Study Aiming to Test Whether Non-invasive Liquid Biopsies Can Safely Reduce Invasive Surveillance Methods in Lynch Syndrome (PREDI-LYNCH)

January 22, 2026 updated by: UNICANCER

Predicting Cancer Onset in Lynch Syndrome by Liquid Biopsies

Lynch syndrome is an inherited genetic predisposition that increases the risk of developing several types of cancer, particularly colon and rectal cancers (colorectal cancer), as well as cancer of the uterine lining (endometrial cancer). It affects around 1 in 400 people in Europe.

Today, surveillance mainly relies on examinations such as colonoscopy (an examination of the colon using a camera) or gynaecological evaluations, sometimes accompanied by biopsies (the removal of a small tissue sample for microscopic analysis). Although effective, these procedures are invasive and demanding; they can affect quality of life and discourage some individuals from adhering to their recommended surveillance programme.

The European project PREDI-LYNCH is exploring an additional pathway that is simpler and better tolerated. This project relies on "liquid biopsies", meaning tests performed on easily collected samples such as blood, urine, stool, and vaginal swabs for women with a uterus. The PREDI-LYNCH study aims to determine whether these non-invasive tests could enable personalised surveillance and potentially increase the interval between more burdensome procedures, while maintaining a high level of medical safety.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This European clinical study evaluates whether non-invasive liquid biopsy tests (blood, urine, stool and vaginal samples when applicable) can improve cancer surveillance in adults with genetically confirmed Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or EPCAM). The trial compares two strategies: standard follow-up with colonoscopy every 18 months versus an approach combining annual liquid biopsies with a colonoscopy every 36 months. The main outcome is the number of new cancer cases diagnosed, confirmed by standard procedures. Secondary outcomes include early cancer detection, lesion identification, diagnostic timing, feasibility, quality of life and healthcare use. Each positive test leads to fast confirmatory exams. The aim is to determine if liquid biopsies can safely reduce invasive procedures while maintaining effective cancer monitoring.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant must have signed a written informed consent prior to any trial specific procedures. When the patient is physically unable to give their written consent, a trusted person of their choice, independent from the investigator or the sponsor, can confirm in writing the patient's consent.
  2. Age 35-80
  3. Genetically confirmed class 4-5 (likely pathogenic (LP) or pathogenic (P) variant, respectively) in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or EPCAM gene.
  4. The participant should be insurance covered for the financial costs of the standard surveillance and healthcare related to LS, such as affiliated to Social Security System

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previously performed proctocolectomy or equivalent (entire colon and rectum removed)
  2. Active treatment for cancer within 2 years prior to inclusion.
  3. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy within 12 months
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Participants unwilling or unable to comply with the medical follow-up required by the trial because of geographic, familial, social, or psychological reasons.
  6. Persons deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental arm
Biopsies Liquids +/- Colonoscopy
The trial compares two strategies: standard follow-up with colonoscopy every 18 months versus an approach combining annual liquid biopsies with a colonoscopy every 36 months
Other: Control arm
Colonoscopy each 18 months
The trial compares two strategies: standard follow-up with colonoscopy every 18 months versus an approach combining annual liquid biopsies with a colonoscopy every 36 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine whether a multimodal surveillance strategy - using combining concurrent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), urine tumor DNA (utDNA), vaginal swab tumor DNA (vsDNA), and stool (qFIT) - is non-inferior to standard-of-care screening surveillance
Time Frame: Baseline, month 12, month 24, month 36, month 48
Number of newly diagnosed histologically confirmed invasive cancers (CRC, EC, UC) during surveillance and follow-up phases, expressed as cumulative incidence (%) and incidence per 1,000 person-years.
Baseline, month 12, month 24, month 36, month 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chrystelle Colas, Oncogeneticist, Institut Curie
  • Study Director: Toni Seppala, Surgeon, TAMPERE University (Finland)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lynch Syndrome

Clinical Trials on INVITRO DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND COLONOSCOPY

Subscribe