Novel Model for South Asian Treatment in Diabetes (NaMaSTe-Diabetes) Trial in Primary Care (Namaste)

November 24, 2020 updated by: Khan, University of British Columbia
South Asians (SA) living in Canada and globally have high rates of type 2 diabetes (diabetes). Despite the burden of diabetes in this population, diabetes management remains poor. SA patients are less likely to exercise, follow a healthy diet (4), participate in exercise programs (5), and are 24% less likely to achieve glucose, blood pressure and lipid targets for diabetes than the general population (6). 55-60% of SA patients were non-adherent to their diabetes life-saving medications, compared to 30-35% non-adherence in the general population (7). This large gap in diabetes care is not surprising given language and communication barriers between primary care providers and SA patients (8-10), lack of knowledge about diabetes (8-11), preference for alternative therapies (12-14) and fundamentally different cultural beliefs on diabetes and diabetes management (15-18). Although there is some preliminary evidence that culturally tailored, chronic disease models may improve outcomes (21-24), the current evidence base is insufficient to justify the system modifications required to provide culturally tailored care across primary care settings in Canada. We propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a novel culturally tailored lifestyle and medication adherence intervention in SA patients with poorly controlled diabetes. The study is called the Novel Model for South Asian diabetes Treatment (NaMaSTe-Diabetes) trial in primary care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

South Asians living in Canada and globally have high rates of chronic diseases including hypertension, type 2 diabetes (diabetes) and cardiac disease (1-3). Diabetes is arguably one of the most pressing chronic diseases among South Asian (SA) populations as it occurs at 50% higher rates in SA patients than the general population, develops 5-10 years earlier, and is one of the principal causes of premature heart attack and death in this group (1). Despite the burden of diabetes in this population, diabetes management remains poor. Under the current health care system, SA patients are less likely to exercise, follow a healthy diet (4), participate in exercise programs (5), and are 24% less likely to achieve glucose, blood pressure and lipid targets for diabetes than the general population (6). 55-60% of SA patients were non-adherent to their diabetes life-saving medications, compared to 30-35% non-adherence in the general population (7). This large gap in diabetes care is not surprising given language and communication barriers between primary care providers and SA patients (8-10), lack of knowledge about diabetes (8-11), preference for alternative therapies (12-14) and fundamentally different cultural beliefs on diabetes and diabetes management (15-18). Although there is some preliminary evidence that culturally tailored, chronic disease models may improve outcomes (21-24), the current evidence base is insufficient to justify the system modifications required to provide culturally tailored care across primary care settings in Canada. We propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a novel culturally tailored lifestyle and medication adherence intervention in SA patients with poorly controlled diabetes. The study is called the Novel Model for South Asian diabetes Treatment (NaMaSTe-Diabetes) trial in primary care. The study aims to recruit 600 patients with type 2 diabetes and randomize them to either a culturally tailored lifestyle and medication adherence intervention (family based, culturally tailored diabetes self management education with ongoing peer support) versus usual care on glycemic control (change in A1C level) and change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) from baseline to 6 months in SA patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. The NaMaSTe trial is a multi-center individual randomized controlled trial of 600 SA patients with poorly controlled diabetes (A1C ≥7%) living in British Columbia, Canada.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • Recruiting
        • University of British Columbia
        • Contact:
          • Gurpreet Oshan, BA
          • Phone Number: 778 387 3100
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nadia Khan, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tricia Tang, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age >19 years of age
  • type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring at least one medication (oral hypoglycemic agent and/or insulin) to control diabetes
  • A1C ≥7% in past 1 year
  • willingness/ability to attend the Diabetes education, dietician, and peer sessions and follow up assessments
  • ability to provide informed consent
  • self identify as South Asian (from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, or Bangladesh) regardless of generational status or timing of immigration with ability to speak in English or Punjabi.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • life- limiting illness <12 months
  • physical inability to exercise
  • recurrent severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycaemic unawareness
  • family member of, or living in same household as a participant
  • pregnancy or gestational diabetes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Culturally tailored diabetes program

Culturally tailored diabetes program

  • culturally tailored diabetes education
  • lifestyle counselling
  • medication adherence counseling
  • peer supporter
  • communication training
  • family member involvement
Behavioral: Culturally tailored diabetes program
Includes family member and peer support Includes communication training
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual Care includes continuing to visit primary care physician for ongoing diabetes management Printed diabetes education materials.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in A1C or blood pressure (systolic or diastolic blood pressure)
Time Frame: within 6 months from baseline; 0, 3, and 6 months
within 6 months from baseline; 0, 3, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in fasting lipid profile
Time Frame: 6 months; 0 and 6 months
6 months; 0 and 6 months
Change in weight or waist circumference
Time Frame: 6 months; 0, 3, and 6 months
6 months; 0, 3, and 6 months
change in health status
Time Frame: 6 months; 0, 3, and 6 months
6 months; 0, 3, and 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure related outcomes
Time Frame: 6 months; 0, 3, and 6 months
health behaviours, medication adherence, patient engagement/activation, diabetes management, diabetes distress, depression, social support, knowledge, motivation, self efficacy.
6 months; 0, 3, and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of British Columbia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nadia A Khan, MD MSc, University of British Columbia
  • Principal Investigator: Tricia Tang, PhD, University pf British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H14-00693

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings