Phase I, Dose Escalation Study of Decitabine

October 12, 2018 updated by: University of Florida

Minimizing Leukemia Relapse: A Phase I, Dose Escalation Study of Decitabine in High Risk Pediatric Leukemia Post Allogeneic Transplant

Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent that has shown significant anti-leukemic effect in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML). This study is based on the hypothesis that Decitabine delivered after allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in patients with leukemia will enhance disease control by the allogeneic immune system and lead to a longer disease free survival. The study is designed to provide safety data of low-dosing in the post-transplant setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent with significant anti-leukemic effect in MDS and AML. Additionally, aberrant DNA methylation has been identified in high risk childhood ALL, and therefore, DNA hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine, have been identified as therapeutic agents. Moreover, decitabine has immunomodulatory effects by enhancement of class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigen expression on cancer cells, which increases their susceptibility to immune surveillance mechanisms, such as graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor cells in allogeneic transplantation and by augmentation of natural killer (NK), T and B lymphocyte reactivity. We hypothesize that decitabine delivered after allo-HSCT in patients with leukemia will enhance disease control by the allogeneic immune system and lead to a longer disease free survival. However, a safety study is needed to determine appropriate decitabine dosing in the post-transplant period. Low doses of decitabine are likely better tolerated in the post-transplant setting given risks of myelosuppression. In addition, when administered at lower doses, decitabine's hypomethylation effects are more pronounced in relation to its pyrimidine analog cytotoxic effects. In this study low doses of decitabine will be administered beginning 6 weeks to 100 days post-transplant. Measures of gene methylation and immune reconstitution will be conducted to define biologically active doses. Results from this trial will provide new clinical data regarding the effects of decitabine on gene methylation and immunoreactivity, will establish a maximally tolerated dose in the post-transplant setting, will define biologically active doses, and will serve as a basis for future efficacy trials.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • UF Health Shands Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 30 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: greater than 1 and less than 31 years of age;
  • Diagnosis: history of ALL, AML or MDS, currently in a complete remission (CR) following allo-HSCT (bone marrow leukemic blasts less than 5% by morphology), with high risk features including:
  • Status post allogeneic HSCT
  • GVHD prophylaxis:
  • Karnofsky or Lansky performance scores more than 50%. Karnofsky scores will be used for patients > 16 years of age and Lansky scores for patients ≤ 16 years of age;
  • Platelet count ≥ 50,000 (untransfused);
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1000; and;
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL (un-transfused);

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Progressive disease;
  • Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (these patients receive tyrosine kinase inhibitor posttransplant);
  • Known hypersensitivity to any components of decitabine;
  • Uncontrolled grade 3-4 graft versus host disease;
  • Uncontrolled infection;
  • Serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 ;
  • Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 3 times normal or serum total bilirubin greater than 2 mg/dL;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Decitabine
This is a 3+3 design of dose escalation
Drug: Decitabine
Dose escalation starting at 5 mg, and increasing by 2.5 mg to a Dose Level of 12.5 mg qd x 3 days.
Other Names:
  • Decitabine, Dacogen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Tolerated Dose as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: 3 months
This is a dose escalation study of decitabine maintenance therapy after allo-HSCT for the maximally tolerated dose in pediatric patients without adverse events.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Event Profile After Single Cycle Decitabine Post Transplant
Time Frame: 6 months
The adverse events will be graded using the NCI Scale after one cycle of decitabine maintenance therapy intravenously. Grade 1 and 2 are unexpected and expect but unlikely related or unrelated; Grade 3 unexpected with hospitalization within 10 calendar days or possibly, probable related and without hospitalization; Grade 3 expected with hospitalization within 10 days or without hospitalization; Grade 4 and 5 Unexpected and Expected 24-hours to 5 days unlikely, unrelated, possible, probable, definite.
6 months
Grade 3 Adverse Events after Decitabine
Time Frame: 6 months
To estimate the incidences of ≥ grade 3 adverse events, infections, need for transfusions, treatment related mortality (TRM), and incidence and severity of graft vs host disease (GVHD) after initiation of decitabine post-HSCT. The grading will be done with the NCI Scale Grade 3 unexpected with hospitalization within 10 calendar days or possibly, probable related and without hospitalization; Grade 3 expected with hospitalization within 10 days or without hospitalization.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hyundai Hope On Wheels

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Castillo, MD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB201400612
  • PEDS004 (Other Identifier: University of Florida Protocol ID)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings