Evaluating Diagnostics for Paediatric Tuberculosis by Blood Culture

November 13, 2016 updated by: Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam
Detection of M. tuberculosis in clinical specimens of children has a low sensitivity because specimens are either difficult to collect or contain low levels of M. tuberculosis. Diagnostic criteria are non-specific and culture confirmation is challenging, as sputum samples are not often obtainable from small children and specimens typically have low yield. Although children are typically thought to have paucibacillary disease, they are at greater risk for dissemination of TB. This may allow for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from other bodily fluids than sputum or gastric aspirate, including blood and urine. Unfortunately, little is known about the overall yield from these various specimens. From pilot data collected among adults and children in Tugela Ferry, we know that it is feasible to collect and test various bodily fluid specimens for TB culture. This study aim to test the hypothesis that blood and urine cultures will detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis from children suspected of disseminated TB, and that a proportion of these non-sputum bodily fluids will detect both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis when sputum or gastric culture does not.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among children in developing nations. Symptom-based diagnostic criteria are non-specific and culture confirmation is challenging, as sputum samples are often believed to be to too cumbersome to obtain from small children and specimens typically have low yield due to the paucibacillary nature of pediatric TB. Culture confirmation may be obtained in as few as 10% of cases of suspected pediatric TB. For these reasons, the true extent of the (drug-resistant) TB epidemic in children is unknown. Thus, either clinicians begin empiric treatment without diagnosis or no treatment is given at all. Current laboratory methods, if available at all in resource poor settings, employ smears from expectorated sputa or gastric aspirates which have low sensitivity in children. While more rapid diagnostic techniques such as PCR based tests have been developed, there is still poor sensitivity in children. Improving the diagnosis of pediatric TB must focus on better efforts, including more aggressive strategies to uncover disseminated disease.

Culture confirmation of disseminated disease can be obtained from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), peritoneal and pleural fluid, or purulent material from lymph node aspirates, abscesses or otorrhea. Unfortunately, little is known about the overall yield from these various specimens in children. From pilot data collected among children at NHP, we know that it is feasible to collect and test various bodily fluid specimens for TB culture.

Although WHO guidelines encourage body fluid collection in order to make a diagnosis of TB in children, at present in NHP, blood and urine cultures are not obtained for mycobacterial culture. However, this study seeks to demonstrate that routine investigation of blood and urine will augment the yield of traditional sputum culture for children in whom disseminated disease is more likely. Improved culture confirmation will allow DST and a more accurate description of the drug-resistant TB epidemic for children in the region.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
560

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Vietnam
      • Hanoi, Vietnam
        • National Hospital of Pediatrics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 15 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population is children aged 0-15 years presenting to NHP thought to have TB infection according to inclusion criteria listed in this protocol.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 0-15, presenting at NHP;
  • Unexplained fever for more than 2 weeks; and

  • Any form of TB suspected based on at least two of the following findings:

    • unexplained cough for more than 2 weeks
    • radiographic findings suggestive of tuberculosis.
    • failure to thrive/weight loss
    • enlarged non-tender lymph nodes or lymph node abscess, especially of the neck
    • signs of meningitis with prodromal stage of at least one week
    • HIV positive
    • malnourished
    • TB contact history
    • Clinical judgment treating doctor.
  • Relevant material (sputum or gastric aspirate, blood, and urine) available for microbiological diagnosis.
  • Informed consent obtained from the patient's legal guardian(s).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age >15 years
  • Diagnosed or treated for TB in the past year, received drugs effective against TB in last 3 months.
  • Clinical contra-indications to collect the required study specimens

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Children
Children age 0-15 years presenting to NHP thought to have TB infection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of TB culture
Time Frame: At baseline - day 1 of study
Number of positive TB cultures versus number of positive TB direct smears for expectorate and/or gastric aspirate.
At baseline - day 1 of study
Diagnostic yield of TB culture
Time Frame: At baseline - day 1 of study
Number of positive TB cultures versus number of positive MODS cultures for expectorate and/or gastric aspirate.
At baseline - day 1 of study
Diagnostic yield of urine versus expectorate or gastric aspirate for TB culture
Time Frame: At baseline - day 1 of study
Number of positive TB cultures in urine versus expectorate and/or gastric aspirate.
At baseline - day 1 of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Children's Hospital, Vietnam

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09TB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis Infection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings