Phase IV Study With a 36-week Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin Therapy When Added to the Therapy of Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin.

March 29, 2016 updated by: AstraZeneca

A 16-week Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase IV Study With a 36-week Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin Therapy When Added to the Therapy of Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin

Japanese male and female patients with Type 2 Diabetes and aged ≥ 20 years old, with inadequate glycemic control on insulin defined as Haemoglobin A1c ≥ 7.2% and < 11% will be enrolled into the wash-out phase or directly into the lead-in phase depending on whether the patient has been receiving an Oral antidiabetic drug (including Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 agonists and excluding Thiazolidinedions) other than a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor as part of the baseline treatment. Additional treatment with a concomitant Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor is allowed. And around 180 eligible patients in total will be randomized into the study with a 2:1 randomization scheme (i.e.120 patients into the dapagliflozin treatment group and 60 patients into the placebo treatment group. All subjects who completed a 16 weeks double-blind treatment period will shift to a 36 weeks open extension treatment period.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
266

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Adachi-ku, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Chitose-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Chiyoda-ku, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Chuo-ku, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Fukuoka-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Hirosaki-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Kamakura-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Koriyama-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Mitaka-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Oita-Shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Osaka-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Sendai-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Shizuoka-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Yokohama-shi, Japan
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes according the criteria specified by the Japan Diabetes Society
  • Japanese Men or women age ≥ 20 years at time of consenting.
  • Stable (unless adjustment is required based on Fasting Plasma Glucose values) dose insulin* mono-therapy with the mean insulin [up to two types of insulin within authorized indication in Japan] dose of ≥ 0.2 IU/kg/day AND ≥ 15 IU/body/day over the past 8 weeks prior to enrolment.
  • HbA1c ≥ 7.2% and < 11% from the blood samples collected at Visit 1 (enrolment) and Visit 3, observed from the central laboratory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes mellitus, known diagnosis of Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young, secondary diabetes mellitus or diabetes insipidus
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis.
  • Thyroid-stimulating hormone and free T4 values outside normal range, observed from the central laboratory; an abnormal Thyroid-stimulating hormone value needs to be followed up with a free T4 test. Patients with abnormal free T4 values will be excluded at Visit 1
  • Fasting Plasma Glucose >240 mg/dL (twice in a row) despite the permitted dose adjustment of insulin therapy during washout period and lead-in period.
  • Recent cardiovascular events in a patient.
  • eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Visit 3, observed from the central laboratory.
  • History of unstable or rapidly progressing renal disease.
  • History of unexplained microscopic or gross hematuria, or microscopic hematuria at Visit 1, confirmed by a follow-up sample at next scheduled visit, where according to the investigator a satisfactory evaluation of hematuria has not been conducted.
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency and/or significant abnormal liver function defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3x upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3x ULN, observed from the central laboratory at Visit 1.
  • Total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dL (34.2 μmol/L), observed from the central laboratory at Visit 1.
  • Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease including Hepatitis A viral antibody IgM, Hepatitis B surface antigen and Hepatitis C virus antibody, observed from the central laboratory.
  • Haemoglobin <10 g/dL (<100 g/L) or 6.2 mmol/L for men; haemoglobin <9.0 g/dL (<90 g/L) or 5.9 mmol/L for women, observed from the central laboratory at Visit 1.
  • History of chronic haemolytic anaemia or haemoglobinopathies (for example, sickle cell anaemia, thalassemia, sideroblastic anaemia). Mild haemolysis due to artificial heart valves or due to sickle cell trait is not an exclusion criterion except when haemoglobin levels are too low (as defined in haemoglobin criteria above).
  • History of malignancy within the last 5 years prior to enrolment, excluding successful treatment of basal or squamous cell skin cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: dapagliflozin 5mg
dapagliflozin tablet 5mg
Drug: Dapagliflozin 5 mg
Dapagliflozin, a blood glucose lowering drug. Oral dose
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
dapagliflozin tablet 5mg placebo
Drug: Placebo tablet
Placebo tablet. Oral dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adjusted Mean Change in HbA1c Levels
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Mean change in HbA1c levels from baseline to Week 16 between dapagliflozin 5 mg versus placebo
Baseline to Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fasting Plasma Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Mean change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to Week 16 between dapagliflozin 5 mg versus placebo
Baseline to Week 16
Total Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Mean change in total body weight from baseline to Week 16 between dapagliflozin 5 mg versus placebo
Baseline to Week 16
Total Mean Daily Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Mean change in calculated mean daily insulin dose from baseline to Week 16 between dapagliflozin 5 mg versus placebo
Baseline to Week 16
Proportion of Participants With Mean Daily Insulin Dose Reduction of Greater Than or Equal 10%
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Proportion of participants with mean daily insulin dose reduction greater than or equal 10% from baseline to week 16 (LOCF) between dapagliflozin 5 mg versus placebo
Baseline to Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D1692C00013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings