The Safety and Efficacy of the Harmonic Scalpel in Neck Dissection

December 6, 2011 updated by: Yonsei University

The Safety and Efficacy of the Harmonic Scalpel in Neck Dissection : A Prospective Randomized Study

Recently, the HS has been used in head and neck surgery as an alternative to conventional hand-tied ligation for hemostasis, which is a time-consuming procedure. Limited data have been published on the evidence of its safety in ND, especially in radical ND. Researchers investigated the safety and efficacy of the Harmonic scalpel (HS) in neck dissection (ND), while using conventional hand-tied ligation to a minimum, in terms of operating time, blood loss, drainage and complications.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
59

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Yoon Woo Koh, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 82-10-9097-0955
  • Email: ywkohent@yuhs.ac

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Hyoung Shin Lee, MD
  • Phone Number: 82-10-2580-6851
  • Email: hsleeent@yuhs.ac

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Recruiting
        • Yonsei University Severance Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • preoperative diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
  • surgery as initial treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cases in which the ND specimen could not be separated from the primary tumor
  • past history of neck surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Harmonic scalpel
Harmonic Focus® Curved Shears (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) was used for vascular control of the surgery regardless of vessel diameter, except when hand-tied or suture ligation was needed for IJV ligation or in case bleeding was not controlled with electrocoagulation
Procedure: Neck dissection with Harmonic scalpel
The Harmonic Focus® Curved Shears (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) was used for vascular control of the surgery regardless of vessel diameter, except when hand-tied or suture ligation was needed for IJV ligation or in case bleeding was not controlled with electrocoagulation
Other Names:
  • Harmonic Focus® Curved Shears
Active Comparator: conventional hand tie ligation
electrocautery was used to control the small vessels and conventional hand-tied ligation was used for large sized arterial, venous, or lymphatic vessels.
Procedure: neck dissection with conventional hand-tie ligation
electrocautery was used to control the small vessels and conventional hand-tied ligation was used for large sized arterial, venous, or lymphatic vessels

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of harvested lymph nodes
Time Frame: when the pathologist examine the specimen which is within 1 week after operation
number of harvested lymph nodes counted from the lymphfatty tissue after neck dissection
when the pathologist examine the specimen which is within 1 week after operation
intra-operative surgery-related complications
Time Frame: complicated events will be monitored during the operation which takes 60 min to 160 min according to the extent of surgery
major vessel laceration, major nerve injury, and penetration into adjacent vital structures such as trachea or esophagus
complicated events will be monitored during the operation which takes 60 min to 160 min according to the extent of surgery
post-operative complications
Time Frame: participants will be followed for 1 month after the surgery
hemorrhage, hematoma, seroma, chylous leakage, and neurologic complications
participants will be followed for 1 month after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operating time
Time Frame: when the neck dissection specimen is removed from the patient at an average time of 60 min to 160 min according to the extent of surgery
The time from the first procedure after subplatysmal flap elevation to removal of neck dissection specimen will be measured
when the neck dissection specimen is removed from the patient at an average time of 60 min to 160 min according to the extent of surgery
intraoperative bleeding
Time Frame: The amount will be estimated at the end of the surgery at an average time of 60 min to 160 min according to the extent of surgery
Estimated blood loss from the collection bottle for the suction drain (ml) will be measured
The amount will be estimated at the end of the surgery at an average time of 60 min to 160 min according to the extent of surgery
total amount of drainage
Time Frame: estimated until the drain tube is removed at the average of 4 to 7 days according to the extent of surgery
total amount of drainage is estimated from the collection bottle of closed drain(ml)
estimated until the drain tube is removed at the average of 4 to 7 days according to the extent of surgery
duration of drain placement
Time Frame: estimated at 6AM daily, until the drain is removed at an average of 4 to 7 days according to the extent of surgery
amount of drain collected in the drain bottle is estimated daily (ml)
estimated at 6AM daily, until the drain is removed at an average of 4 to 7 days according to the extent of surgery
days of hospital stay
Time Frame: documented when the patient leaves the hospital at an average time of 10 to 28 days according to the extent of surgery
duration of hospital stay by days
documented when the patient leaves the hospital at an average time of 10 to 28 days according to the extent of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yonsei University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 8, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1-2011-0014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trials on Neck dissection with Harmonic scalpel

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings