Bioequivalence of Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride Study
Clinical Evaluation of TRUE Test Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride Allergen: Bioequivalence of Vehicle Formulations
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Dermatology Specialists PSC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Current or previous symptoms and/or history consistent with allergic contact dermatitis, and positive patch test (within the past 10 years) to ethylenediamine dihydrochloride
- 18 years of age or older, otherwise in good health
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must consent to a urine pregnancy test; results must be negative for study inclusion.
- Informed consent signed and understood by each subject.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects unable to meet inclusion requirements
- Women who are breastfeeding or pregnant
- Topical treatment during the last 7 days with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents on or near the test area
- Systemic treatment during the last 7 days with corticosteroids (equivalent to > 10 mg prednisone) or other immunosuppressive agents
- Treatment with ultraviolet (UV) light (including tanning) during the previous 3 weeks
- Acute dermatitis outbreak or dermatitis on or near the test area on the back
- Subjects unable to comply with patch test study requirements including multiple return visits and activity restrictions (e.g., protecting test panels from excess moisture due to showering or vigorous activity)
- Subject participation in clinical trials of investigational drugs, treatments, or devices, other than T.R.U.E. TEST, during this study or 3 weeks prior to inclusion in this study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride
Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in methylcellulose 50 mcg/cm2 Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in polyvinylpyrrolidone 50 mcg/cm2 Methylcellulose (negative control 1) Polyvinylpyrrolidone (negative control 2)
|
1 allergen panel containing 2 allergen and 2 control patches
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Reactions to Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in MC (Methylcellulose) and Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Bioequivalence will be calculated using concordance (Cohen's Kappa) between the number of subjects with positive reactions (defined as a score of 1+, 2+ or 3+) to 50 mcg/cm2 Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in MC (methylcellulose) and 50 mcg/cm2 Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in PVP (polyvinylpyrrolidone) and the number of subjects with negative reactions to 50 mcg/cm2 Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in MC (methylcellulose) and 50 mcg/cm2 Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in PVP (polyvinylpyrrolidone)
|
21 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Late Reactions to Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in MC (Methylcellulose) and Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)
Time Frame: Day 7-21
|
Number of subjects with a late reaction, defined as a positive reaction (score of 1+, 2+, 3+) initially appearing at 7-21 days after patch application)
|
Day 7-21
|
|
Number of Participants With Persistent Reactions to Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in MC (Methylcellulose) and Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)
Time Frame: Day 3-21
|
Number of subjects with a persistent reaction, defined as a positive reaction (score of 1+, 2+, 3+) initially appearing at one visit and persisting through the following visit.
|
Day 3-21
|
|
Number of Participants With Tape Irritation to Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in MC (Methylcellulose) and Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)
Time Frame: Day 2 (48 hours after application)
|
Skin irritation associated with the adhesive tape (tape irritation) used to secure the test patches was evaluated at Visit 2 (day 2) 20 minutes following panel removal according to the following Tape Adhesion Score Scale: None (no irritation), Weak (faint to definite pink erythema), Moderate (moderate erythema, definite redness), Strong (severe erythema, very intense redness).
Entire panel was scored as a whole- individual allergen sites were not scored separately.
|
Day 2 (48 hours after application)
|
|
Number of Participants With Itching to Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in MC (Methylcellulose) and Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)
Time Frame: Day 2 (48 hours after patch application)
|
Subject self-report of itching attributed to the test panels was recorded at Visit 2 (day 2), 20 minutes following panel removal.
The following Itching Score Scale was used: None (no itching), Weak (minimal discomfort), Moderate (definite discomfort), Strong (significantly bothersome, possible interference with sleep or daily activity).
Entire panel was scored as a whole- individual allergen sites were not scored separately.
|
Day 2 (48 hours after patch application)
|
|
Number of Participants With Burning to Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in MC (Methylcellulose) and Ethylenediamine Dihydrochloride in PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone)
Time Frame: Day 2 (48 hours after application)
|
Subject self-report of burning attributed to the test panels was recorded at Visit 2 (day 2), 20 minutes following panel removal.
The following Burning Score scale was used: None (no burning), Weak (minimal discomfort), Moderate (definite discomfort), Strong (significantly bothersome, possible interference with sleep or daily activity).
Entire panel was scored as a whole- individual allergen sites were not scored separately.
|
Day 2 (48 hours after application)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joseph Fowler, MD, Dermatology Specialists
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SPD 12 P1 401
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.