Entecavir for Biological Agents Associated HBV Reactivation in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients

March 11, 2019 updated by: vghtpe user, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Propylactic Use of Entecavir for Biological Agents Associated Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Antiviral prophylaxis can prevent the risk of biologic agents-associated HBV reactivation in hepatitis B inactive carriers and patients with past HBV infection

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The risk of HBV reactivation is associated with the intensity of immunosuppression. Biological therapies block the action of biological products involved in immune-inflammatory pathogenesis of many diseases. However, these biologic agents induce a profound immunosuppression, and their use has been reported to be associated with HBV reactivation. Currently, the actual incidence of HBV reactivation in inflammatory arthritis patients who underwent biologic treatments (TNF-α blockades) is unclear, especially in inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients with past hepatitis B infection. In this study, we plan to enroll IA patients who are inactive HBV carriers (HBsAg-positive/ HBV viral loads <2000 IU/ml; subgroup 1), or have past HBV infection (HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive/ HBV viral loads < 2000 IU/ml; subgroup 2); and first line biologic treatment (Humira or Enbrel or Simponi or Orencia or Mabthera or Actemra) is indicated. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic entecavir treatment for each subgroup. In the prophylactic group, participants will initiate entecavir 0.5 mg/day orally one week before biologic treatment. Entecavir treatment will be continued normally for 12 months. In the therapeutic group, patients will start entecavir therapy, 0.5 mg/day orally, when reactivation of HBV (pre-emptive treatment). HBV reactivation is defined as HBV viral loads > 2,000 IU/ml for 2 consecutive visits of one month apart. The main goal of the study is to delineate the incidence of HBV reactivation during and after biologic treatment in IA patients who are inactive HBV carriers or have past HBV infection, and tries to define the optimal HBV monitoring and antiviral prophylactic strategy in IA patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
115

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Division of Gastroenterology & Division of Allergy Immunology and Rheumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age : from 20 to 90 y/o.
  2. HBsAg-positive for more than 6 months and HBV DNA < 2000 IU/ml (Subgroup 1）or HBsAg-negative but anti-HBc positive with HBV DNA < 2000 IU/ml (Subgroup 2）.
  3. Inflammatory arthritis patients who plan to treat with biological agents, including Humira or Enbrel or Simponi or Orencia or Mabthera or Actemra; as first line biologic treatment is indicated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. HCV, HIV, or HDV coinfection.
  2. Uncontrolled HCC or other malignancy within 3 years.
  3. Decompensated liver cirrhosis (CTP score ≥ 7).
  4. Uremia patients under hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis or patients with Ccr < 50 mL/min
  5. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  6. Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Entecavir, Prophylactic group
Participants will initiate entecavir 0.5 mg/day orally one week before biologic treatment. Entecavir treatment will be continued normally for 12 months (6 months after stopping biologic therapy or till restart another course of biologic treatment if the clinicians' judgment is minimal risk of reactivation after the first course of biologic agent treatment).
Drug: Entecavir
In the prophylactic group, participants will initiate entecavir 0.5 mg/day orally one week before biologic treatment. Entecavir treatment (adjust dosage according to renal function) will be continued normally for 12 months (6 months after stopping biologic therapy or till restart another course of biologic treatment if the clinicians' judgment is minimal risk of reactivation after the first course of biologic agent treatment).
Other Names:
  • Baraclude
No Intervention: Control group (pre-emptive treatment)
Patients will start entecavir therapy, 0.5 mg/day orally, when reactivation of HBV (defined as detectable HBV viral loads for 2 consecutive visits with at least one month apart), and continued entecavir treatment until undetectable HBV viral loads for 1 year (consistent with current APASL recommendation).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV reactivation
Time Frame: 12 months after biologic treatment
The main goal of the study is to delineate the incidence of HBV reactivation during and after biologic treatment in IA patients who are inactive HBV carriers or have past HBV infection, and tries to define the optimal HBV monitoring and antiviral prophylactic strategy in IA patients.
12 months after biologic treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
HBsAg reverse seroconversion in occult HB patients.
Time Frame: 12 months after biologic treatment
12 months after biologic treatment
Hepatitis flare (ALT > 100 U/L) related to biological treatments
Time Frame: 12 months after biologic treatment
12 months after biologic treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yi-Hsiang Huang, MD, Ph.D., Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 10, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AI463-962

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings