A Large Randomized Trial of Vitamin D, Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cognitive Decline (VITAL-Cog)

March 30, 2023 updated by: Jae Hee Kang, Brigham and Women's Hospital
The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL; NCT 01169259) is an ongoing randomized clinical trial in 25,875 U.S. men and women investigating whether taking daily dietary supplements of vitamin D3 (2000 IU) or omega-3 fatty acids (Omacor® fish oil, 1 gram) reduces the risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and stroke in people who do not have a prior history of these illnesses. This ancillary study is being conducted among participants in VITAL and will examine whether vitamin D or fish oil is associated with cognitive decline in 3000 older participants of VITAL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary aim of annual rate of cognitive decline. Secondary aims will be addressed in sub-set of participants: 1) among participants, African-American race (African-Americans have high risk of Vitamin D deficiency) modifies effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on cognitive decline; 2) among a subset of participants, baseline plasma levels of vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids modify agent effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3424

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Participants in VITAL (NCT 01169259) who meet the following criteria are eligible to participate in this ancillary study:

  1. are aged 60 or more
  2. have no hearing impairment
  3. indicate a willingness on the run-in phase to participate in a cognitive sub-study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ACTIVE Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids
ACTIVE Vitamin D = Vitamin D3, one 2000 IU capsule/day; ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids = Omacor, one 1-gram capsule/day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 2000 IU per day
Other Names:
  • cholecalciferol
Omacor, 1 capsule per day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Active Comparator: ACTIVE Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids
ACTIVE Vitamin D = Vitamin D3, one 2000 IU capsule/day; PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids, one capsule/day
Fish oil placebo
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 2000 IU per day
Other Names:
  • cholecalciferol
Active Comparator: PLACEBO Vitamin D + ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids
PLACEBO Vitamin D, one capsule/day; ACTIVE Omega-3 Fatty Acids = Omacor, one 1-gram capsule/day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Vitamin D placebo
Omacor, 1 capsule per day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]).
Placebo Comparator: PLACEBO Vitamin D + PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids
PLACEBO Vitamin D, one capsule/day; PLACEBO Omega-3 Fatty Acids, one capsule/day
Vitamin D placebo
Fish oil placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Global Composite Score for Cognitive Decline
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years).
We administered by telephone, eight cognitive tests (1.Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS); 2.Delayed recall of the TICS 10-word list; 3.East Boston Memory Test (EBMT); 4.Delayed recall of the EBMT; 5.Category fluency test (animal naming test); 6.Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT-Part A); 7. OTMT-Part B; 8.Digit span backwards). The primary endpoint was the change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) in GLOBAL COMPOSITE SCORE (average of Z-scores of component tests); for both baseline and last assessment Z-scores, a mean Z-score of 0 represents the mean and the higher the Z-score, the better the overall cognitive performance across the tests. The primary endpoint was a difference of two Z-scores, so a value of 0 means no change over time, a positive value means an increase over time and a negative value means a decrease (or "decline") over time, for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of -0.004.
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Episodic Memory Score for Cognitive Decline
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
The outcome measure was change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) in the EPISODIC MEMORY SCORE combining z-scores of 4 tests: the immediate and delayed recalls of both the East Boston Memory Test (EBMT) and the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) 10-word list; for both baseline and last assessment Z-scores, a mean Z-score of 0 represents the mean and the higher the Z-score, the better the overall cognitive performance across the tests. The primary endpoint was a difference of two Z-scores, so a value of 0 means no change over time, a positive value means an increase over time and a negative value means a decrease (or "decline") over time, for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of -0.01.
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
Change in Executive Function Score for Cognitive Decline
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
The outcome measure is change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) in the EXECUTIVE FUNCTION SCORE combining z-scores of 4 tests: category fluency (animal naming), digit span backwards, and Oral Trails Making Test (OTMT)-Part A and OTMT-Part B; for both baseline and last assessment Z-scores, a mean Z-score of 0 represents the mean and the higher the Z-score, the better the overall cognitive performance across the tests. The primary endpoint was a difference of two Z-scores, so a value of 0 means no change over time, a positive value means an increase over time and a negative value means a decrease (or "decline") over time, for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of +0.006.
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
Change in Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) for Cognitive Decline.
Time Frame: Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)
Change over time (last assessment score minus the baseline assessment score) on the TICS (0-41 points), a measure of general cognition. A higher value on the TICS represents better cognitive performance; for clinical significance, 1 year of aging is associated with a primary endpoint value of -0.05
Change over two assessments (baseline, 2.8 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D3 placebo

Subscribe