Glycemic Impact of Myo-inositol in Pregnancy

May 17, 2016 updated by: Amy Valent, Oregon Health and Science University

Glycemic Impact of Myo-inositol in High Risk and Gestational Diabetic Pregnancies: a Pilot Study

Myo-inositol has been shown to decrease the rate of diabetes in pregnancy in European studies. It is not known exactly how this occurs or what it does to the sugar when the supplement is taken. This study purpose is to look at the patient's sugar levels while taking the supplement to see if the overall levels of sugar go down. We hypothesize that in addition to sugar levels, other hormones influencing diabetes will be altered.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Myo-inositol is important for glucose homeostasis and has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity. This is a prospective cohort pilot study to determine daily glycemic pharmacokinetics and metabolic influences of myo-inositol supplementation using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and pre- and post-supplement blood work in high risk pregnancies and women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitis (GDM). Risk factors include: obesity, previous pregnancy with GDM, family history of diabetes, glucose intolerance, and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Women will have a CGMS device placed on day one and begin with 3 days of placebo plus folic acid (400mcg) to determine baseline glycemia and metabolic levels. For the final 4 days, women with take myo-inositol supplementation (4g) plus folic acid (400mcg). The CGMS device will be removed on day 7 when final blood work will be obtained. Self-capillary glucose testing 4 times per day is recorded to calibrate CGMS glucose values. These observations will help determine the effects of myo-inositol on overall mean glucose and other metabolic factors in high risk and GDM patients, identify pharmacokinetic discipline in pregnancy, and develop the groundwork for future prospective clinical trials for the prevention and/or augmentation in treatment GDM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health and Science University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amy M Valent, DO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking
  • singleton
  • pregnant females between 20-28 weeks of gestation at time of enrollment PLUS (either of the following)
  • High risk including women must have passed routine glucose screening and have greater than or equal to 1 of the following high risk criteria: first degree family member with diabetes mellitus, previous pregnancy with gestational diabetes, PCOS, or body mass index great than or equal to 30.
  • Gestational diabetes diagnosed in current pregnancy based on IADPSG or NIH consensus diagnostic recommendation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pre-pregnancy diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • renal disease
  • immunocompromised
  • currently taking immunosuppressive medications
  • age <13 years old
  • non-English speaking
  • multifetal gestation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Myo-inositol, folic acid
  1. myo-inositol, oral, 2g, two times per day for 5 total days
  2. folic acid, oral 200 micrograms, two times per day for 7 days
  3. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Surveillance device for 7 days during study period
  4. Capillary glucose monitoring 4 times per day
Dietary supplement: myo-inositol
myo-inositol, oral, 2g, twice a day for 5 days total
Other Names:
  • Inositol
Device: Continuous glucose monitoring surveillance
monitoring device will be placed by experienced research members to the patient on Day 1 and she will continue to wear until Day 7. This device monitors overall glycemia every 5 minutes and records the information, which can be downloaded after discontinued.
Other Names:
  • Medtronic CGMS
Device: Glucose monitoring
patients will use the glucose meter, test strips, and lancets to determine her capillary glucose levels 4 times per day (fasting, and 1 hour post-prandial levels)
Other Names:
  • OneTouch glucose meter
  • test strips
  • lancets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall mean glucose
Time Frame: 7 days
Difference in overall mean glucose with folic acid alone versus myo-inositol+folic acid supplementation; measured by continuous glucose monitoring system started pre-supplementation and continued for 4 days after supplementation.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
metabolic differences
Time Frame: 1,4,7 days
Metabolic differences (myo-inositol, chiro-inositol, fasting insulin, c-peptide, and adiponectin) pre and post supplementation.
1,4,7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
side effects
Time Frame: day 1,4,7,10
Through patient surveys, will determine side effect profiles of the supplement
day 1,4,7,10
steady state
Time Frame: day 1, 4, 7
Determine time (days) of supplement required to reach steady state by measuring pre, 1 day post, and at day 4 after supplementation.
day 1, 4, 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oregon Health and Science University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Washington University School of Medicine
Duke University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Amy M Valent, DO, Test Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014-1676

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings