Using Entecavir to Reduce Hepatitis in Highly Viremic HBV Patients During Anti-tuberculous Treatment (HBV)

November 7, 2012 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Prophylactic Use of Entecavir to Reduce Hepatitis Flare in Highly Viremic HBV Patients With Active Tuberculosis Receiving Anti-tuberculous Treatment

Hepatitis during anti-tuberculous treatment (HATT) has been an obstacle in managing TB patients, especially in those with viral hepatitis. A previous study revealed the risk of HATT is significantly higher in TB patients with high serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level than those with low HBV DNA level. Based on these findings, we thus hypothesize that the risk of HATT in TB patients with high baseline serum HBV DNA level can be reduced by concomitant use of anti-HBV agent. In this proposal, we will conduct a prospective randomized clinical study to assess the reduction of HATT risk by using entecavir in TB patients with high baseline serum HBV DNA level, and to evaluate the risk of other treatment-related adverse events in two hospitals.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the important infectious diseases worldwide. Timely implementation of optimized anti-tuberculous therapy is still the mainstay to prevent further transmission of TB. However, hepatitis during anti-tuberculous treatment (HATT) has been an obstacle in managing TB patients, especially in those with viral hepatitis. A previous study revealed the risk of HATT is significantly higher in TB patients with high serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level than those with low HBV DNA level (39% vs. 11%), the latter cases have a similar risk of HATT as those without viral hepatitis (14%). Based on these findings, we thus hypothesize that the risk of HATT in TB patients with high baseline serum HBV DNA level can be reduced by concomitant use of anti-HBV agent. In this proposal, we will conduct a prospective randomized clinical study to assess the reduction of HATT risk by using entecavir in TB patients with high baseline serum HBV DNA level, and to evaluate the risk of other treatment-related adverse events in two hospitals. From January 2012 to June 2014, subjects with culture-confirmed TB and aged from 18 to 80 with high serum HBV viral load prior to anti-tuberculous treatment will be enrolled and randomized into either study or control group. High serum HBV viral load is defined as >20,000 and >2,000 IU/mL for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative subjects, respectively. In addition to standard anti-tuberculous treatment, subjects in the study group will receive entecavir (BARACLUDE®) 0.5 mg per day during anti-tuberculous treatment and for 6 months after stopping anti-tuberculous treatment. Hemogram, liver function, renal function, and serum HBV viral load will be regularly monitored to detect the development of HATT and other adverse events. In this study, HATT is defined as fulfilling anyone of the following conditions: (1) increase in serum AST and/or ALT level of >3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) with symptoms if baseline liver function is normal; (2) increase in serum AST and/or ALT level of >5 times ULN without symptoms if baseline liver function is normal; (3) increase in serum AST and/or ALT level of >2 times baseline if baseline liver function is abnormal; and (4) increase in serum total bilirubin level of > 2.5 mg/dL.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jann-Yuan Wang, Ph.D
  • Phone Number: 63565 886-2-23123456
  • Email: jywang@ntu.edu.tw

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • culture-confirmed tuberculosis
  • serology-confirmed chronic HBV infection without flare-up at present (IgM Anti-HBc-negative and either HBsAg-positive or Anti-HBc-positive)
  • high serum HBV viral load, defined as >20,000 and >2,000 IU/mL for HBeAg positive and HBeAg negative patients, respectively
  • serum AST and/or ALT level <2 times ULN
  • serum level of total bilirubin <2.0 mg/dL
  • willing to receive directly observed therapy, short course (DOTs)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Target Disease Exceptions: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis D virus (HDV) co-infection, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (defined as simultaneous resistant to isoniazid and rifampin)

  • Medical History and Concurrent Diseases

    1. . ever receiving anti-viral therapy for HBV
    2. . alcoholism or presence of hepatic disease other than hepatitis B
    3. . life expectancy less than 1 year

  • Sex and Reproductive Status

    1. . Pregnancy
    2. . Breast-feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Entecavir group
Study treatment for only treatment group: entecavir (BARACLUDE®) 0.5 mg per day during and within 6 months after anti-tuberculous treatment.
Drug: entecavir (BARACLUDE®)
entecavir 0.5 mg per day during and within 6 months after anti-tuberculous treatment
Other Names:
  • BARACLUDE®
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
Not receiving entecavir (BARACLUDE®)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of hepatitis
Time Frame: 1 year after randomization
the reduction in the incidence of hepatitis during anti-tuberculous treatment by using entecavir in patients with high serum HBV viral load.
1 year after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV viral load
Time Frame: 1 year after randomization
the reduction in HBV viral load in treatment group comparing with control group.
1 year after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jann-Yuan Wang, Ph.D., National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NTUH-IRB-201109046MB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings