Continuous GlucoseMonitor for Measurement of Blood Glucose Level (ContAssGlu)

December 19, 2013 updated by: Susanne Frankenhauser

A Prospective Clinical Trial on Agreement to Evaluate the GlucoseMonitor, a Novel Device for Continuous Assessment of Blood Glucose Levels, in Comparison With the RAPIDLab® 1265 Blood Gas Analyser (ContAssGlu)

This study will be the first study in which the new central venous microdialysis-based continuous glucose monitoring system (Continuous GlucoseMonitor) is used to investigate the performance of this Continuous GlucoseMonitor, as the measurements will be compared with a point of care reference (RAPIDLab® 1265 blood gas analyser). Further important points are also much less blood samplings / blood loss for the patient and personnel costs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The current standard for measuring blood glucose concentrations on ICU is to manually draw a blood sample from an arterial catheter and analyse the sample using a point of care blood gas analyser. This technique has several disadvantages as causes considerable blood loss and does not produce a continuous blood glucose profile and it is labour intensive (multiple samples over time are needed to follow the changes in blood glucose concentration). The monitoring system (Continuous GlucoseMonitor) based on the microdialysis technique has the advantage that not blood, but a physiological fluid such as saline is used as test medium. In brief, a physiological fluid, called the perfusate is continuously perfused through the microdialysis probe. At the membrane of the probe, glucose (as other low-molecular weight molecules) diffuses from the surrounding sample into the perfusate, now called dialysate, and is transported outside the probe for ex vivo monitoring.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Heidelberg, Germany, D-69120
        • University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Anaesthesiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having undergone major abdominal and predominantly pancreatic surgery due to any reason
  • expected to be in intensive care for at least 8 hours following index surgery
  • need for close monitoring of blood glucose levels postoperatively
  • having received a two-lumen central venous catheter for anaesthesia and operative purposes
  • antibiotic prophylaxis (e.g. mezlocillin 4.0g and metronidazole 500mg)
  • received routine perioperative thromboembolic prophylaxis medication (e.g. low-molecular-weight-heparin, heparin)
  • aged at least 18 up to 80 years
  • Capable of giving informed consent (written informed consent, signed and dated)
  • successful central venous catheter in place (at least double lumen)
  • one lumen of the central venous catheter will not be used postoperatively for routine infusion therapy and routine application of medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known history of thrombosis, embolism; vascular obliteration
  • known bleeding disorders, e.g. thrombocytosis
  • known history of acute or chronic renal failure and patients on renal replacement therapy (dialysis, hemofiltration)
  • known history of acute or chronic heart failure
  • evidence of acute postoperative hyperhydration (pulmonary congestion)
  • known history of acquired immune deficiency syndrome
  • patients receiving immune suppressive therapy
  • any signs for acute or chronic infection
  • contraindication for insertion of a central venous catheter
  • contraindication for perioperative thromboembolic prophylaxis medication (e.g. low-molecular-weight-heparin, heparin)
  • exceedance the flushing infusion volume (500 mL per 24 hours)
  • pregnancy and lactation
  • Participation in another parallel clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: GlucoseMonitor
Device: continuous GlucoseMonitor
The blood glucose and blood lactate levels will be taken continuously by the Continuous GlucoseMonitor and will be recorded twelve times.
Other Names:
  • blood glucose examination stand

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eight hours measurement after initial referencing
Time Frame: eight hours after initial referencing
Agreement at point of care, i.e. agreement between the readings from the Continuous GlucoseMonitor taken eight hours after initial referencing and the measurement results from the RAPIDLab® 1265 blood gas analyser taken at the same time
eight hours after initial referencing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
one and two (short) and three to eight (mid) deterioration
Time Frame: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven and eight hours
Short (one and two hour) and mid term (three to eight hour) deterioration in agreement, i.e. agreement between the readings from the Continuous GlucoseMonitor taken one and two and three, four, five, six, seven as well as eight hours after initial referencing and the measurement results from the RAPIDLab® 1265 blood gas analyser taken at the same time
one, two, three, four, five, six, seven and eight hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Susanne Frankenhauser

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Johann Motsch, Prof. Dr., University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Anaesthesiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ContAssGlu

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings