NBI Versus Indigo Carmine During Colonoscopy in Lynch Syndrome (LYNCH-CHROMO)

September 20, 2019 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Comparison of Colonoscopy With Virtual Chromoendoscopy Using 3rd Generation NBI System to Chromoendoscopy With Indigo Carmine in Lynch Patients.

This study compares two colonoscopy techniques (with Narrow Band Imaging versus with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) in patients having Lynch Syndrome

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye is recommended every 1 to 2 years in patients having Lynch Syndrome (LS). However, it is a time-consuming procedure, requiring a prior learning and has an additional cost, the reason why it is not yet systematically practiced in all endoscopy centers. The "Narrow Band Imaging" (NBI) is a recent virtual chromoendoscopy technique using optical filters at the light source of the endoscope to highlight the vascular structures of the mucosa by pressing a button. NBI is currently used to better characterize dysplasia lesions in the esophageal, gastric, and colon mucosa. A new generation (3rd generation) of NBI is currently available on some endoscopes, it can deliver more brightness and contrast, and could allow for better detection of flat lesions. Until today, no study has directly compared colonic chromoendoscopy with Indigo carmine to virtual chromoendoscopy with NBI (3rd generation) in LS patients. The hypothesis that this research aims to verify is that the new generation NBI system might do at least as well as indigo carmine in colonic adenoma detection in LS. This study aims to compare colonoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy using 3rd generation NBI system to chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine in LS patients, in a back-to-back, prospective non inferiority design, in which all patients will have both techniques in the following order: NBI first followed by Indigo carmine.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
141

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • AP-HP - hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou
    • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
      • Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, 69003
        • HCL - Hôpital Edouard-Herriot
    • Centre-Val De Loire
      • Chambray-lès-Tours, Centre-Val De Loire, France, 37170
        • CHRU de Tours - Hopital Trousseau
    • Pays De La Loire
      • Nantes, Pays De La Loire, France, 44093
        • CHU Nantes - Hôtel-Dieu
    • Île-de-France
      • Paris, Île-de-France, France, 75014
        • AP-HP - Hopital Cochin
      • Paris, Île-de-France, France, 75012
        • AP-HP - hôpital Saint-Antoine
      • Villejuif, Île-de-France, France, 94805
        • Institut Gustave-Roussy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lynch Syndrome with an identified mutation in one of the genes MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1), MutL Homolog 2 (MLH2), MutS homolog6 (MSH6), PMS2 or epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM)
  • Age between 18 and 80
  • Indication of a screening colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any sign of intestinal occlusion contra-indicating bowel preparation
  • History of total or subtotal colectomy
  • Any serious medical condition contra-indicating colonoscopy under general anesthesia
  • Pregnant or breast feeding women
  • Any coagulation disorder contra-indicating biopsies or endoscopic resections
  • Any history of hypersensitivity to indigo carmine
  • Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship or curatorship)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Indigo carmine colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using indigo carmine is performed in second place
Procedure: Colonoscopy
A double colonoscopy is performed in a back-to-back design using NBI chromoendoscopy then indigo carmine in each patient.
Experimental: NBI colonoscopy
Colonoscopy using NBI is performed in first place
Procedure: Colonoscopy
A double colonoscopy is performed in a back-to-back design using NBI chromoendoscopy then indigo carmine in each patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of adenomas and / or adenocarcinoma detected during each procedure (NBI vs Indigo carmine)
Time Frame: procedure time
The adenoma detection rate (number of adenoma and/or adenocarcinoma) of NBI and the additional adenoma detection rate of indigo carmine.
procedure time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All neoplastic lesions detected during colonoscopy
Time Frame: procedure time
Collect the number, size, location, endoscopic (Paris Classification) and anatomo-pathologic aspect (adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, adenocarcinoma) of all detected lesions with their respective prevalence.
procedure time
Cost of each procedure (NBI vs Indigo carmine)
Time Frame: Procedure time
Evaluate the cost of each procedure including therapy.
Procedure time
Duration of each procedure (NBI vs Indigo carmine)
Time Frame: Procedure time
Evaluate the duration of each procedure (with and without endoscopic therapy).
Procedure time
Number of subject with adverse events as mesure of safety.
Time Frame: One month after colonoscopy
Followed a month post colonoscopy to evaluate the occurrence of undesirable events
One month after colonoscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
ARC Foundation for Cancer Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: CHRISTOPHE CELLIER, MD, PHD, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 20, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P140108
  • 2015-A00552-47 (Other Grant/Funding Number: ANSM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lynch Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings