Bioequivalence of Bicalutamide New Formulation in Japan

January 10, 2012 updated by: AstraZeneca

Bioequivalence Study of ICI176,334-1 (Bicalutamide New Formulation) in Japanese Healthy Male Subjects - Evaluation of Bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 and Casodex Tablet (80mg)

The purpose of this study is to investigate the bioequivalence of Bicalutamide new formation with Casodex commercial tablet (80mg) in Japanese healthy male subjects

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Bioequivalence study of ICI176,334-1 (Bicalutamide new formulation) in Japanese healthy male subjects - evaluation of bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 and Casodex tablet (80mg)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed and dated, written informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
  • Japanese healthy male subjects aged 20 to 45 years
  • Male subjects should be willing to use barrier contraception ie, condoms, until 3 months after the last dose of investigational product
  • Have a body mass index (BMI) between 17 and 27 kg/m2
  • Eligible based on the physical findings, supine BP, pulse rate, ECG and laboratory assessments, as judged by the investigator(s)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any disease under medical treatment
  • History or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, immunological, blood, endocrine, neurological or mental disease to interfere with absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs judged by investigator(s)
  • Presence of any infectious disease, such as bacteria, virus and fungus
  • Presence of allergic disorder, such as asthma, pollen disease or atopic dermatitis, and judged as necessary any medical treatment
  • Any large surgical history of gastrointestinal tract such as gastric/intestinal resection or suturation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Active 1
34 subjects will receive ICI176,334-1without water
Drug: ICI176,334-1
Subject will receive single dose of ICI176,334-1
EXPERIMENTAL: Active 2
34 subjects will receive ICI176,334-1 with water
Drug: ICI176,334-1
Subject will receive single dose of ICI176,334-1
EXPERIMENTAL: Active 3
34 subjects will receive Casodex 80 mg tablet
Drug: Casodex 80 mg tablet
Subject will receive single dose of Casodex 80 mg tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To investigate the bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 by assessment of Cmax (Maximum Concentration of drug).
Time Frame: Blood samples are taken repeatedly for 72 hours and also taken occasionally up to 672 hours after each dose period
Blood samples are taken repeatedly for 72 hours and also taken occasionally up to 672 hours after each dose period
To investigate the bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 by assessment of AUC (concentration Area Under the Curve).
Time Frame: Blood samples are taken repeatedly for 72 hours and also taken occasionally up to 672 hours after each dose period
Blood samples are taken repeatedly for 72 hours and also taken occasionally up to 672 hours after each dose period
To investigate the bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 by assessment of t1/2 (half time) of bicalutamide
Time Frame: Blood samples are taken repeatedly for 72 hours and also taken occasionally up to 672 hours after each dose period
Blood samples are taken repeatedly for 72 hours and also taken occasionally up to 672 hours after each dose period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess the safety by assessment of adverse event.
Time Frame: Subjects will be monitored for adverse events prior to treatment and up to 42 -49 days (follow-up) after the last dose.
Subjects will be monitored for adverse events prior to treatment and up to 42 -49 days (follow-up) after the last dose.
To assess the safety by assessment of vital signs.
Time Frame: Subjects will be monitored for vital signs prior to treatment and up to 42 -49 days (follow-up) after the last dose.
Subjects will be monitored for vital signs prior to treatment and up to 42 -49 days (follow-up) after the last dose.
To assess the safety by assessment of electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Time Frame: Subjects will be monitored for electrocardiograms(ECGs) prior to treatment and up to 42 -49 days (follow-up) after the last dose.
Subjects will be monitored for electrocardiograms(ECGs) prior to treatment and up to 42 -49 days (follow-up) after the last dose.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 12, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 11, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D6874L00012

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on ICI176,334-1

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings