Development of Core Outcomes for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Interventions- Caregivers' Perspective

January 9, 2020 updated by: Professor Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Queen's University, Belfast

Development of Core Outcomes for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

This study will explore experience of AMD caregivers in order to develop a core outcome set (COS) for age related macular degeneration (AMD) randomised controlled trials (RCTs) trying to capture what research outcomes are important from their perspective.

People 18 years of age and older who have been AMD caregivers for at least 6 months may be eligible for this study.

The aim is to conduct three focus groups lasting approximately one hour. The plan is to enrol 18-24 participants (6-8 participants per each of 3 focus groups).Two researchers will be involved in conducting the focus groups. A moderator will ensure fluid discussion, while the second investigator will be taking notes and audio-recording the discussion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely employed interventional studies in medicine, yet many times their outcomes are presented inconsistently. The COMET Initiative (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) suggests that a solution for that issue would be preparation of a core outcome set (COS)a minimal group of outcome measures relevant to different group of stakeholders (e.g. clinicians, patients, carers) that would be implemented in each RCT in a particular area. The overall aim is to prepare a COS for age related-macular degeneration (AMD) RCTs. As first step to develop a COS for AMD, the investigators conducted a systematic review that confirmed variability in AMD trials' outcome selection. The current step encompasses involvement of different stakeholders' groups in focus groups: patients and caregivers (current project) such as family members and friends helping AMD patients with their everyday living. Knowledge of caregivers' perspective on living with, treatment and outcomes for AMD is a key consideration when building up a COS, because they may not only evaluate existing outcomes, but also their experience may be translate into new outcomes. In the current focus group study, caregivers will be invited for a one hour discussion. The investigators plan to arrange three focus groups with approximately 8 participants each. Two researchers will be present to help facilitate discussion. Participants will be asked about their experience related to their help brought to AMD patients, observations of living with and treatment of AMD as well as about AMD study outcomes and their importance.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Co.Antrim
      • Belfast, Co.Antrim, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA
        • Centre for Experimental Medicine Queen's University Belfast

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

caregivers/ carers such as family members, unpaid friends or volunteers taking active part in providing help and support for AMD patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking participants
  • AMD patients' caregivers defined as people actively taking part in providing support for AMD patients
  • Being a caregiver for at least 6 months
  • Having daily contact with AMD patients (not necessarily living with patients)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking participants
  • Being a caregiver for less than 6 months
  • Not having daily contact with AMD patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Focus groups
AMD patients' caregivers defined as people actively taking part in providing support for AMD patients (e.g. family members, unpaid friends, volunteers)
Behavioral: Focus Groups
at least three focus groups lasting approximately one hour
Other Names:
  • Focus Group Discussion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of potential COS (core outcome set) elements for AMD randomised controlled trials as assessed by the focus group discussions.
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes
The expected list of COS (core outcome set) elements will plausibly include some of the visual function or anatomical measures as well as aspects of the quality of life. This study is a qualitative research study. No interventions will be given to the participants. No questionnaire or scale will be administered. The focus group discussions will aim to explore opinions of caregivers on outcomes used in AMD trials. Repeating themes of the discussions will be captured to form a potential COS for AMD trials.
up to 60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Queen's University, Belfast

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B15/31

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age Related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Focus Groups

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings