Study of Methodologies to Measure Blood Flow and Oxygenation in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease

December 16, 2020 updated by: Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc.

A Study of Methodologies to Measure Blood Flow and Oxygenation as Potential Biomarkers in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease

The purpose of the study is to determine whether imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), and optical imaging (OI), can detect differences in blood flow and oxygen levels in different organ systems of participants with sickle cell disease (SCD). Differences in blood flow and oxygen levels detected by these techniques will be evaluated to determine their utility as biomarkers of clinical disease pathophysiology.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with mild to severe VOC

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a diagnosis of SCD confirmed by hemoglobin analysis.

  2. Be in stable clinical condition, as determined by the Investigator.

    Subjects enrolled in Part B must also meet the following eligibility criterion at Screening:

  3. Receiving scheduled standard of care RBC exchange transfusion therapy, with ≥3 transfusions already received.
  4. Be deemed healthy, as determined by the Investigator, based on the physical examination, medical history, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and clinical laboratory measurements.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to lie still for ≥5 minutes, claustrophobia sufficient to interfere with generating reliable MRI scans, body weight exceeding 320.0 lbs., or girth exceeding the magnet bore.
  2. Presence of a metal device affected by MRI (e.g., any type of electronic, mechanical or magnetic implant, cardiac pacemaker, aneurysm clips, implanted cardiac defibrillator) or potential ferromagnetic foreign body (metal slivers, metal shavings, other metal objects) which would be a contraindication for MRI.
  3. Acute pain crisis requiring hospitalization, with a discharge ≤4 weeks prior to the first imaging visit, or when determined by the Investigator to not be at steady state.
  4. Recent (≤3 months) treatment with hydroxyurea therapy.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Part A
Cohort 1- Participants with severe SCD (4-10 VOC/year) Cohort 2- Participants with milder SCD (<4-10 VOC/year) Cohort 3- Healthy volunteers Part A and B can occur in parallel
Part B
Adults with SCD receiving chronic red blood cell exchange transfusion Part A and B can occur in parallel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Blood flow in the brain of adults with severe SCD (4-10 vaso-occlusive crises [VOC]/ year) compared to healthy adults without SCD as assessed by MRI-ASL (arterial spin labeling)
Time Frame: Up to day 18 post screening visit
Up to day 18 post screening visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Kidney blood flow rates as assessed by MRI-SWI (susceptibility-weighted imaging)
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Skeletal muscle blood flow rates as assessed by NIRS
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Skin blood flow rates as assessed by LSCI
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Retinal blood flow rates as assessed by OI
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Total oxygen levels in the brain as assessed by MRI-ASL
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Total oxygen levels in the kidney as assessed by MRI-SWI
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Total oxygen levels in the muscle as assessed by NIRS
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Total oxygen levels in the skin as assessed by LSCI
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit
Total oxygen levels in the retina as assessed by OI
Time Frame: Up to day 21 post screening visit
Up to day 21 post screening visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Medical Director, Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 996SC001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings