The Use of a Dynamic Sustained Compression Intramedullary Nail for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis

May 24, 2021 updated by: MedShape, Inc
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy of a novel sustained dynamic compression intramedullary nail for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis utilizing longitudinal weight-bearing computed tomographic imaging. Of particular focus will be assessment of compressive element recovery and its relation to fusion development over time and weight-bearing status. Additionally, the study will incorporate longitudinal fusion assessment to evaluate differences between three-dimensional weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans and two-dimensional radiographs (X-rays) at multiple points of the fusion process. Finally, the study will evaluate the differences in WBCT-based fusion assessment between automated and manual methodologies for fusion area calculation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a collaborative effort between the Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, MedShape, Inc, and CurveBeam. This is a prospective investigation to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with the Sustained Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail (DynaNail), including longitudinal assessment with weight-bearing CT. The investigators plan to enroll 45 patients. No placebo control will be used, as there is no other IM nail available capable of providing sustained compression. Additionally, given that many patients receiving this treatment have had prior failed treatments and face poor alternatives such as amputation, using a prior-generation IM nail as a control treatment would be unethical.

Design:

This is a prospective, single-group study. Patients of the Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center who are scheduled to undergo TTC arthrodesis will be screened for eligibility and informed consent will be obtained from those who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects will be assessed pre-operatively and then at five post-operative intervals: 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. A WBCT scan will be obtained at each interval.

Selection of Subjects:

Patients will be identified in the clinic by an attending orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon or his/her physician assistant based on clinical exam and radiographic findings. Patients will be screened for eligibility by the research coordinator/ key personnel in close coordination with the surgeon and co-investigator.

Pre-operative Questionnaire:

After informed consent, the patients will be asked to complete patient reported outcomes questionnaires that are part of the SOS Registry associated with function and pain, including VAS, VR-12, FFI-R, FAAM, AOS, and AOFAS. The patients will also be asked to provide information related to prior medical history (including potential co-morbidities associated with non-union, i.e. tobacco usage, neuropathy, renal disease, obesity, etc.) and surgical history of the subject lower extremity.

Surgery:

The following surgical procedure is standard of care. The surgical procedure will involve both tibiotalar and talocalcaneal joint preparation through any approach (lateral, posterior, anterior with sinus tarsi). The use of supplemental bone graft is at the discretion of the treating surgeon but must be documented. The MedShape DynaNail will then be inserted according to the manufacturer's technique. The patient will be placed in a short leg splint and kept non-weight bearing initially. The patient will be discharged from the hospital when medically ready. Weight-bearing will start at seven weeks post-surgery.

Follow-Up Visits and Questionnaires:

The patient will return to clinic for visits at the following intervals after surgery: 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. At each of these time points, a clinical exam will be conducted, and SOS patient questionnaires will be administered, as well as a radiographic and clinical follow-up form. Additionally, radiograph and weight-bearing CT imaging will be obtained of both the ankle and subtalar joints. At 3 months and 12 months post-op, all X-ray and CT images will be de-identified, burned to a DVD, and copies will be sent to both co-sponsors.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Worthington, Ohio, United States, 43085
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patrick Bull, DO
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gregory C Berlet, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Terrence M Philbin, DO
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mark A Prissel, DPM
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christopher F Hyer, DPM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients of the Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center with end-stage tibiotalar (ankle) and talocalcaneal (subtalar) joint arthritis from any etiology will be eligible to enroll in the study. In general, tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis is caused by trauma. Traumatic injuries have no predilection for race, religion, cultural background, etc. Therefore, all demographic groups will have access to this study and should be represented.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets indications for TTC arthrodesis and receives the DynaNail implant
  • Able to understand the requirements of the study
  • Willing to comply with the study protocol
  • Sign an Informed consent
  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Investigator determines that the subject is unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study
  • Non-English speaker
  • Blind
  • Illiterate
  • Prisoner

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fusion
Time Frame: Pre-Operative to 1 year post-surgery
Joint Fusion, as measured by radiographs and CT scans. Fusion rates will be assessed based on varying CT fusion areas. Fusion rates based on X-Ray vs CT assessment will also be compared. CT fusion rates based on varying fusion areas will be compared with PROM data to assess which fusion area actually corresponds to increased function and reduced pain.
Pre-Operative to 1 year post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS
Time Frame: Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
Visual Analog Scaled (VAS) - Rates the intensity of pain from 0 - 10 with 10 being the worst pain possible and 0 being no pain.
Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
VR-12
Time Frame: Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12, formerly called the Veterans SF-12) was developed from the Veterans RAND 36 (VR-36, formerly called the Veterans SF-36), which was modified from the original MOS SF-36. The VR-12 measures Physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitation due to physical problems (RP), role limitation due to emotional problems (RE), mental health (MH), energy and vitality (VT), bodily pain (BP) and general perception of health (GH). Standard based scoring (sometimes called norm based scoring) is used to calculate the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) for both measures. The PCS and MCS are standardized using a t-score transformation and normed to a US population at a score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate better health.
Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
FFI-R
Time Frame: Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
Foot Function Index-Revised - Measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability, and activity restriction. The score is a percentage. The higher the score, the greater the disability.
Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
FAAM
Time Frame: Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Measures patient capacity for sports and activities of daily living (ADL). The final score is a percentage. The higher final score represents a higher level of physical function.
Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
AOS
Time Frame: Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale - Measures pain levels and difficulty performing various activities of daily living. A line-based scale with range from no pain to the worst pain imaginable.
Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
AOFAS
Time Frame: Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Scale - Clinician-based outcome that measures foot/ankle pain, function, and alignment. The lower the score, the greater the disability. The maximum score is 100.
Pre-Operative up to one year post-surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Automated vs Manual Fusion Assessment
Time Frame: Up to one year post-surgery
Fusion area calculation over time will be assessed not only by two clinically-trained reviewers, but also using CurveBeam's automated CubeVue assessment software. Averaged clinician results will be compared with CubeVue-calculated data.
Up to one year post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory C Berlet, MD, Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 24, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Arthritis

Clinical Trials on DynaNail

3
Subscribe