Combined CXL//UV and PRK or LASIK in Forme Fruste Keratoconus or Eyes With Potential Risk of Ectasia

August 20, 2015 updated by: Cxlusa

Combined Collagen Crosslinking/Ultraviolet-A and Photorefractive Keratectomy or LASIK in Forme Fruste Keratoconus or Eyes With Potentially Elevated Risk of Ectasia

This study is being performed to evaluate the efficacy of ultraviolet-A (UVA)-induced cross-linking of corneal collagen (CXL) in strengthening and optimizing the biomechanical and biochemical stability of the cornea in patients with fruste keratoconus (FFKC), corneas that are suspicious for FFKC and corneas thought to be at higher risk of developing ectasia that will be undergoing laser vision correction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is being performed to evaluate the efficacy of ultraviolet-A (UVA)-induced cross-linking of corneal collagen (CXL) in strengthening and optimizing the biomechanical and biochemical stability of the cornea in patients with fruste keratoconus (FFKC), corneas that are suspicious for FFKC and corneas thought to be at higher risk of developing ectasia that will be undergoing laser vision correction. CXL is thought to augment the tectonic strength of the cornea by using UVA light and the photo-mediator riboflavin. The purpose of this non-randomized study is to compare the visual results of patients who are suspicious for having an increased risk of ectasia with laser vision correction compared to a group of patients that does not have these risk factors. All excimer laser ophthalmic procedures currently being performed to correct myopia, hyperopia or astigmatism with FDA approved excimer lasers do so by removing corneal tissue and thereby potentially weakening the cornea biomechanically. This can result in ectasia even in patients without pre-existing risk factors.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85260
        • Schwartz Laser Eye Center
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States
        • Clear View Eye & Laser Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States
        • The Center for Excellence in Eye Care
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20852
        • TLC Laser Eye Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
        • Talamo Laser Eye Center
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
        • Minnesota Eye Consultants
    • Ohio
      • Breckville, Ohio, United States
        • Cleveland Eye Clinic
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • TLC Laser Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Primary Care Clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Up to 4 potential risk factors for ectasia
  • A. Abnormal Topography: Consistent with forme fruste keratoconus, forme fruste pellucid marginal degeneration, asymmetric astigmatism, or increased posterior float/posterior corneal surface shape.
  • B. Corneal thickness of 500 microns or less, as measured by ultrasound, Orbscan, or Pentacam
  • C. Age 18 to 25
  • D. Planned Residual stromal bed between 250 and 300 microns
  • Ability to provide written informed consent
  • Likely to complete all study visits
  • Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/25 in each eye
  • Patients with and without previous laser vision correction are eligible for participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Frank keratoconus, Pellucid, or Post-LASIK ectasia
  • Less than 20/30 BSCVA in either eye
  • Corneal scarring that markedly affects vision
  • Contraindications to any study medications or their components
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Active Herpes Corneal Disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
low risk subjects for developing post-operative ectasia
Patients undergoing vision correction surgery who are not at a higher risk for developing post-op ectasia
Device: Corneal Cross-Linking
Corneal cross-linking procedure conducted during vision correction surgery.
Drug: Riboflavin
Riboflavin will be instilled prior to corneal cross linking.
Subjects at Risk for Ectasia
Patients undergoing vision correction surgery who are at a higher risk for developing post-operative ectasia
Device: Corneal Cross-Linking
Corneal cross-linking procedure conducted during vision correction surgery.
Drug: Riboflavin
Riboflavin will be instilled prior to corneal cross linking.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative Best-Corrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Month 9
Month 9

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Residual Refractive error at the 1, 3 and 6 month visits
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, and 6
Months 1, 3, and 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cxlusa

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: William Trattler, MD, Center for Excellence in Eye Care
  • Study Director: Roy Rubinfeld, CXL-USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 14, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CXL-RSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings