Topiramate as an Adjunct to Amantadine in the Treatment of Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease (TOP-DYSK)

March 25, 2019 updated by: Christopher G. Goetz, MD, Rush University Medical Center
The study will involve an eighteen-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel designed comparison between add-on topiramate and add-on placebo to stable treatment with amatadine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who continue to have dyskinesia on amantadine.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We conducted a randomized placebo controlled trial of topiramate in PD dyskinetic subjects already on amantadine but with continuing dyskinesia. Topiramate or placebo was introduced in blinded fashion with a gradual titration (topiramate 25-150 mg/d) over 6 weeks and then a maintenance period of 8 weeks. The primary outcome of interest was change from baseline to end of study in total Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) score using Intention to Treat analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • University of South Florida
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • Oregon Health Sciences University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Parkinson's disease patient, defined by United Kingdom (UK) Brain Bank criteria
  2. Current age between 30-90
  3. Clinically pertinent dyskinesias defined by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-s) score (see attachment) > 3 (mild) established by clinician's total assessment of patient including objective observation during the screening process. *
  4. Stable doses of all antiparkinsonian medications for at least 4 weeks
  5. Stable treatment with at least 200 mg amantadine for at least 4 weeks.
  6. Presence of a caregiver willing to participate in the study
  7. In the opinion of the enrolling investigator, the subject will be able to maintain current dosing schedule of antiparkinsonian drugs for the duration of the trial.
  8. Subjects must be free of dementia, depression and psychosis as determined by clinical examination.
  9. The subject must be willing to participate in all study related activities and visits.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Any subjects with clinical evidence suggestive of an atypical or secondary form of Parkinson's Disease
  2. Any subject who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, has a concomitant medical illness which would preclude them from being treated with amantadine,
  3. Any subject who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, will be unable to maintain current stable dosing of their anti-parkinsonian medications for the duration of the trial,
  4. Any subject with evidence for dementia, depression, or psychosis, as determined by clinical examination.
  5. Any subject who has not signed informed consent, or unable or unwilling to participate in all of the study related activities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Topiramate
Topiramate as adjunct to amantadine.
Drug: Topiramate
Topiramate as adjunct to amantadine
Other Names:
  • Topamax
Drug: Amantadine
Existing treatment for all participants
Other Names:
  • Symmetrel
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (sugar pill)
Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Placebo control
Other Names:
  • sugar pill
Drug: Amantadine
Existing treatment for all participants
Other Names:
  • Symmetrel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to week 14 (end of study) on the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale
The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) will be the primary outcome measure for this study. This choice is based on the outcome of the Validation of Dyskinesia Rating Scales study. In this study, the UDysRS was identified as the most sensitive scale to detect change in dyskinesia in an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amatadine. The UDysRS utilizes rater information, patient self-report and objective measures of dyskinesia to provide assessments of impairment and disability due to dyskinesia. Score ranges are 0-108 with higher scores representing more severe impairment.
Change from baseline to week 14 (end of study) on the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression - Change Score
Time Frame: Assessed at Week 10 and 14 by blinded treating physician and subject
The Clinical Global Impression - Change score is an ordinal measure of change with a range of 0 (not assessed) to 7 (very much worse). A score of 4 is associated with "no change".
Assessed at Week 10 and 14 by blinded treating physician and subject
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, week 6, week 10 and week 14
This is a 4-part scale that rates both non-motor and motor (including dyskinesia) aspects of Parkinson's disease. Parts of the scales will be completed by the blinded treating physician while assessing the subject and other parts will be self-completed by the subject
Assessed at baseline, week 6, week 10 and week 14
Hoehn & Yahr Staging
Time Frame: Assessment completed at baseline, week 6, week 10 and week 14
Hoehn & Yahr staging of Parkinson's disease is completed by the blinded treating physician assessing the subject
Assessment completed at baseline, week 6, week 10 and week 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rush University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher G Goetz, MD, Rush University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TOP-DYSK

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings