Bone Healing After Dental Extraction in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women Treated With Alendronate Per os Weekly (BOCOMEDEN)

August 29, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Bone Healing After Dental Extraction in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women Treated With Alendronate Per os (70 mg Weekly)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the oral alendronate treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis could be a risk factor for jaw bone healing after dental extraction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Alendronate is the main oral bisphosphonate used in the treatment and the prevention of the postmenopausal osteoporosis because of its high antiresorbant ability for bone tissue. Alendronate delayed bone healing after dental extraction on animals models, murine as canine. Anti-angiogenic and anti-osteoclastic characteristics are suggested to explain this phenomenon. There is no available data in human and it is now well known that bisphosphonates are involved in the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaws even if this major adverse effect seems to be very seldom with oral alendronate. Moreover, bisphosphonate showed toxicity for oral mucosal cells. The main aim of this study is to quantify the impact of oral alendronate weekly treatment on bone and mucosa healing after dental extraction in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. A secondary aim is to investigate a panel of 50 peptids potentially involved in bone and mucosal healing and to detect changes in their rates by salivary proteomic approach. The investigators hope so identify salivary biomarkers of bone and/or mucosa healing in these women.

Our hypothesis is that after dental extraction, bone healing could be delayed in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with oral weekly alendronate (BP+ group) versus matched osteoporotic women untreated with bisphosphonates (BP- group).

This is a prospective and multicentric (17 investigation centers dispatched in France) study including 140 osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated weekly with oral bisphosphonates (BP+ group) and 140 osteoporotic postmenopausal women untreated with bisphosphonates (BP- group). This is a clinical follow-up study (T0, T0 + 7, T0 + 30, T0 + 90 days), a radiological study (T0, T0 + 30, T0 + 90 days), and a salivary proteomic study (T0, T0 + 30, T0 + 90 days). This is a 4 years study starting in april 2012 (anticipated date).

The main investigated parameters are:

  • Bone healing: Bone filling rate (in %) of the post-extractional alveolar socket (BFR) at T0, T0 + 30 and T0 + 90 days by a radiographic approach.
  • Mucosa healing: mucosal injury by metric approach at T0 and T0 + 30 days.
  • Salivary biomarkers: Fifty peptides by proteomic approach at T0 and T0 + 30 days;

The investigators expect that this study will allow us to build a reference scale of bone and mucosa healing in osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated weekly by oral alendronate. This scale will be a helpful tool for dental physicians. The investigators hope also to identify salivary biomarkers variations to make a diagnosis and a prognosis tool of worse bone healing in these patients.

Perspectives of this study is to constitute a national network of deleterious effect on bone healing in such women patients and to up-date guidelines in this area.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nantes, France, 44042
        • Hotel-Dieu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal osteoporotic women
  • Treated with alendronate per os (70 pg weekly) for BP+ experimental group and untreated with this therapy for the BP
  • Control group
  • Subjected to single root tooth extraction- 45 to 70 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Maxillofacial irradiations
  • Dental extraction with adjunction of material interfering with bone healing
  • Severe pathologies inconsistent with this study
  • Bisphosphonate treatment for BP- control group
  • Women treated with denosumab (prolia®)
  • Women already included to an another dental extraction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Women treated by bisphosphonate
Postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated by alendronate 70 mg weekly per os
Procedure: Dental extraction
3 dental radiographies realised immediately, then 30 days, then 90 days after dental extraction
Sham Comparator: Women didn't treat by bisphosphonate
Postmenopausal osteoporotic women untreated by bisphosphonates
Procedure: Dental extraction
3 dental radiographies realised immediately, then 30 days, then 90 days after dental extraction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alveolar socket filled by new bone
Time Frame: 3 months after extraction
Rate in % of the alveolar socket filled by new bone
3 months after extraction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mucosal injury
Time Frame: 7 days after extraction
Direct measure of mucosal injury wtih a mini-electronic caliper
7 days after extraction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Unité de Recherche Clinique Necker Cochin, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Christian ROUX, MD, PhD, Hôpital Cochin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 19, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 23, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 5, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P110126

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Healing After Dental Extraction

Clinical Trials on Dental extraction

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings