A Study of Golimumab in Participants With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

October 15, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Golimumab, an Anti-TNFα Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Intravenously, in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intravenously (administration of a fluid into the vein) administered golimumab 2 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) in participants with active ankylosing spondylitis (chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that involves the sacroiliac joints, and often the axial skeleton, entheses, and peripheral joints).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the researchers nor the participants know what treatment the participant is receiving), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study of golimumab compared with placebo in participants with active ankylosing spondylitis. The study comprises of 4 phases: Screening phase (up to 6 weeks), Double-blind placebo-controlled phase (Week 0 to Week 16), Active treatment phase (Week 16 to Week 52), and Safety follow-up phase (8 weeks from last study drug administration). Total duration of the study will be 60 weeks per participant. Eligible Participants will be randomly assigned to either Treatment group 1: Placebo or Treatment group 2: Golimumab. Participants randomized to Placebo group, will receive intravenous infusions of placebo at Weeks 0, 4 and 12. At Week 16, all participants receiving placebo will begin receiving intravenous infusions of golimumab (2 mg/kg) at Weeks 16, 20 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 52. Participants randomized to Golimumab group, will receive intravenous infusions of golimumab 2 mg/kg at Weeks 0, 4 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 52. At Week 16, participants randomized to golimumab group will receive a placebo infusion to maintain the blind. The efficacy will be assessed primarily by measuring percentage of participants who achieve a 20 percent improvement from baseline in the assessment in ankylosing spondylitis (ASAS) at Week 16. Participant's safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
208

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Maroochydore, Australia
  • Canada
      • Burlington, Canada
      • Trois-Rivières, Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
  • Germany
      • Bad Doberan, Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Erfurt, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Planegg, Germany
      • Ratingen, Germany
      • Zerbst, Germany
  • Mexico
      • Chihuahua City, Mexico
  • Poland
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland
      • Bytom, Poland
      • Nadarzyn, Poland
      • Nowa Sól, Poland
      • Poznan, Poland
      • Warsaw, Poland
  • Russia
      • Moscow, Russia
      • Saint Petersburg, Russia
      • Saratov, Russia
      • Smolensk, Russia
      • Tver', Russia
  • South Korea
      • Ansan, South Korea
      • Daegu, South Korea
      • Gwangju, South Korea
      • Seongdong-Gu, South Korea
      • Seoul, South Korea
  • Ukraine
      • Chernihiv, Ukraine
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
      • Odesa, Ukraine
      • Vinnytsia, Ukraine
      • Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • La Palma, California, United States
    • Indiana
      • Granger, Indiana, United States
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New York
      • Orchard Park, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis for at least 3 months based on modified New York radiographic and clinical criteria
  • Participants with symptoms of active disease at screening and at baseline
  • Participant has either an inadequate response to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) over a 4 week period in total with maximal recommended doses of NSAIDs, or is unable to receive a full 4 weeks of maximal NSAID therapy because of intolerance, toxicity, or contraindications to NSAIDs
  • Participants with C- reactive protein (CRP) level of greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening
  • Additional protocol-defined inclusion criteria apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant with other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit from the golimumab therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Participants with chest radiograph within 3 months prior to the first administration of study agent that shows an abnormality suggestive of a malignancy or current active infection, including tuberculosis
  • Participants who had a serious infection (including but not limited to, hepatitis, pneumonia, sepsis, or pyelonephritis), or have been hospitalized for an infection, or have been treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics for an infection within 2 months prior to first administration of study agent
  • Additional protocol-defined exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment Group 1: Placebo then Golimumab
Participants will receive intravenous infusions of placebo at Weeks 0, 4 and 12. At Week 16, all participants receiving placebo will begin receiving intravenous infusions of golimumab 2 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) at Weeks 16, 20 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 52.
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive matching placebo.
Drug: Golimumab
Participants will receive 2mg/kg of intravenous infusions of golimumab .
Experimental: Treatment Group 2: Golimumab
Participants will receive intravenous infusions of golimumab 2 mg/kg at Weeks 0, 4 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 52. At Week 16, participants will receive a placebo infusion to maintain the blind.
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive matching placebo.
Drug: Golimumab
Participants will receive 2mg/kg of intravenous infusions of golimumab .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 20 Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS 20) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
ASAS 20 defined as 20 percent (%) improvement compared to baseline in the ASAS Working Group criteria: that is, greater than or equal to (>=)20% improvement from baseline in at least 3 of the 4 domains: patient's global assessment of disease activity (0=very well,10 =very poor), total back pain (0=no pain,10=most severe pain), function (self-assessment using BASFI [0=no functional impairment to 10= maximal impairment]), inflammation (0=none,10=very severe) with an absolute improvement of at least 1 (0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale [VAS]), and an absence of deterioration (defined as >=20% worsening and absolute worsening of at least 1 on a 0-10 cm scale) in the potential remaining domain.
Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 40 Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS 40) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
An ASAS 40 response is defined as >=40% improvement from baseline in 3 of 4 domains: patient's global assessment of disease activity (0=very well, 10=very poor), total back pain (0=no pain, 10=most severe pain), function (self-assessment using BASFI (0=no functional impairment to 10=maximal impairment), inflammation (0=none, 10=very severe) with an absolute improvement of at least 2 (0-10 cm VAS), and no deterioration in the remaining domain.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The BASDAI is a self-assessment tool to determine disease activity using a VAS of 0-10 cm (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring fatigue, spinal pain, joint pain, enthesitis, and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI is calculated as a mean of individual questions with a final score range of 0 to 10 cm; 0=best and 10=worst.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16
The BASFI is a participant's self-assessment of physical function represented as a mean of 10 questions, each question rated on VAS 0 to 10 cm (VAS 0 to 10 cm; 0=easy to 10=impossible), 8 of which relate to the participant's functional anatomy and 2 of which relate to a participant's ability to cope with everyday life.
Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Medical Outcome Study health measure SF-36 questionnaire is a well-validated and widely used quality-of-life instrument. It is a self-administered survey that consists of 8 multi-item scales: The 4 subscales of the SF-36 comprises the PCS score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and the 4 subscales of the SF-36 comprises the MCS score (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). PCS and MCS are scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health (worst value is 0 and best value is 100), which are scored using a norm-based system where linear transformations are performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Medical Outcome Study health measure SF-36 questionnaire is a well-validated and widely used quality-of-life instrument. It is a self-administered survey that consists of 8 multi-item scales: The 4 subscales of the SF-36 comprises the PCS score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and the 4 subscales of the SF-36 comprises the MCS score(vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). PCS and MCS are scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health (worst value is 0 and best value is 100), which are scored using a norm-based system where linear transformations are performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Low Level of Disease Activity (ASAS Partial Remission) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
Low level of disease activity was measured by criteria for ASAS partial remission, defined as a value below 2 on a scale of 0 to 10 cm in each of the 4 ASAS domains: patient's global assessment of disease activity, total back pain, function (BASFI), inflammation.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16
The ASQoL is a self-administered health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument. It consists of 18 items requesting a Yes or No response to questions related to the impact of the disease/condition (including pain) on sleep, mood, motivation, ability to cope, activities of daily living, independence, relationships, and social life. A score of 1 is given to a response of "yes" on each item and all item scores are summed to a total score with a range of 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL.
Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16
BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: tragus to wall distance, lumbar flexion, cervical rotation, lumbar side flexion, and intermalleolar distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility/mild disease involvement, 1=moderate disease involvement, 2=severe disease involvement) to give a final total BASMI score ranging from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score, the more severe was the participant's limitation of movement due to their AS.
Baseline and Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 3, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 11, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR103795
  • CNTO148AKS3001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2014-000241-74 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankylosing Spondylitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings