A Large Randomized Trial of Vitamin D, Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cognitive Decline (VITAL-Cog)

March 30, 2023 updated by: Jae Hee Kang, Brigham and Women's Hospital
The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL; NCT 01169259) is an ongoing randomized clinical trial in 25,875 U.S. men and women investigating whether taking daily dietary supplements of vitamin D3 (2000 IU) or omega-3 fatty acids (Omacor® fish oil, 1 gram) reduces the risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and stroke in people who do not have a prior history of these illnesses. This ancillary study is being conducted among participants in VITAL and will examine whether vitamin D or fish oil is associated with cognitive decline in 3000 older participants of VITAL.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary aim of annual rate of cognitive decline. Secondary aims will be addressed in sub-set of participants: 1) among participants, African-American race (African-Americans have high risk of Vitamin D deficiency) modifies effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on cognitive decline; 2) among a subset of participants, baseline plasma levels of vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids modify agent effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3424

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Participants in VITAL (NCT 01169259) who meet the following criteria are eligible to participate in this ancillary study:

  1. are aged 60 or more
  2. have no hearing impairment
  3. indicate a willingness on the run-in phase to participate in a cognitive sub-study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: ACTIVE Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids
ACTIVE Vitamin D = Vitamin D3, one 2000 IU capsule/day; ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids = Omacor, one 1-gram capsule/day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Dietary supplement: vitamin D3
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 2000 IU per day
Other Names:
  • cholecalciferol
Drug: omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil)
Omacor, 1 capsule per day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Active Comparator: ACTIVE Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids
ACTIVE Vitamin D = Vitamin D3, one 2000 IU capsule/day; PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids, one capsule/day
Dietary supplement: Fish oil placebo
Fish oil placebo
Dietary supplement: vitamin D3
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 2000 IU per day
Other Names:
  • cholecalciferol
Active Comparator: PLACEBO Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids
PLACEBO Vitamin D, one capsule/day; ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids = Omacor, one 1-gram capsule/day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Dietary supplement: Vitamin D3 placebo
Vitamin D placebo
Drug: omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil)
Omacor, 1 capsule per day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Placebo Comparator: PLACEBO Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids
PLACEBO Vitamin D, one capsule/day; PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids, one capsule/day
Dietary supplement: Vitamin D3 placebo
Vitamin D placebo
Dietary supplement: Fish oil placebo
Fish oil placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Global Composite Score for Cognitive Decline
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years).
We administered by telephone, eight cognitive tests (1.Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS); 2.Delayed recall of the TICS 10-word list; 3.East Boston Memory Test (EBMT); 4.Delayed recall of the EBMT; 5.Category fluency test (animal naming test); 6.Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT-Part A); 7. OTMT-Part B; 8.Digit span backwards). The primary endpoint was the change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) in GLOBAL COMPOSITE SCORE (average of Z-scores of component tests); for both baseline and last assessment Z-scores, a mean Z-score of 0 represents the mean and the higher the Z-score, the better the overall cognitive performance across the tests. The primary endpoint was a difference of two Z-scores, so a value of 0 means no change over time, a positive value means an increase over time and a negative value means a decrease (or "decline") over time, for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of -0.004.
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Episodic Memory Score for Cognitive Decline
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
The outcome measure was change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) in the EPISODIC MEMORY SCORE combining z-scores of 4 tests: the immediate and delayed recalls of both the East Boston Memory Test (EBMT) and the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) 10-word list; for both baseline and last assessment Z-scores, a mean Z-score of 0 represents the mean and the higher the Z-score, the better the overall cognitive performance across the tests. The primary endpoint was a difference of two Z-scores, so a value of 0 means no change over time, a positive value means an increase over time and a negative value means a decrease (or "decline") over time, for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of -0.01.
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
Change in Executive Function Score for Cognitive Decline
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
The outcome measure is change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) in the EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SCORE combining z-scores of 4 tests: category fluency (animal naming), digit span backwards, and Oral Trails Making Test (OTMT)-Part A and OTMT-Part B; for both baseline and last assessment Z-scores, a mean Z-score of 0 represents the mean and the higher the Z-score, the better the overall cognitive performance across the tests. The primary endpoint was a difference of two Z-scores, so a value of 0 means no change over time, a positive value means an increase over time and a negative value means a decrease (or "decline") over time, for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of +0.006.
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
Change in Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) for Cognitive Decline.
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
Change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) on the TICS (0-41 points), a measure of general cognition. A higher value on the TICS represents better cognitive performance; for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of -0.05
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 14, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 8, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2010P-000769
  • R01AG036755 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings