Comparison of Two Neuromuscular Anesthetics Reversal in Obese Patient Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

June 24, 2014 updated by: Assuta Hospital Systems
The study is a prospective, single center, double arm study aiming at the comparison of 2 commercial neuromuscular block reversal drugs: Neostigmine (Cooper S.A.) and Sugammadex (MSD). A faster recovery from neuromuscular block is expected for patients receiving Sugammadex and this protocol is of high importance for anesthesia of morbid obese patients during bariatric surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Tel Aviv, Israel
        • Assuta Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects for the study will be recruited from patients within the community who have sought treatment for morbid obesity by bariatric surgery, are qualified for the surgery and meet all of the eligibility criteria listed below.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Morbidly obese male or female patients in the age 20-65 that are candidates for bariatric surgery.
  2. Patients that can read and understand the fundamental nature of the clinical protocol.
  3. Patients must sign the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients treated with drugs that might interact with Rocuronium.
  2. Patients with history of malignant hyperthermia.
  3. Patients with significant renal disease.
  4. Patients with a known allergy to one of the drugs used during anesthesia.
  5. Patients with known muscular disease.
  6. Patients with severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA>2)
  7. Breast feeding patients
  8. Patients refusing to follow the clinical protocol.
  9. Patients participating in a different clinical trial.
  10. Patients refusing to sign the Informed Consent Form
  11. Physician's objection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients recieving Sugammadex
Sugammadex Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg body.
Drug: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine
  • Sugammadex Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg body.
  • Neostigmine Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg body and atropine 0.1 mg/kg body.
Patients recieving Neostigmine
Neostigmine Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg body and atropine 0.1 mg/kg body.
Drug: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine
  • Sugammadex Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg body.
  • Neostigmine Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg body and atropine 0.1 mg/kg body.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of Sugammadex reversal - number of drug-related adverse events with Sugammadex <= that of Neostigmine.
Time Frame: Monitoring nueromuscular reaction from end of anesthesia recovery (in the OR) intil patient is released from hospital (48-72 h post surgery)
The number of drug-related adverse events using Sugammadex is smaller or equal to those using Neostigmine.
Monitoring nueromuscular reaction from end of anesthesia recovery (in the OR) intil patient is released from hospital (48-72 h post surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of Sugammadex for neuromuscular anaesthesia reversal higher patient satisfaction compared to Neostigmine.
Time Frame: Monitoring nueromuscular reaction from end of anesthesia recovery (in the OR) intil patient is released from hospital (48-72 h post surgery)
Neuromuscular anesthesia reversal with Sugammdex is fast, comfortable and well accepted by the patients. Time of recovery from anesthesia and patient satisfaction will be compared for the two groups.
Monitoring nueromuscular reaction from end of anesthesia recovery (in the OR) intil patient is released from hospital (48-72 h post surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assuta Hospital Systems

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Asnat Raziel, MD, Medical Director, ICBS-Israeli Center for Bariatric Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AR-002-12

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings