A Prospective Blinded Randomized Study Comparing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass and Their Effect on Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Using 24 Horus pH Monitoring (GERD)

April 25, 2017 updated by: Mehran Anvari, McMaster University
Obesity has become a significant health problem in Canada. It is known to be a risk factor for many diseases, including Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). When medical efforts to lose weight fail, patients often consider bariatric surgical procedures as the next step. The two most common bariatric procedures performed are Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). The gold standard for diagnosing GERD is Esophageal pH monitoring, as it is the most objective method to document the reflux, assess the severity and monitor the response to treatment of the disease. In the last few years LSG has gained in popularity due to its simplicity and short operative time. Currently the comparison between bariatric surgery and GERD symptoms is very one sided. There are significant numbers of studies with conclusive results that state that LRYGB has a positive effect on GERD symptoms, however there is little evidence that states the same about LSG. This means that the relationship between LSG and GERD is inconclusive. An objective evaluation of GERD using 24 hour pH monitoring and validated CRFs at different follow up time points will contribute greatly to our understanding of what this relationship might be.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilled criteria for bariatric surgery as coined by National Institutes of Health conference.
  • Their age is ≥18 years and ≤70 years
  • The group with symptoms of GERD needs to have diagnosis of GERD in their medical record and taking proton pump inhibitors on a daily basis.
  • Able and willing to give written consent
  • The patient is willing to perform the pre-operative tests required for this study.
  • The patient fits for both surgeries - LSG or LRYGB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous bariatric surgery
  • Previous anti reflux procedure
  • Contra-indication to general anesthesia
  • Any medical condition, which in the judgment of the Investigator and/or designee makes the subject a poor candidate for the investigational procedure
  • Pregnant or lactating female (Women of child bearing potential must take a pregnancy test prior to surgery)
  • Hiatal hernia above 4cm (measured in the pre-operative gastroscopy).
  • Multiple surgeries in abdominal cavity or previous small bowel disease/resection
  • Patient on CPAP treatment for his OSA disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: GERD Symptoms
Other: 24 pH monitoring
The study is performed with the patient fasting for a minimum of 6 hours. A single channel or dual channel (15 cm spacing) pH probe is inserted trans nasally. The pH sensor, or distal pH sensor in the case of 2 channel testing, is positioned 5 cm above the proximal margin of the LES, as determined by esophageal manometric testing. pH-Z ambulatory monitor (Given Imaging Digitrapper) is used for data acquisition and the data analyzed with pH Analysis Program (Given Imaging AccuView). The number of reflux events, defined as a drop in esophageal pH readings below 4.0, is recorded and the percentage of time with esophageal acid exposure is analyzed using defined protocols and accepted normal values.
Other: Esophageal Manometry:
A high resolution esophageal manometry catheter is used for testing and inserted Trans nasally. The patient is given 10 liquid swallows (5mL of water), at intervals of approximately 30 seconds. The catheter (Sierra Scientific/Given Imaging) has 36 sensors, each one averaging pressures from 12 circumferential positions. This gives a total of 432 data points. The sensors are placed 1 cm apart, spanning a length of 35 cm. The catheter simultaneously records pressure readings from the esophagus, sphincter regions (UES and LES), pharynx and stomach without the need for a station pull-through technique. Results are reported according to defined protocols and accepted normal values.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: No GERD Symptoms
Other: 24 pH monitoring
The study is performed with the patient fasting for a minimum of 6 hours. A single channel or dual channel (15 cm spacing) pH probe is inserted trans nasally. The pH sensor, or distal pH sensor in the case of 2 channel testing, is positioned 5 cm above the proximal margin of the LES, as determined by esophageal manometric testing. pH-Z ambulatory monitor (Given Imaging Digitrapper) is used for data acquisition and the data analyzed with pH Analysis Program (Given Imaging AccuView). The number of reflux events, defined as a drop in esophageal pH readings below 4.0, is recorded and the percentage of time with esophageal acid exposure is analyzed using defined protocols and accepted normal values.
Other: Esophageal Manometry:
A high resolution esophageal manometry catheter is used for testing and inserted Trans nasally. The patient is given 10 liquid swallows (5mL of water), at intervals of approximately 30 seconds. The catheter (Sierra Scientific/Given Imaging) has 36 sensors, each one averaging pressures from 12 circumferential positions. This gives a total of 432 data points. The sensors are placed 1 cm apart, spanning a length of 35 cm. The catheter simultaneously records pressure readings from the esophagus, sphincter regions (UES and LES), pharynx and stomach without the need for a station pull-through technique. Results are reported according to defined protocols and accepted normal values.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observe acid exposure to the distal esophagus
Time Frame: 1 year
This will be measured using the esophageal 24 hours monitoring before surgery and at the 6 month follow up. The patients will be randomized to two different types of surgery and the results compared.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare GERD symptoms in patients.
Time Frame: 1 year
This will be measured using esophageal manometry prior to surgery and at the six month follow up visit. We are looking for time in minutes with a pH of below 4 and a Demeeser score of below 14.7
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 14-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings