drain remains in situ to time that drainage amount decreases below 20 ml/day.
The suture is removed in the clinic 10 day after surgery.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Limberg Flap Technique
|
Patients are positioned prone.
The area to be excised is mapped-out, and the flap is designed.
The area to be excised is mapped on the skin in a rhomboid form.
The skin incision is deepened to the presacral fascia.
Tissue is removed en bloc.
After removing the rhombic excision, the Limberg fascia cutaneous flap is prepared through the right or left-side gluteus maximus fascia.
The flap is fully mobilized and transposed medially to fulfill the rhombic defect without any tension.
Hemosthasis is accomplished.
A 12F low-suction drain is sited and wound is closed in two layers: the subcutaneous tissue with absorbable suture and the skin with 3/0 polypropylene.
drain remains in situ to time that drainage amount decreases below 20 ml/day.
The suture is removed in the clinic 10 day after surgery.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of life and postoperative pain
Time Frame: within 30 days
|
Determine patient satisfaction factors using the quality of life survey (SF-36 form) on the 10th-30th day and postoperative pain by using post-operative visual analog pain scale on the 2nd-10th day
|
within 30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
early recurrence rate
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay and first 30 days, up to 6 months.
at the end of the study, recurrence rates will be presented for both groups.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Healing time
Time Frame: within 30 days
|
determine wound healing time.
the time until complete recovery will be presented.
|
within 30 days
|
|
operative time
Time Frame: during surgical procedure (day 1)
|
the time between the beginning of the procedure and last skin suture.
|
during surgical procedure (day 1)
|
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: during first week (one week)
|
the time to until discharge.
|
during first week (one week)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1146-50; discussion 1151. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1146.
- Mentes O, Bagci M, Bilgin T, Ozgul O, Ozdemir M. Limberg flap procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: results of 353 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Mar;393(2):185-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0227-9. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
- Nordon IM, Senapati A, Cripps NP. A prospective randomized controlled trial of simple Bascom's technique versus Bascom's cleft closure for the treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2009 Feb;197(2):189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.020. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
- Jamal A, Shamim M, Hashmi F, Qureshi MI. Open excision with secondary healing versus rhomboid excision with Limberg transposition flap in the management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):157-60.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TNEAH-2010GC1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.