Shockwaves Therapy and Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy. A Cross Over RCT

March 9, 2017 updated by: Xavi Vidal Novellas

Efficacy of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Waves Compared to Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Spasticity of the Lower Extremities in Patients With Cerebral Palsy: a Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.

Spasticity is a motor disorder that can affect the lower limbs in up to 75% patients with cerebral palsy, having a significantly effect on their mobility and quality of life. There is much controversy about what is the most appropriate treatment of spasticity The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) compared to treatment with botulinum toxin to improve spasticity in patients with cerebral palsy

The number needed of patients is 70 (35 per group). Leaving a period of washout between one therapy and the other

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Outcome Measures:

The primary outcome will be to measure spasticity with passive range of motion of the foot (pROM) by muscular extensibility and its traction reflex using goniometryIt will be assessed at baseline before the treatment, as well as after 3 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, after the washout period (3months), 3 months and 3 weeks, 5 months and 6 months, when the end the intervention.

Secondary outcome includes: 1) Pain will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after the first application of each therapy. 2) Ascertain if the type of Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) has an influence on the improvement of these two treatments; 3) Assess whether infiltration of Botulinum Toxin in other muscle groups have influence on the results of study; and 4) Undergo a qualitative registration to know the perception and experience that patient/family will have during this study, through a satisfaction questionnaire.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08320
        • Centro Piloto Arcangel Sant Gabriel. ASPACE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 5 and 55 years
  • Any level of GMFCS (Gross Motor Function Classification System)
  • The patient consent to participate in the study
  • Diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy
  • Triceps Surae spasticity in them.
  • The dynamic foot deformity.
  • Extensibility between 0 ° and 20 ° in dorsal flexion passive way.
  • Do not be diagnosed important cutaneous alterations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Associate neuromuscular disease.
  • Surgical Intervention to augment the balance articulate and / or reduce the spasticity in the last six months.
  • Fixed foot deformity.
  • Etiology of factors:

or genetic bone disorders / disturbances soft parts. Position with anomalies or alterations in soft parts or bone alterations (mechanical).

  • Unable to follow the treatment.
  • Allergy to botulinum toxin.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: shock waves
A comparative study with patients with spasticity in gastrocnemius and soleus where a group start having shockwave treatment and receive three sessions at weekly intervals, gastrocnemius and soleus applied in 2000 impacts at a frequency of 8hz and energy intensity is proposed between 2.2-2.4 Bars (0,10-0,12mj ). Swiss dolor clast EMS. The other group will receive botulinum toxin Type A in the same muscles. The dose of toxin is in accordance with the weight of each patient, the dose normally used with each user and always with the same brand is always respected, Botox (4-8-12 U/Kg) Patients will be assessed before treatment, after three weeks, two months and three months after three months when the groups exchange the therapy.
Device: shock waves
Swiss dolorclast smart EMS Registration: EN-60601-1 Type BF IP40. 93/42 CEE
Active Comparator: botulinum toxin
A comparative study with patients with spasticity in gastrocnemius and soleus where a group start having shockwave treatment and receive three sessions at weekly intervals, gastrocnemius and soleus applied in 2000 impacts at a frequency of 8hz and energy intensity is proposed between 2.2-2.4 Bars (0,10-0,12mj ). Swiss dolor clast EMS.The other group will receive botulinum toxin type A in the same muscles. The dose of toxin is in accordance with the weight of each patient, the dose normally used with each user and always with the same brand is always respected. Botox (4-8-12 U/Kg)Patients will be assessed before treatment, after three weeks, two months and three months after three months when the groups exchange the therapy.
Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A
Botulinum toxin type A Botox
Other Names:
  • Type A

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
muscle elongation of spastic muscle will be evaluated using composite measure of muscular extensibility and their traction reflex with goniometry
Time Frame: up to three months
up to three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the patients perceive pain
Time Frame: after each therapy
It shall be assessed by visual analog scale
after each therapy
Ascertain if the type of GMFCS has an influence on the improvement of these two treatments. Qualitative registation to achieve the percepcion and experience that have made the treatment received the patient/family.
Time Frame: at the end to study
at the end to study
To undergo a qualitative registration to know the perception and experience that patient/family will have during this study
Time Frame: at the end to study
at the end to study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xavi Vidal Novellas

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cerebral Palsy Association

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vidal Novellas, Aspace. Association of Cerebral Palsy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Neuroshockwaves

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on shock waves

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings