Effects of S-1 and Capecitabine on Coronary Artery Blood Flow (FluoHeart)

August 27, 2018 updated by: Heikki Joensuu

Effects of S-1 and Capecitabine in Combination With Oxaliplatin on the Coronary Artery Blood Flow in Patients Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tract Adenocarcinoma: a Randomized Phase II Study

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents , such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are occasionally associated with cardiac toxicity. Clinical fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity is infrequent, but subclinical toxicity may be much more common. Cardiac toxicity may be less frequent with S-1 as compared with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, but head-to-head comparisons are lacking. The purpose of the study is to compare 2 measures of subclinical coronary artery microvascular dysfunction, the coronary flow reserve and the coronary flow response to a cold pressor test, in a patient population who are being treated for adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract with one of 2 oxaliplatin-containing regimens, either with oxaliplatin plus S-1 or with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal tract are randomly assigned to receive two 3-weekly cycles of either XELOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d.1 followed by oral capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day divided in 2 daily doses d1-14) or SOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d. 1 followed by oral S-1 25 mg/m2/day BID d1-14). A cross-over between the 2 arms is carried out after the first 2 cycles; patients allocated to XELOX will receive 2 cycles of SOX (cycles 3 and 4), and those allocated to SOX will receive XELOX (cycles 3 and 4). Monitoring of the coronary artery flow, cardiac arrythmias, cardiac symptoms and blood biochemistry is done at baseline, during each chemotherapy cycle (cycles 1 to 4) and after treatment.Study treatment will continue until all patients have discontinued from treatment or maximum 24 weeks from the date of the first day of treatment, whichever occurs first. At that point, treatment may continue at the discretion of the Investigator. Each patient will be followed for survival status for a minimum of 12 months after first dose of study medication. Tumor assessments will be performed throughout the study period and analyzed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (Version 1.1, 2009). Computed tomography (CT) scans will be performed at the end of every 2 cycles. Cardiac assessments will be performed and analyzed using non-invasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, 24-h Holter registration, and plasma troponin concentration.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029
        • Helsinki University Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has given written informed consent.
  • Is at least 18 years of age.
  • Has advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma.
  • No previous cancer chemotherapy for cancer.
  • Measurable or evaluable lesions according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.
  • Is able to take medications orally.
  • Has ECOG performance status 0 or 1.
  • Has a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  • Has adequate organ function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer considered operable without prior chemotherapy.
  • Prior chemotherapy to cancer.
  • Previous therapy with fluoropyrimidines or anthracyclines for any indication.
  • Inability to swallow tablets.
  • Known brain metastasis or leptomeningeal metastasis.
  • History of myocardial infarction, coronary stenting/graft.
  • History of unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft.
  • History of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack.
  • History of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis.
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure.
  • Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias.
  • Patients with any cardiac disease that requires regular medication.
  • Hypertensive crisis or severe hypertension that is not controlled.
  • Is a pregnant or lactating female.
  • The cardiac arterial flow tests cannot be done.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX)
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d. 1 followed by oral S-1 25 mg/m2/day BID d1-14.
Drug: S-1
S-1 25 mg/m2/day BID d1-14, oxaliplatin injection 130 mg/m2 D1 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Teysuno
  • tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil
Drug: Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 D1 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Eloxatin
Active Comparator: Oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX)
Intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d.1 followed by oral capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day divided in 2 daily doses d1-14.
Drug: Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 D1 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Eloxatin
Drug: Capecitabine
capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day divided in 2 daily doses d1-14, oxaliplatin injection 130 mg/m2 D1 every 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • Xeloda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of coronary artery dysfunction
Time Frame: 3 months
The frequency of subclinical coronary artery dysfunction is as assessed by comparing the coronary flow reserve during chemotherapy with the baseline coronary flow reserve, and the coronary flow response to a cold pressor test.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coronary artery blood flow rate
Time Frame: 3 months
The coronary artery blood flow rate is measured with ultrasound. The rates are compared with the baseline and between the groups.
3 months
Cardiac arrythmias during 24-hour electrocardiogram registration
Time Frame: 3 months
Cardiac arrythmias detected with Holter cardiac recording.
3 months
Adverse events between the allocation groups
Time Frame: 3 months
by CTCAE.4
3 months
Response to chemotherapy
Time Frame: 3 months
by RECIST 1.1
3 months
Survival status
Time Frame: 12 months
Survival from the first dose of study medication to study completion
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Heikki Joensuu

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Heikki Joensuu, MD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HUS-01/2013
  • 2013-003976-11 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings