A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Etravirine Administered in Combination With Other Antiretroviral Agents in Antiretroviral Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients

October 10, 2014 updated by: Janssen R&D Ireland

An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Etravirine (ETR) in Combination With Other Antiretrovirals (ARVs) in Antiretroviral Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Subjects

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the safety and tolerability of etravirine. Etravirine is a type of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) which has shown high activity against wild-type human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1), and HIV strains resistant to other non-nucleotide agents.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention), single arm, multicenter Phase IV study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of etravirine (ETR) in combination with antiretroviral (ARV) therapy other than darunavir (DRV) + ritonavir (rtv). In addition, the antiviral activity and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, and safety of ETR will be assessed. The study will consist of a screening period of maximum 6 weeks, a baseline visit, and a 48-week treatment period. After the end of the treatment period, patients with ongoing adverse events (AEs) will be followed for an additional 4 weeks. At least 200 ARV treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infected patients will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be considered ARV treatment-experienced if they have been on their current stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. The study population will consist of patients who need to change their current HAART regimen due to any of the following reasons: (1) patients experiencing virologic failure (with a screening viral load value >=500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL), or (2) patients switching due to simplification of their current regimen or due to AEs and/or tolerability reasons (with a screening viral load value <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). Patients will receive ETR 200 mg twice daily in combination with an investigator-selected background regimen. In addition to ETR, which needs to be active based on resistance testing, the background regimen should consist of at least 1 active ARV resulting in a treatment regimen with at least 2 active ARVs. The following exceptions to this are: (1) if raltegravir (RAL) or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/rtv) are part of the background regimen, the number of active ARVs in this background regimen should be at least 2; (2) low-dose ritonavir should not be counted as an active ARV. DRV/rtv will not be allowed in the background regimen in order to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of ETR in combination with ARVs other than DRV/rtv. Furthermore, a background regimen consisting of nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) only will not be allowed. The background regimen cannot be modified until the end of the treatment period with the following exception: switches within the ARV class will be allowed for well documented tolerability/toxicity reasons. For patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are deriving clinical benefit from ETR, and to whom ETR is not commercially available in his/her country, is not reimbursed or cannot be accessed from another source (e.g., access program, government program) in the region the patient is living in, the possibility to extend their ETR treatment period will be provided. The ETR tablets are to be taken orally twice daily after a meal. A total daily dose of 400 mg is to be taken for 48 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
211

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Rosario, Argentina
  • France
      • Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
      • Paris, France
  • Guatemala
      • Guatemala, Guatemala
  • Mexico
      • Guadalajara, Mexico
      • Mexico, Mexico
  • Peru
      • Iquitos, Peru
      • Lima, Peru
  • Puerto Rico
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico
  • Romania
      • Brasov, Romania
      • Constanta, Romania
      • Craiova, Romania
      • Timisoara, Romania
  • Russian Federation
      • Krasnodar, Russian Federation
      • Moscow N/A, Russian Federation
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • Sint Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • Smolensk, Russian Federation
      • Volgograd, Russian Federation
      • Voronezh, Russian Federation
  • South Africa
      • Bloemfontein, South Africa
      • Boksburg, South Africa
      • Dundee, South Africa
      • Durban N/A, South Africa
      • Johannesburg, South Africa
      • Newtown, South Africa
      • Port Elizabeth, South Africa
      • Pretoria, South Africa
      • Pretoria N/A, South Africa
      • Westdene Johannesburg Gauteng, South Africa
  • Ukraine
      • Donetsk, Ukraine
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
      • Lugansk, Ukraine
      • Sumy, Ukraine
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States
      • North Hollywood, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Fort Laudersale, Florida, United States
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States
      • Miami, Florida, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States
    • Texas
      • Longview, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented HIV-1 infection
  • Treatment with current stable HAART for at least 8 weeks prior to screening
  • Currently experiencing virologic failure (screening viral load value >=500 HIV-1 RNA copies /mL), or switching due to simplification of their regimen or due to adverse event or tolerability reasons, (screening viral load value <50 HIV-1 RNA copies /mL)
  • Demonstrated sensitivity to etravirine and to at least 1 antiretroviral (ARV) agent in the background regimen, based on the resistance test at screening or resistance history or have previously received treatment with etravirine
  • Patients agree not to have unprotected sex while on the study
  • No currently active AIDS-defining illness
  • Did not take any non-ARV investigational agents within 90 days prior to screening
  • No use of disallowed treatments
  • Adequate liver function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any currently active illness or toxicity due to HIV infection
  • Any active clinically significant disease or findings during screening of medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or outcome of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Etravirine
Drug: Etravirine
Type=exact number, unit=mg, number=100, form=tablet, route=oral use, 2 tablets. Type=exact number, unit=mg, number=200, form=tablet, route=oral use, 1 tablet. The drug is taken twice a day, after meals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants with an Adverse Event (AEs)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants with Virologic Suppression [Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) less than (<) 50 copies/Milliliter (mL)] at Week 48
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot analysis is based on the last observed viral load (VL) data within the Week 48 window: virologic response is defined as HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL (observed case); missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.
48 weeks
Changes in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
Changes in Viral Genotype/Phenotype Over Time
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen R&D Ireland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR017860
  • TMC125IFD3002 (OTHER: Janssen R&D Ireland)
  • 2010-023532-16 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings