Pharmacogenomics of Methadone in Spine Fusion Surgery
The Influence of Pharmacogenetics on Methadone Dose, Safety, and Outcomes After Spine Fusion
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA physical status I, II, and III
- male and non-pregnant female
- English-speaking
- undergoing elective < 3 vertebral level lumbar spine fusion (with and without interbody fusion)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of more than the equivalent of 20 mg of IV morphine/24 hr in the past 2 weeks
- history of substance abuse at any time in the past
- known QT prolongation
- Non-elective operations (i.e., cancer or trauma)
- severe hepatic impairment (serum albumin <3.0 g/dL, history of liver disease)
- pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Methadone 0.5 mg/kg
|
Methadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Methadone 0.4 mg/kg
|
Methadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Methadone 0.3 mg/kg
|
Methadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Methadone 0.2 mg/kg
|
Methadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Methadone 0.15 mg/kg
|
Methadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Time until initial request for postoperative analgesic.
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The determination of minimum effective analgesic concentration of methadone.
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Postoperative pain at rest and with movement (numerical rating scale, NRS)
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
The number of occurrences of ventilatory depression during each evaluation interval
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Nausea and vomiting: number of rescue antiemetic doses and episodes of emesis
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Level of sedation (modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale, modified OAA/S scale)
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Occurence of pruritis
Time Frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Algometry to assess pain tolerance
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Degree of bother associated with opioid-related adverse effects: Opioid-related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Quality of Recovery: Quality of Recovery-40 score
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Patient analgesic satisfaction
Time Frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
|
|
Assessment of back condition pre and post-operatively
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks and 3 months post-operatively
|
Pre-operatively, 6 weeks and 3 months post-operatively
|
|
|
Effects of common opioid related metabolic pathway polymorphisms on methadone's dose response relationships for analgesia and side effects
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
CYP2B6 Polymorphism effect on
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Pupillometry for assessment of sedation
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dhanesh K. Gupta, M.D., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51.
- Apfelbaum JL, Gan TJ, Zhao S, Hanna DB, Chen C. Reliability and validity of the perioperative opioid-related symptom distress scale. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):699-709. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000133143.60584.38.
- Chou WY, Wang CH, Liu PH, Liu CC, Tseng CC, Jawan B. Human opioid receptor A118G polymorphism affects intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 2006 Aug;105(2):334-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200608000-00016.
- Romberg RR, Olofsen E, Bijl H, Taschner PE, Teppema LJ, Sarton EY, van Kleef JW, Dahan A. Polymorphism of mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1:c.118A>G) does not protect against opioid-induced respiratory depression despite reduced analgesic response. Anesthesiology. 2005 Mar;102(3):522-30. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200503000-00008.
- Gottschalk A, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC. Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):218-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
- Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
- Gourlay GK, Wilson PR, Glynn CJ. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of methadone during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1982 Dec;57(6):458-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198212000-00005. No abstract available.
- Chui PT, Gin T. A double-blind randomised trial comparing postoperative analgesia after perioperative loading doses of methadone or morphine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992 Feb;20(1):46-51. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000109.
- Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):67-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.
- Upton RN, Semple TJ, Macintyre PE. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):225-44. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00005.
- Jadad AR, Browman GP. The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation. JAMA. 1995 Dec 20;274(23):1870-3.
- Taylor S, Kirton OC, Staff I, Kozol RA. Postoperative day one: a high risk period for respiratory events. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.015.
- Taylor S, Voytovich AE, Kozol RA. Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control? Am J Surg. 2003 Nov;186(5):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021.
- Liu N, Kuhlman G, Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Levron JC, Fischler M. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of intrathecal morphine, sufentanil and their combination versus IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00007.
- Joris J, Kaba A, Lamy M. Transition between anesthesia and post-operative analgesia: relevance of intra-operative administration of analgesics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2001;52(3):271-9.
- Carroll IR, Angst MS, Clark JD. Management of perioperative pain in patients chronically consuming opioids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):576-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.009.
- Yaksh TL, Hua XY, Kalcheva I, Nozaki-Taguchi N, Marsala M. The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):7680-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7680.
- Parker RK, Holtmann B, White PF. Effects of a nighttime opioid infusion with PCA therapy on patient comfort and analgesic requirements after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 1992 Mar;76(3):362-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199203000-00007.
- van Dorp EL, Kest B, Kowalczyk WJ, Morariu AM, Waxman AR, Arout CA, Dahan A, Sarton EY. Morphine-6beta-glucuronide rapidly increases pain sensitivity independently of opioid receptor activity in mice and humans. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1356-63. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a105de.
- Egan TD, Huizinga B, Gupta SK, Jaarsma RL, Sperry RJ, Yee JB, Muir KT. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics in obese versus lean patients. Anesthesiology. 1998 Sep;89(3):562-73. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809000-00004.
- Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Bernstein DP. Estimating ideal body weight--a new formula. Obes Surg. 2005 Aug;15(7):1082-3. doi: 10.1381/0960892054621350.
- Bowdle TA, Even A, Shen DD, Swardstrom M. Methadone for the induction of anesthesia: plasma histamine concentration, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jun;98(6):1692-1697. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000114085.20751.20.
- Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H. Measuring health status (quality of recovery?) after anesthesia and surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):281. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00062. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Spinal Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Spinal Curvatures
- Scoliosis
- Kyphosis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Respiratory System Agents
- Antitussive Agents
- Methadone
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00064915
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.