Eradication of Residual Disease by Preemptive Immunointervention After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (RICAC)

May 8, 2013 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation for CLL With Preemptive MDR Management (ICLL 03 RICAC-PMM)

Usually Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly patients. However, the diagnosis in young patients become more frequently with poor prognosis. The identification of new prognostic factors permits early determination of the high risk population and provide them the therapeutic intensification. Allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (AHSCT) allows to long-term remission and in some cases complete and definitive eradication of the disease. After chemotherapy or antibodies, the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity is associated with better disease-free survival. MRD negativity occurs in some patients with the appearance of GVHD, stopping the immunosuppression or after donor lymphocyte injection (DLI). The negativity of MRD in the first year post-transplant is correlated with better progression-free survival or overall survival (Dreger 2010, Farina 2009, Caballero 2005, Algrin, 2011). So, MRD negativity may be an objective after AHSCT. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate a standardized preemptive immunointervention of post-allograft immunosuppressive therapy modulation and DLI administration according to MRD level. The objective is to obtain MRD negativity at 12 months after AHSCT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients will receive AHSCT with Fludarabine-Busulfan based conditioning :

  • Fludarabine : 30 mg/m2/day - from Day-6 to Day-2
  • Busulfan IV : 3.2 mg/kg/day - on Day-5 and Day-4
  • ATG (Anti-thymocyte Globulin) : 2.5 mg/kg/day on Day-2 and Day-1

Preemptive immunointervention post AHSCT consists in reduce immunosuppressive treatment more or less associated with DLI according to :

  • the presence or absence of severe Graft versus host disease (GVHD) (acute grade 2 and / or chronic)
  • the presence or absence of a response on criteria of response IWCLL
  • Getting or not a blood MRD negative (<-10 ^ -4) evaluated by flow cytometry

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Recruiting
        • CHU clermont-ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with CLL (Matutes score 4 or 5) stages A, B, C with evolution criteria according IWCLL 2008 or lymphocytic lymphoma with severity criteria (EBMT criteria) which indicated allograft (deletion 17p) and requiring treatment
  • Age: 18-70 years

  • At least one of the following criteria of poor prognosis (EBMT recommendations - Dreger 2007)

    1. No response or relapse within 12 months of treatment with purine analogues (including "fludarabine refractory" i.e patients in response <PR and / or relapse within 6 months after at least 2 courses of Fludurabine)
    2. relapse within 24 months after combination therapy including purine analogs or autograft, with indication of new start of treatment
    3. Mutation/deletion 17p13 (p53) with indication for treatment
  • Partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) at the last treatment (IWCLL 2008)
  • Residual mass <5 cm (clinical and CT scan)
  • Identical intrafamilial donor HLA (or with a mismatch) or in the absence of family donor, an unrelated donor 10/10 for HLA A, B, C, DR, DQ and is committed to giving DLI (see consent form donor)
  • Sorror score comorbidity: ≤ 2
  • Written informed consent
  • Member or beneficiary of a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Richter Syndrome
  • Usual contraindications for realisation of allogeneic transplantation including
  • Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
  • Pregnancy or lactating women
  • Cardiac contraindication : Cardiac ejection fraction <50%
  • Pulmonary contraindication : DLCO <50%
  • Renal contraindication : Creatininine clearance <30 ml / min
  • Hepatic contraindication : AST and / or ALT and / or total bilirubine> 2 N except Gilbert disease or localisation specific LLC
  • HIV positivity
  • Cancer evolution or de novo occurred in the previous 5 years except basal cell cancer skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix of uterus
  • Affection psychiatric disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fludarabin
Drug: Fludarabin (post-allograft immunosuppressive therapy modulation and DLI Mononuclear cells from allogenic blood)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
MRD(Minimal Residual Disease) negativity level
Time Frame: 12 months after AHSCT(Allogenic Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation)
12 months after AHSCT(Allogenic Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of relapses progression
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Incidence of toxic deaths
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Incidence of GVHD (acute and chronic)
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Survival (progression free survival, overall survival, survival without treatment)
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Post-transplant chimerism (total blood and lymphoid T lymphocyte populations)
Time Frame: baseline; 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
baseline; 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months
Incidence of infectious complications and severity
Time Frame: at 12 months
The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate a standardized preemptive immunointervention of post-allograft immunosuppressive therapy modulation and DLI administration according to MRD level. The objective is to obtain MRD negativity at 12 months after AHSCT
at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pierre Fabre Laboratories

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Olivier Tournilhac, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHU-0150
  • 2011-A00906-35

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings