Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation Among Medicaid Enrollees
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Vermont
-
Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
- University of Vermont
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A recent myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, heart valve replacement or repair, or stable heart failure.
- Enrolled in a state-supported insurance plan for low income individuals
- Lives in and plans to remain in the greater Burlington, Vermont area (Chittenden County) for the next 12 mos.
Exclusion criteria:
- Dementia (MMSE<20) or current untreated Axis 1 psychiatric disorder other than nicotine dependence as determined by medical history
- Non-English speaking
- Prior participation in cardiac rehabilitation
- Advanced cancer, advanced frailty, or other longevity-limiting systemic disease that would preclude CR participation
- Rest angina or very low threshold angina (<2 METS) until adequate therapy is instituted
- Severe life threatening ventricular arrhythmias unless adequately controlled (e.g. intracardiac defibrillator)
- Class 4 chronic heart failure (symptoms at rest)
- Exercise-limiting non-cardiac disease such as severe arthritis, past stroke, severe lung disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Financial incentives
Participants receive financial incentives for completing exercise sessions.
|
Patients in the experimental group will receive financial incentives for completing exercise sessions.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Participants receive an equal amount of clinical contact but no financial incentives for completing exercise visits.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Attendance at Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Sessions
Time Frame: Within 4 months of initial stress test
|
The number of patients who completed cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as defined as greater than or equal to 30 sessions.
Must have been completed within 4 months of the entry stress test.
|
Within 4 months of initial stress test
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physical Health
Time Frame: Intake, 4 months
|
Secondary outcomes included changes between baseline and 4-month assessment in fitness (peak oxygen uptake directly measured by expired gas analysis or estimated by metabolic equivalents), body composition (body mass index, waist circumference), and quality of life (MacNew).The MacNew was designed to evaluate how daily activities and physical,emotional and social functioning are affected by heart disease and its treatment.
It consists of 27 questions grouped into 3 domains: physical, mental and social functioning.
Both subscales and summary score are interpreted as scores between 1 and 7; higher scores are better, and a change of at least 0.5 is a useful indicator of the minimal important difference.Changes over time were assessed using paired differences in scores from intake to four months.
Due to non-normal distributions, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used.
Contributions of other variables to changes in secondary outcomes were examined using analyses of covariance.
|
Intake, 4 months
|
|
Changes in Mental Health/Cognition
Time Frame: Changes in socio-cognitive measures will be measures from intake to completion of intervention (4 months)
|
The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEABA) is an integrated system of multi-informant assessments, including self-reports, to measure adaptive functioning and problems.
The problem items have been factor-analytically reduced to 8 syndrome scales that are consistent across age, informant and culture.
Higher scores represent higher symptoms (e.g.
emotional/behavioral problems).
The Stop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) task measures the ability to inhibit incorrect responses.
Lower scores represent a better ability to inhibit reactions.
The BRIEF-A is a rating scale developed to look at everyday behaviors associated with specific domains of executive functions in adults ages 18-90.T-scores (standardized scores) are used to interpret the individual's level of executive functioning (EF).
Higher scores represent more self-reported problems.
A score of 50 represents the mean.A difference of 10 from the mean indicates a difference of one standard deviation (SD).
|
Changes in socio-cognitive measures will be measures from intake to completion of intervention (4 months)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maintenance of Physical Health Gains Following Intervention.
Time Frame: 4 months and 1 year.
|
Changes in measures of physical health and fitness (peak oxygen uptake, metabolic equivalents, waist circumference, BMI, treadmill time, smoking status, perceived quality of life) will be measured from completion of intervention (4 months) to 8 months later (1 year follow-up).
|
4 months and 1 year.
|
|
Maintenance of Mental Health/Cognition Scores Following Intervention.
Time Frame: 4 months and 1 year.
|
Changes in measures of mental health (Beck Depression Inventory, Adult Self-Report) as well as changes in measures of executive function (Trail Making and Tower tasks, Delay Discounting, Time Perspective Questionnaire, Stop Signal Task, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function) will be measured from completion of intervention (4 months) to 8 months later (1 year follow-up).
|
4 months and 1 year.
|
|
Health Care Costs
Time Frame: From intake to one year follow-up
|
Health care costs (cost of delivering care at the cardiac rehabilitation clinic as well as hospital costs) will be calculated from study entry to one year follow-up.
|
From intake to one year follow-up
|
|
Costs of Attending Care
Time Frame: Intake to 1 year follow-up
|
Costs to the patient of attending care (transportation, child/elder care, missed wages) will be calculated from study entry to one year follow-up.
|
Intake to 1 year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRINCN9874
- P20GM103644 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.