Efficacy of a Modified Technique of Free Gingival Graft in Volumetric Changes of the Graft: Randomized Clinical Trial (EFFECT)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05508-000
- Faculdade de Odontologia da USP
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Reduced keratinized tissue (less than 2 mm) in inferior incisors area
- Healthy periodontium in inferior incisors area
- Indication for surgery (e.g. pain during tooth brushing, gingival margin mobility, gingival recession...)
- Recessions class I, II or III, maximum 3 mm
- Having signed the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic diseases
- Smokers
- Pregnant and lactating women
- Root caries lesions
- Previous surgeries at same area
- Accentuated root abrasion
- Malpositioning teeth
- Residual pocket depths greater than 4 mm
- Tooth mobility greater than 1
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Modified Free Gingival Graft
Twenty patients will receive the modified free gingival graft technique at the inferior incisors area.
In this technique, the graft is covered by a flap, similarly to what is done in a connective tissue graft surgery.
|
Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft technique, harvested from palate.
Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft.
positioned at the inferior incisors area and covered by a flap at the donor area
|
|
Active Comparator: Original Free Gingival Graft technique
Twenty patients will receive the original technique of free gingival graft at the inferior incisors area.
|
Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft technique, harvested from palate.
Surgical technique (autologous graft): Original technique of free gingival graft, positioned at the inferior incisors area at the donor area
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Apical-cervical width of keratinized tissue after 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance between gingival margin and mucogingival junction, in millimeters
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probing Depth
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance between gingival margin and bottom of the sulcus / pocket, in millimeters
|
12 months
|
|
Keratinized tissue area
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Keratinized tissue area, measured in millimeters
|
12 months
|
|
Keratinized tissue thickness
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Keratinized tissue thickness measured in millimeters
|
12 months
|
|
Volume of receiving area
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Volume of receiving area
|
12 months
|
|
Complete epithelization of donor area
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Area of Epithelization of wound healing, measured in mm2
|
28 days
|
|
Postoperative discomfort
Time Frame: 28 days
|
discomfort measured using Visual Analogue Scale
|
28 days
|
|
Gum color
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measured with photographic analysis
|
12 months
|
|
Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHIP)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
OHIp - 14 short version
|
12 months
|
|
Clinical Attachment Level
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance between cementum-enamel junction and bottom of sulcus / pocket, measured in millimeters
|
12 months
|
|
Recession
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Distance between cementum-enamel junction and gingival margin, measured in millimeters
|
12 months
|
|
Bleeding on probing
Time Frame: 12 months
|
percentage of sites which bled upon probing
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claudio M Pannuti, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
- Study Director: João Batista C Neto, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cesar Neto JB, Cavalcanti MC, Silva CO, Almeida VC, Sapata VM, Lazarin RO, Jung R, Romito GA, Tatakis DN, Pannuti CM. Digital three-dimensional assessment of free gingival graft remodeling over 12 months. J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105216. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105216. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
- Almeida VC, Pannuti CM, Ferreira MS, Lazarin RO, Romito GA, Jung RE, Tatakis DN, Silva COE, Cesar Neto JB. Conventional versus flap-protected free gingival graft: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2023 Jan 6;37:e001. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0001. eCollection 2023.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EFFECT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.