Examining a Common Complaint of Women Who Receive Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer- Cognitive Difficulty

December 12, 2014 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

Neurocognitive Impairment in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer

This longitudinal project will investigate a common complaint of women who receive chemotherapy for breast cancer- cognitive difficulty. The relationships of fatigue, stress, and depression to cognitive difficulties will be examined. The findings should lead to interventions to decrease the effects of these problematic side effects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Most women with breast cancer are diagnosed in the early stages of the disease (Stage I and II) and 90% of these can expect to survive at least 5 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer are often associated with complaints of cognitive changes, mostly the inability to concentrate and memory lapses that may persist in some women long after chemotherapy has ended. These changes are frequently accompanied by reports of a triad of behavioral conditions: fatigue, increased stress, and depressive symptoms. Biologically, cytokine release patterns play an important role in regulation of the immune system and normal CNS function, including neural cell repair and metabolism of neurotransmitters-both critical for normal cognitive functioning. Thus, the theoretical underpinnings of this research are embedded in the biobehavioral (mind-body) model which characterizes the multidimensional interactions among the mind, neuroendocrine, and immune systems. The purpose of this prospective, longitudinal project of 100 women is to determine whether there are differences in cognitive functioning and related behavioral conditions (fatigue, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms) in women in each of 3 groups: those with early stage BC treated with surgery and chemotherapy, women with early stage BC treated with surgery and without chemotherapy and an age-gender-education-matched healthy cohort without cancer. The primary aim of the project is to examine the relationships among fatigue, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms and neurocognitive impairment. A secondary aim is to explore the relationships among key behavioral and biological markers that may explain underlying mechanisms for development of neurocognitive impairment. In particular, this project will explore pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine patterns and their potential associations with neurocognitive functioning. For the primary aim, the mixed linear model will be used to test for differences between the groups. For analysis of the secondary aim variable reduction stage and correlation will be used. The strength of this project is its biobehavioral approach to discerning underlying mechanisms of neurocognitive impairment in women with early stage BC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, three other common behavioral conditions associated with BC and/or chemotherapy, fatigue, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms, will be evaluated for their potentially confounding effects on cognitive function.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virnigia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants in the two BC groups will be recruited from the Massey Cancer Center (MCC) clinical sites in Richmond, VA. Healthy volunteers will be recruited throughout the VCU Health System and through women's groups throughout the greater Richmond, VA area. The PI will provide physicians and clinical nurses an overview of the research and work with them to identify potential project participants. Participants will be provided oral and written information about the research and given an opportunity to ask questions or discuss the project with family or significant others.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • read and speak English
  • be physically able to take the computerized test (press the keyboard space bar and numerical keys "1" and "2" without difficulty)
  • have an ECOG Performance Status score < 2.154
  • capable of providing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychiatric impairment, such as organic brain disorders, mental retardation, active psychoses or dissociative disorders, or unstable and/or severe depressive illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
women with stage I or II BC with adjuvant chemotherapy

women with Stage I or II BC who

  1. have undergone surgical treatment (biopsy, lumpectomy or mastectomy) and;
  2. will be receiving adjuvant chemotherapy
Other: Neurocognitive impairment observation
None - observational
women with Stage I or II BC without adjuvant therapy

Women with stage I or II BC who

  1. Have undergone surgical treatment (biopsy, lumpectomy or mastectomy) \
  2. will not be receiving adjuvant chemotherapy
Other: Neurocognitive impairment observation
None - observational
Healthy control
healthy education-age-matched women without cancer
Other: Neurocognitive impairment observation
None - observational

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
test neurocognitive function, using CNSVS, of the three groups while adjusting for fatigue, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
test for neurocognitive function, using CNSVS, of the three groups while adjusting for fatigue, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms.
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
test for neurocognitive function, using CNSVS, of the three groups while adjusting for fatigue, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms.
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
test level of inflammatory markers in order to explore the relationships between key behavioral and biological markers that may explain underlying mechanisms for development of neurocognitive impairment (NI).
Time Frame: baseline, month 4 and month 9
baseline, month 4 and month 9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mary Jo Grapp, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 12321
  • 5P30NR011403 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings