Use of Teach Back to Improve Comprehension of Discharge Instructions for Emergency Patients With Limited Health Literacy
The Impact of Teach-back on Comprehension of Discharge Instructions Among Emergency Patients With Limited Health Literacy: A Randomized, Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital Emergency Department
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients being discharged from the emergency department
- A score of 6 or less on the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, Revised (consistent with Limited Health Literacy)
Exclusion Criteria:
- aphasia,
- non-English speaking,
- mental handicap,
- psychiatric chief complaint,
- too high acuity per physician,
- insurmountable communication barrier,
- evaluations for sexual assault,
- clinical intoxication.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Teach-back
Patients are prompted to state back in their own words their comprehension of the information given to them at discharge.
|
Patients are asked to repeat back in their own words their understanding of the discharge information that was provided to them.
|
|
No Intervention: Standard Discharge Instructions
Patient receives usual discharge instructions as administered by the nurse assigned to the patient.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Objective comprehension
Time Frame: Questions evaluating comprehension were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).
|
Concordance between audio taped comprehension compared to review of medical record using 5 level scale of concordance
|
Questions evaluating comprehension were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
self-reported comprehension
Time Frame: Questions evaluating self-reported comprehension were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).
|
self reported comprehension of discharge instructions for the following areas: emergency department (ED) course (Tests and treatment); Post-ED care (medication instructions; home instructions; follow-up instructions); Return instructions.
|
Questions evaluating self-reported comprehension were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Questions evaluating satisfaction were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).
|
Patient satisfaction as measured by 4 questions modified from the Consumer Assessment of Health Providers & Systems (CAHPS) Clinician & Group Surveys
|
Questions evaluating satisfaction were administered during the discharge interview immediately following discharge from the ED at the index visit (Day 1).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard T Griffey, MD, MPH, Washington University School of Medicine
- Principal Investigator: Kim A Kaphingst, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201206011
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.