Weight-Bearing Tomosynthesis In Evaluation of Foot/AnkIe

October 24, 2017 updated by: Alice Ha, University of Washington
This study aims to compare digital tomosynthesis with radiography and weight-bearing CT as an imaging technique to assess arthritis in the foot and ankle.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overall goal of this study is to improve radiologic evaluation of foot and ankle arthritis. Today's standard of care, radiography, provides limited two-dimensional evaluation of joint alignment, arthritic changes, posttraumatic changes, and congenital deformities due to overlapping bone densities. Evaluation is even more limited in post-surgical patients due to overlapping metallic hardware. Computed tomography (CT), the current problem-solving tool, offers more "level-by-level" three dimensional information, but is fraught with additional cost, additional radiation dose, beam-hardening artifacts from hardware, and the need for additional equipment. Most importantly, patients are not weight-bearing during conventional CT, therefore masking the true extent of malalignment or arthritic joint space narrowing. At the University of Washington, physicians attempt to overcome the last problem by performing simulated weight-bearing CT. The study proposes an alternate solution to this problem using a novel application of an old method, digital tomosynthesis. Specific aims of the study are 1) to compare radiography, tomosynthesis, and simulated-weight bearing CT in their ability to detect foot/ankle malalignment, 2) to compare the abilities of these three modalities to detect arthritis changes such as joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and subchondral cysts, and 3) to compare their abilities to detect bony deformities such as acute fracture, old fracture deformity, or partial fusion (post traumatic or post surgical). Radiographic assessment will be correlated with clinical outcome using clinical notes and functional outcome such as the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire. Successful results from this initial study will have the potential to change practice paradigm in how to image foot and ankle arthritis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. adult age (18 years or older)
  2. clinical orthopedic surgery follow-up notes available at University of Washington
  3. ability to complete the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) or equivalent questionnaire at the time of the study, a well established survey to test for functional ability in lower extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. inability to use the simulated weight bearing CT machine due to pain
  2. prior complete osseous fusion of foot/ankle joints
  3. prior total ankle arthroplasty
  4. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Foot/Ankles imaged with tomosynthesis

Intervention: Digital Tomosynthesis of Foot and Ankle

The intervention, digital tomosynthesis of the foot and ankle, will be done on eligible participants. The resulting images will be compared to radiography and weight-bearing CT images from the same participants.

Imaging Technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Arthritis (assessed through reading radiologic images and through a pain survey)
Time Frame: One day
Severity of arthritis will be assessed through reading radiologic images and through a pain survey filled out by participants.
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 48992

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Digital Tomosynthesis of Foot and Ankle

Search Similar Trials