Efficacy and Safety of an Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis

July 18, 2014 updated by: Alcon Research

Phase 3, Efficacy and Safety Study of AL-4943A Ophthalmic Solution, 0.77% in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model

The purpose of this study is to evaluate an ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) model.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Enrolled participants will be tested for the presence of common allergies using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) model. Drops of increasing concentration of a solubilized allergen will be instilled in both eyes until a positive reaction occurred. The test will be repeated to confirm the allergic reaction. Participants with confirmed reactions will be administered the test article (Day 0) and undergo a CAC 24 hours post-instillation (Day 1). On Day 14, participants will be administered the test article and undergo an additional CAC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
902

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to be dosed in both eyes, able and willing to make the required study visits and to follow instructions.
  • Negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential and use adequate birth control throughout the study period.
  • Diagnostic skin test indicative of allergy for cat hair, cat dander, grasses, ragweed, dust mite, dog dander, cockroach and/or trees within 24 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
  • History of seasonal or perennial allergic conjunctivitis for at least 1 year prior to Visit 1.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity of 55 or greater in each eye as measured by ETDRS (letters read method).
  • Manifest a positive bilateral Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) test response.
  • Willing to discontinue contact lens wear for at least 72 hours prior to Visit 1 and throughout the study.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history or presence of persistent dry eye syndrome, or currently requires frequent use of artificial tears, gels or lubricants, presence of punctal plugs, use of Restasis®, or topical ocular corticosteroids for dryness of eyes.
  • Presence of an ocular condition that may affect the study outcomes.
  • History or evidence of ocular surgery (including refractive procedures such as LASIK, PRK and RK) within 6 months of Visit 1.
  • Presence of signs/symptoms of active allergic conjunctivitis at the start of Visits 1, 2, 3A, or 4.
  • History of anaphylactic reaction to any allergens used in this study.
  • Current evidence or recent (within 6 months) history of severe, unstable, or uncontrolled medical conditions and/or other relevant systemic diseases.
  • Use of any disallowed medication without protocol-specified washout period prior to Visit 1, or during the study.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AL-4943A
AL-4943A ophthalmic solution, 1 drop per eye Day 0, followed by 1 drop per eye Day 14
Drug: AL-4943A ophthalmic solution
Active Comparator: PATADAY
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.2%, 1 drop per eye Day 0, followed by 1 drop per eye Day 14
Drug: Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.2%
Other Names:
  • PATADAY®
Active Comparator: PATANOL
Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.1%, 1 drop per eye Day 0, followed by 1 drop per eye Day 14
Drug: Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.1%
Other Names:
  • PATANOL®
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
AL-4943A ophthalmic solution vehicle, 1 drop per eye Day 0, followed by 1 drop per eye Day 14
Drug: AL-4943A ophthalmic solution vehicle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Ocular Itching at Onset of Action
Time Frame: Day 14 (3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC)
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 27 minutes after drop installation. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a 0-4 scale (0= none, 4 = incapacitating itch). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
Day 14 (3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC)
Mean Ocular Itching at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time Frame: Day 1 (3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC)
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation on Day 0. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a 0-4 scale (0= none, 4 = incapacitating itch). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
Day 1 (3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Conjunctival Redness at Onset of Action
Time Frame: Day 14 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 27 minutes after drop installation. Conjunctival redness was assessed by the investigator on a 0-4 scale (0=none, 4=extremely severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Day 14 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
Mean Conjunctival Redness at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time Frame: Day 1 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation on Day 0. Conjunctival redness was assessed by the investigator on a 0-4 scale (0=none, 4=extremely severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Day 1 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
Mean Total Redness at Onset of Action
Time Frame: Day 14 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 27 minutes after drop installation. Conjunctival redness, ciliary redness, and episcleral redness were assessed by the investigator on 0-4 scale (0=none, 4=extremely severe). Total redness is a composite variable summing conjunctival redness, ciliary redness, and episcleral redness scores (resultant score 0-12). The average of total redness over both eyes was analyzed.
Day 14 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
Mean Total Redness at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time Frame: Day 1 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation on Day 0. Conjunctival redness, ciliary redness, and episcleral redness were assessed by the investigator on 0-4 scale (0=none, 4=extremely severe). Total redness is a composite variable summing conjunctival redness, ciliary redness, and episcleral redness scores (resultant score 0-12). The average of total redness over both eyes was analyzed.
Day 1 (7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC)
Proportion of Ocular Itching Responders at Onset of Action
Time Frame: Day 14
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 27 minutes after drop installation. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a 0-4 scale (0= none, 4 = incapacitating itch). A responder was defined as a participant with zero-itch (a score of zero on ocular itching for both eyes) or with at least 2 units reduction in ocular itching relative to the baseline confirmatory CAC score. Ocular itching score was averaged across both eyes and over the 3 post-CAC assessments (3, 5, and 7 minutes) for the calculation of units reduction. Proportion of Ocular Itching Responders is reported as a percentage.
Day 14
Proportion of Itch Responders at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time Frame: Day 1
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation on Day 0. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a 0-4 scale (0= none, 4 = incapacitating itch). A responder was defined as a participant with zero-itch (a score of zero on ocular itching for both eyes) or with at least 2 units reduction in ocular itching relative to the baseline confirmatory CAC score. Ocular itching score was averaged across both eyes and over the 3 post-CAC assessments (3, 5, and 7 minutes) for the calculation of units reduction. Proportion of Ocular Itching Responders is reported as a percentage.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alcon Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Abhijit Narvekar, MS, MBBS, Alcon Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C-12-053

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings