EndoFLIP Use in Upper GI Tract Stenosis (EndoFLIP)

September 10, 2019 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

Expanding the Clinical Applications of Functional Luminal Imaging (EndoFLIP) in Esophageal Stenoses

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a functional luminal imaging probe to characterize benign esophageal luminal strictures before and after dilation and identify predictors of response to therapy. Patients will be evaluated during endoscopy using functional luminal imaging (EndoFLIP; Crospon Medical Devices, Galway, Ireland) to characterize the geometry of benign luminal esophageal narrowing before and after dilation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To date there is no effective way to objectively characterize and predict response to endoscopic dilation of luminal strictures of the GI tract. Endoscopic dilation allows effective remediation of benign esophageal and upper GI tract strictures. Stricture dilation is performed after the stricture diameter is crudely gauged by the endoscopist. Stricture characteristics are based on the severity of symptoms and appearance. A stricture may be graded as mild, moderate, severe and as to whether or not the endoscope is able to traverse the luminal narrowing. By precisely measuring the diameter and length of a stricture, the endoscopist can know exactly what type of dilation is necessary. Benign esophageal strictures may also be refractory to dilation and thus require multiple sessions, prior to achieving successful remediation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a functional luminal imaging probe to characterize benign esophageal luminal strictures before and after dilation and identify predictors of response to therapy. Patients will be evaluated during endoscopy using functional luminal imaging (EndoFLIP; Crospon Medical Devices, Galway, Ireland) to characterize the geometry of benign luminal esophageal narrowing before and after dilation. The study will include patients with strictures referred for endoscopic dilation for the following indications: radiation induced strictures, peptic strictures, RFA induced strictures, EMR induced strictures, eosinophilic esophagitis, Zenkers diverticulum, and strictures related to surgical anastomoses. In patients with benign refractory esophageal strictures referred for endoluminal prostheses EndoFLIP will be used to characterize the stricture prior to stent placement.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with benign refractory esophageal strictures referred for placement of an esophageal stent are eligible for this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > or = to 18 years of age
  • Referred for evaluation and treatment of benign esophageal luminal narrowing
  • Clinical diagnosis of benign esophageal luminal narrowing with documentation and imaging
  • Adult patients with benign refractory esophageal strictures referred for placement of an esophageal stent are eligible for this study
  • Willing and able to give informed consent
  • No condition or comorbidity which would prevent the patient from undergoing a successful upper endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years of age
  • Pregnancy
  • History of prior endoscopic dilation* (*unless referred for placement of stent)
  • Coagulopathy
  • Inability to traverse the stricture using standard techniques
  • Patients unable to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EndoFLIP Measurements
To define the role of a functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) in benign upper GI luminal narrowing. EndoFlip measurement of the cross sectional area of the narrowing will be obtained prior to and after endoscopic dilation. Patients will follow up for repeat endoscopy and dilation if indicated. EndoFLIP measurements will be made again before and after dilation. The use of EndoFlip may offer insight in to the clinical and endoscopic predictors of successful stricture dilation.
Device: EndoFLIP
The Endolumenal Functional Lumenal Imaging Probe Imaging System is a technology developed to measure the dimensions & function of a variety of hollow organs throughout the body. Since receiving FDA clearance for sale in the United States EndoFLIP has been used in a variety of clinical applications. We intend to investigate the potential clinical applications of EndoFLIP in the upper GI tract in patients with esophageal stenoses who require endoscopic therapy for benign esophageal strictures. The use of EndoFLIP to characterize a stricture pre- & post- dilation may offer insight in to the clinical and endoscopic predictors of successful stricture dilation, & what characteristics determine & predict refractory & recurrent strictures.
Other Names:
  • Endolumenal Functional Lumenal Imaging Probe

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Collection of Measurements of the Luminal Narrowing Using EndoFlip
Time Frame: 12 Months
The study is observational and a proof of concept study. Measurements of the luminal narrowing using EndoFLIP will be obtained.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observation of Pre-Endoscopic Therapy EndoFLIP Measurements
Time Frame: 12 Months
Patients will undergo the clinically indicated procedure for benign esophageal luminal narrowing remediation. Before undergoing clinically indicated esophageal therapy, measurements of the luminal narrowing using EndoFLIP will be obtained to identify potential predictors of response to endoscopic therapy. These measurements will included luminal diameter, length of narrowing and narrowing distensibility and will be obtained before and after delivery of the clinically indicated endoscopic therapy.
12 Months
Observation of Post-Endoscopic Therapy EndoFLIP Measurements
Time Frame: 12 Months
After undergoing clinically indicated esophageal therapy at clinically-indicated follow-up endoscopies, measurements of the luminal narrowing using EndoFLIP will again be obtained to identify responses to endoscopic therapy.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vinay Chandrasekhara, MD, University of Pennsylvania
  • Principal Investigator: Gregory G Ginsberg, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 10, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 819014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings